有和无自身抗体的非妊娠妇女的维生素 D 水平。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tooba Farazmand, Raheleh Rahbarian, Mitra Jalali, Amirali Ghahremani, Abdollah Razi, Hasan Namdar Ahmadabad
{"title":"有和无自身抗体的非妊娠妇女的维生素 D 水平。","authors":"Tooba Farazmand, Raheleh Rahbarian, Mitra Jalali, Amirali Ghahremani, Abdollah Razi, Hasan Namdar Ahmadabad","doi":"10.22088/cjim.15.2.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the levels of vitamin D in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who were seropositive or seronegative for autoantibodies (autoAbs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined 58 RPL patients with autoAbs (ANA, anti-TPO, or APAs), 34 RPL patients without autoAbs, and 58 healthy women with prior successful pregnancies and without autoantibodies. The levels of 25 (OH) D were measured using the sandwich ELISA technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed insufficient serum 25(OH) D levels in study groups, with significantly lower levels observed in RPL patients with or without autoAbs compared to healthy women (P=0.0006). In addition, RPL patients with autoAbs had significantly lower 25(OH) D levels compared to RPL patients without autoAbs. We also found that serum levels of 25(OH) D in RPL patients with autoAbs were significantly lower than in RPL patients without autoAbs (20.51 ± 1.15 ng/ml Vs. 23.69 ± 0.74 ng/ml, <i>P</i>=0.0356). Further analysis indicated that RPL patients who were positive for ANA, and APAs, except anti-TPO, had significantly lower than 25(OH)D serum levels than RPL patients without autoAbs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that RPL patients, especially those with APAs or ANA, have lower vitamin D levels compared to healthy women. This may indicate a link between maternal immune dysregulation due to vitamin D deficiency and the presence of autoantibodies in RPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9646,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"266-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin D levels in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss with and without autoantibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Tooba Farazmand, Raheleh Rahbarian, Mitra Jalali, Amirali Ghahremani, Abdollah Razi, Hasan Namdar Ahmadabad\",\"doi\":\"10.22088/cjim.15.2.266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the levels of vitamin D in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who were seropositive or seronegative for autoantibodies (autoAbs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined 58 RPL patients with autoAbs (ANA, anti-TPO, or APAs), 34 RPL patients without autoAbs, and 58 healthy women with prior successful pregnancies and without autoantibodies. The levels of 25 (OH) D were measured using the sandwich ELISA technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed insufficient serum 25(OH) D levels in study groups, with significantly lower levels observed in RPL patients with or without autoAbs compared to healthy women (P=0.0006). In addition, RPL patients with autoAbs had significantly lower 25(OH) D levels compared to RPL patients without autoAbs. We also found that serum levels of 25(OH) D in RPL patients with autoAbs were significantly lower than in RPL patients without autoAbs (20.51 ± 1.15 ng/ml Vs. 23.69 ± 0.74 ng/ml, <i>P</i>=0.0356). Further analysis indicated that RPL patients who were positive for ANA, and APAs, except anti-TPO, had significantly lower than 25(OH)D serum levels than RPL patients without autoAbs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that RPL patients, especially those with APAs or ANA, have lower vitamin D levels compared to healthy women. This may indicate a link between maternal immune dysregulation due to vitamin D deficiency and the presence of autoantibodies in RPL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"266-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.2.266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.2.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究的目的是比较自身抗体(autoAbs)血清阳性或阴性的有复发性妊娠失败(RPL)病史的非怀孕妇女的维生素 D 水平:该研究对58名有自身抗体(ANA、抗TPO或APAs)的RPL患者、34名无自身抗体的RPL患者以及58名曾成功妊娠且无自身抗体的健康女性进行了检查。采用夹心酶联免疫吸附技术测量了 25 (OH) D 的水平:结果表明,研究组的血清 25(OH)D 水平不足,与健康女性相比,有或无自身抗体的 RPL 患者的血清 25(OH)D 水平明显较低(P=0.0006)。此外,与无自身抗体的 RPL 患者相比,患有自身抗体的 RPL 患者的 25(OH) D 水平明显较低。我们还发现,患有自身抗体的 RPL 患者的血清 25(OH) D 水平明显低于无自身抗体的 RPL 患者(20.51 ± 1.15 ng/ml Vs. 23.69 ± 0.74 ng/ml,P=0.0356)。进一步分析表明,ANA和APA(抗-TPO除外)阳性的RPL患者的25(OH)D血清水平明显低于无自身抗体的RPL患者:这些研究结果表明,与健康女性相比,RPL 患者,尤其是 APA 或 ANA 阳性者,维生素 D 水平较低。这可能表明,维生素 D 缺乏导致的母体免疫调节失调与 RPL 中自身抗体的存在之间存在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vitamin D levels in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss with and without autoantibodies.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the levels of vitamin D in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who were seropositive or seronegative for autoantibodies (autoAbs).

Methods: The study examined 58 RPL patients with autoAbs (ANA, anti-TPO, or APAs), 34 RPL patients without autoAbs, and 58 healthy women with prior successful pregnancies and without autoantibodies. The levels of 25 (OH) D were measured using the sandwich ELISA technique.

Results: Our results showed insufficient serum 25(OH) D levels in study groups, with significantly lower levels observed in RPL patients with or without autoAbs compared to healthy women (P=0.0006). In addition, RPL patients with autoAbs had significantly lower 25(OH) D levels compared to RPL patients without autoAbs. We also found that serum levels of 25(OH) D in RPL patients with autoAbs were significantly lower than in RPL patients without autoAbs (20.51 ± 1.15 ng/ml Vs. 23.69 ± 0.74 ng/ml, P=0.0356). Further analysis indicated that RPL patients who were positive for ANA, and APAs, except anti-TPO, had significantly lower than 25(OH)D serum levels than RPL patients without autoAbs.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that RPL patients, especially those with APAs or ANA, have lower vitamin D levels compared to healthy women. This may indicate a link between maternal immune dysregulation due to vitamin D deficiency and the presence of autoantibodies in RPL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信