紫外线防护眼罩和面罩,防止生物危害。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1111/opo.13342
Stephen J Dain, Brian B Cheng, Maitreyee Roy
{"title":"紫外线防护眼罩和面罩,防止生物危害。","authors":"Stephen J Dain, Brian B Cheng, Maitreyee Roy","doi":"10.1111/opo.13342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the development of eye and face protection standards against biological hazards, it is important to consider that the eye and face protectors may be used in the outdoor environment, where ultraviolet (UV) exposure from the sun is much higher than indoors. Workers affected include paramedics, ambulance officers and clinical testing personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spectral transmittances (280-780 nm) were measured on eight face shields and one goggle of the types used in hospital and clinical environments, three overhead projector sheets and an occupational impact protective goggle. The UV and luminous transmittances were calculated according to the international and two national sunglass standards, and compared with the compliance requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the face shields and goggle lenses were made of variants of the same material. All the samples, including the overhead projector sheets, complied with the requirements of the sunglass standards (for normal conditions, in the case of the American standard).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since all the lenses complied with the sunglass standards for UV protection, and there appears to be uniformity in the choice of materials in this product type, there is no need to make provision, as is the case for occupational eye and face protection standards, for protectors that do not provide UV protection. This makes labelling and advice to end users from eyecare and safety professionals much simpler.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultraviolet protection in eye and face protection against biological hazards.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J Dain, Brian B Cheng, Maitreyee Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the development of eye and face protection standards against biological hazards, it is important to consider that the eye and face protectors may be used in the outdoor environment, where ultraviolet (UV) exposure from the sun is much higher than indoors. Workers affected include paramedics, ambulance officers and clinical testing personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spectral transmittances (280-780 nm) were measured on eight face shields and one goggle of the types used in hospital and clinical environments, three overhead projector sheets and an occupational impact protective goggle. The UV and luminous transmittances were calculated according to the international and two national sunglass standards, and compared with the compliance requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the face shields and goggle lenses were made of variants of the same material. All the samples, including the overhead projector sheets, complied with the requirements of the sunglass standards (for normal conditions, in the case of the American standard).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since all the lenses complied with the sunglass standards for UV protection, and there appears to be uniformity in the choice of materials in this product type, there is no need to make provision, as is the case for occupational eye and face protection standards, for protectors that do not provide UV protection. This makes labelling and advice to end users from eyecare and safety professionals much simpler.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1142-1147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在制定针对生物危害的护眼和面罩标准时,必须考虑到护眼和面罩可能会在户外环境中使用,而在户外环境中,阳光中的紫外线(UV)照射要比室内高得多。受影响的工作人员包括护理人员、救护人员和临床测试人员:方法:测量了医院和临床环境中使用的 8 种面罩和 1 种护目镜、3 种高射投影仪片和 1 种职业冲击防护镜的光谱透射率(280-780 纳米)。根据国际太阳镜标准和两个国家太阳镜标准计算了紫外线透射率和光透射率,并与合规要求进行了比较:结果:所有面罩和护目镜镜片均由同一种材料制成。所有样品,包括投影仪镜片,都符合太阳镜标准的要求(就美国标准而言,在正常条件下):结论:由于所有镜片都符合太阳镜防紫外线标准,而且这类产品在材料选择上似乎是 统一的,因此没有必要像职业眼睛和面部防护标准那样,对不提供防紫外线保护的保护 器作出规定。这就使得标签的制作以及眼部护理和安全专业人员对最终用户的建议变得更加简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultraviolet protection in eye and face protection against biological hazards.

Background: In the development of eye and face protection standards against biological hazards, it is important to consider that the eye and face protectors may be used in the outdoor environment, where ultraviolet (UV) exposure from the sun is much higher than indoors. Workers affected include paramedics, ambulance officers and clinical testing personnel.

Methods: Spectral transmittances (280-780 nm) were measured on eight face shields and one goggle of the types used in hospital and clinical environments, three overhead projector sheets and an occupational impact protective goggle. The UV and luminous transmittances were calculated according to the international and two national sunglass standards, and compared with the compliance requirements.

Results: All the face shields and goggle lenses were made of variants of the same material. All the samples, including the overhead projector sheets, complied with the requirements of the sunglass standards (for normal conditions, in the case of the American standard).

Conclusion: Since all the lenses complied with the sunglass standards for UV protection, and there appears to be uniformity in the choice of materials in this product type, there is no need to make provision, as is the case for occupational eye and face protection standards, for protectors that do not provide UV protection. This makes labelling and advice to end users from eyecare and safety professionals much simpler.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信