首次发病的精神病患者的神经心理学特征及其与临床、元认知和社会认知变量的关系。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Victoria Espinosa, Alana Bagaeva, Raquel López-Carrilero, Ana Barajas, María Luisa Barrigón, Irene Birulés, Eva Frígola-Capell, Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, Fermín González-Higueras, Eva Grasa, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Zotes, Ester Lorente-Rovira, Trinidad Pélaez, Esther Pousa, Isabel Ruiz-Delgado, Marina Verdaguer-Rodríguez, Susana Ochoa
{"title":"首次发病的精神病患者的神经心理学特征及其与临床、元认知和社会认知变量的关系。","authors":"Victoria Espinosa, Alana Bagaeva, Raquel López-Carrilero, Ana Barajas, María Luisa Barrigón, Irene Birulés, Eva Frígola-Capell, Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, Fermín González-Higueras, Eva Grasa, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Zotes, Ester Lorente-Rovira, Trinidad Pélaez, Esther Pousa, Isabel Ruiz-Delgado, Marina Verdaguer-Rodríguez, Susana Ochoa","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01813-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing interest in the assessment of neuropsychological performance variability in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) has emerged. However, its association with clinical and functional outcomes requires further study. Furthermore, FEP neuropsychological subgroups have not been characterized by clinical insight or metacognition and social cognition domains. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify specific groups of patients with FEP based on neuropsychological variables and to compare their sociodemographic, clinical, metacognition and social cognition profiles. A sample of 149 FEP was recruited from adult mental health services. Neuropsychological performance was assessed by a neuropsychological battery (WAIS-III; TMT; WSCT; Stroop Test; TAVEC). The assessment also included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical, functional, metacognition and social cognition variables. Two distinct neuropsychological profiles emerged: one neuropsychological impaired cluster (N = 56) and one relatively intact cluster (N = 93). Significant differences were found between both profiles in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (age and level of education) (p = 0.001), clinical symptoms (negative, positive, disorganized, excitement and anxiety) (p = 0.041-0.001), clinical insight (p = 0.038-0.017), global functioning (p = 0.014), as well as in social cognition domains (emotional processing and theory of mind) (p = 0.001; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in metacognitive variables (cognitive insight and 'jumping to conclusions' bias). Relationship between neurocognitive impairment, social cognition and metacognition deficits are discussed. Early identifying of neuropsychological profiles in FEP, characterized by significant differences in clinical and social cognition variables, could provide insight into the prognosis and guide the implementation of tailored early-intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"701-713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological profiles in first-episodes psychosis and their relationship with clinical, metacognition and social cognition variables.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Espinosa, Alana Bagaeva, Raquel López-Carrilero, Ana Barajas, María Luisa Barrigón, Irene Birulés, Eva Frígola-Capell, Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, Fermín González-Higueras, Eva Grasa, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Zotes, Ester Lorente-Rovira, Trinidad Pélaez, Esther Pousa, Isabel Ruiz-Delgado, Marina Verdaguer-Rodríguez, Susana Ochoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00406-024-01813-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An increasing interest in the assessment of neuropsychological performance variability in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) has emerged. However, its association with clinical and functional outcomes requires further study. Furthermore, FEP neuropsychological subgroups have not been characterized by clinical insight or metacognition and social cognition domains. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify specific groups of patients with FEP based on neuropsychological variables and to compare their sociodemographic, clinical, metacognition and social cognition profiles. A sample of 149 FEP was recruited from adult mental health services. Neuropsychological performance was assessed by a neuropsychological battery (WAIS-III; TMT; WSCT; Stroop Test; TAVEC). The assessment also included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical, functional, metacognition and social cognition variables. Two distinct neuropsychological profiles emerged: one neuropsychological impaired cluster (N = 56) and one relatively intact cluster (N = 93). Significant differences were found between both profiles in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (age and level of education) (p = 0.001), clinical symptoms (negative, positive, disorganized, excitement and anxiety) (p = 0.041-0.001), clinical insight (p = 0.038-0.017), global functioning (p = 0.014), as well as in social cognition domains (emotional processing and theory of mind) (p = 0.001; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in metacognitive variables (cognitive insight and 'jumping to conclusions' bias). Relationship between neurocognitive impairment, social cognition and metacognition deficits are discussed. Early identifying of neuropsychological profiles in FEP, characterized by significant differences in clinical and social cognition variables, could provide insight into the prognosis and guide the implementation of tailored early-intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"701-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01813-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01813-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对首发精神病(FEP)患者神经心理学表现变异性的评估越来越感兴趣。然而,其与临床和功能结果之间的关联还需要进一步研究。此外,FEP 神经心理学亚组还没有以临床洞察力或元认知和社会认知领域为特征。这项探索性研究旨在根据神经心理学变量确定 FEP 患者的特定群体,并比较他们的社会人口学、临床、元认知和社会认知概况。研究从成人心理健康服务机构招募了 149 名 FEP 患者。他们的神经心理学表现由一组神经心理学测验(WAIS-III;TMT;WSCT;Stroop Test;TAVEC)进行评估。评估还包括社会人口特征、临床、功能、元认知和社会认知变量。结果发现了两种截然不同的神经心理学特征:一个神经心理学受损群组(56 人)和一个相对完好群组(93 人)。在社会人口学特征(年龄和受教育程度)(p = 0.001)、临床症状(阴性、阳性、紊乱、兴奋和焦虑)(p = 0.041-0.001)、临床洞察力(p = 0.038-0.017)、整体功能(p = 0.014)以及社会认知领域(情绪处理和心智理论)(p = 0.001; p = 0.002)方面,这两种特征之间存在显著差异。元认知变量(认知洞察力和 "匆忙下结论 "偏差)没有发现明显差异。本文讨论了神经认知障碍、社会认知和元认知缺陷之间的关系。早期识别以临床和社会认知变量显著差异为特征的 FEP 神经心理学特征,可为预后提供洞察力,并指导实施有针对性的早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neuropsychological profiles in first-episodes psychosis and their relationship with clinical, metacognition and social cognition variables.

Neuropsychological profiles in first-episodes psychosis and their relationship with clinical, metacognition and social cognition variables.

An increasing interest in the assessment of neuropsychological performance variability in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) has emerged. However, its association with clinical and functional outcomes requires further study. Furthermore, FEP neuropsychological subgroups have not been characterized by clinical insight or metacognition and social cognition domains. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify specific groups of patients with FEP based on neuropsychological variables and to compare their sociodemographic, clinical, metacognition and social cognition profiles. A sample of 149 FEP was recruited from adult mental health services. Neuropsychological performance was assessed by a neuropsychological battery (WAIS-III; TMT; WSCT; Stroop Test; TAVEC). The assessment also included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical, functional, metacognition and social cognition variables. Two distinct neuropsychological profiles emerged: one neuropsychological impaired cluster (N = 56) and one relatively intact cluster (N = 93). Significant differences were found between both profiles in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (age and level of education) (p = 0.001), clinical symptoms (negative, positive, disorganized, excitement and anxiety) (p = 0.041-0.001), clinical insight (p = 0.038-0.017), global functioning (p = 0.014), as well as in social cognition domains (emotional processing and theory of mind) (p = 0.001; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in metacognitive variables (cognitive insight and 'jumping to conclusions' bias). Relationship between neurocognitive impairment, social cognition and metacognition deficits are discussed. Early identifying of neuropsychological profiles in FEP, characterized by significant differences in clinical and social cognition variables, could provide insight into the prognosis and guide the implementation of tailored early-intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信