社会对水产养殖的看法:结合范围审查和媒体分析

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Mausam Budhathoki, Sezgin Tunca, Raquel Lopez Martinez, Wenbo Zhang, Saihong Li, Bertrand Le Gallic, Karen Brunsø, Priya Sharma, Piotr Eljasik, Gergo Gyalog, Remigiusz Panicz, David Little
{"title":"社会对水产养殖的看法:结合范围审查和媒体分析","authors":"Mausam Budhathoki,&nbsp;Sezgin Tunca,&nbsp;Raquel Lopez Martinez,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhang,&nbsp;Saihong Li,&nbsp;Bertrand Le Gallic,&nbsp;Karen Brunsø,&nbsp;Priya Sharma,&nbsp;Piotr Eljasik,&nbsp;Gergo Gyalog,&nbsp;Remigiusz Panicz,&nbsp;David Little","doi":"10.1111/raq.12927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquaculture has been recognised for achieving multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; its further growth depends on understanding, and responding to, societal perceptions in a broader context. Thus, this study aims to understand societal perceptions of aquaculture through a scoping review and media analysis. A scoping review identified 151 academic studies for inclusion in our five identified research clusters: (1) social acceptability, (2) growth and development, (3) media coverage, (4) sustainable aquaculture, and (5) consumer perceptions. Further, newspaper articles (<i>n</i> = 100) were sampled from the United Kingdom, Denmark, France, Spain, Turkey, and China; elsewhere all articles identified were included (Poland, 79; Hungary, 29; India, 70). The findings suggest that scientific and newspaper articles tend to present sustainability aspects in a simplified form. Key stakeholder groups include fish farming enterprises, civil society, governmental officials, scientists, and business leaders both within aquaculture value chains (retailers/wholesalers, technology industry) and outside of them (fisheries, tourism). Also, other stakeholders included the public (indigenous groups, residents, consumers). The stakeholder groups perceived aquaculture differently and depending on the circumstances and context, their perceptions ranged from positive to negative. Many factors influenced their perceptions, including aquaculture's impact on multiple sustainability dimensions, knowledge, transparency, personal interests, types, and location of aquaculture practises, regulations, experience, and sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, and income. We recommend that aquaculture practitioners focus on context-specific multifaceted strategies—prioritising transparency, communication, and accountability—and provide essential knowledge to ensure that societal perceptions of aquaculture are based on accurate, empirical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 4","pages":"1879-1900"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12927","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Societal perceptions of aquaculture: Combining scoping review and media analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mausam Budhathoki,&nbsp;Sezgin Tunca,&nbsp;Raquel Lopez Martinez,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhang,&nbsp;Saihong Li,&nbsp;Bertrand Le Gallic,&nbsp;Karen Brunsø,&nbsp;Priya Sharma,&nbsp;Piotr Eljasik,&nbsp;Gergo Gyalog,&nbsp;Remigiusz Panicz,&nbsp;David Little\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/raq.12927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aquaculture has been recognised for achieving multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; its further growth depends on understanding, and responding to, societal perceptions in a broader context. Thus, this study aims to understand societal perceptions of aquaculture through a scoping review and media analysis. A scoping review identified 151 academic studies for inclusion in our five identified research clusters: (1) social acceptability, (2) growth and development, (3) media coverage, (4) sustainable aquaculture, and (5) consumer perceptions. Further, newspaper articles (<i>n</i> = 100) were sampled from the United Kingdom, Denmark, France, Spain, Turkey, and China; elsewhere all articles identified were included (Poland, 79; Hungary, 29; India, 70). The findings suggest that scientific and newspaper articles tend to present sustainability aspects in a simplified form. Key stakeholder groups include fish farming enterprises, civil society, governmental officials, scientists, and business leaders both within aquaculture value chains (retailers/wholesalers, technology industry) and outside of them (fisheries, tourism). Also, other stakeholders included the public (indigenous groups, residents, consumers). The stakeholder groups perceived aquaculture differently and depending on the circumstances and context, their perceptions ranged from positive to negative. Many factors influenced their perceptions, including aquaculture's impact on multiple sustainability dimensions, knowledge, transparency, personal interests, types, and location of aquaculture practises, regulations, experience, and sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, and income. We recommend that aquaculture practitioners focus on context-specific multifaceted strategies—prioritising transparency, communication, and accountability—and provide essential knowledge to ensure that societal perceptions of aquaculture are based on accurate, empirical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"1879-1900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12927\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12927\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12927","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水产养殖业因实现多个联合国可持续发展目标而得到认可;其进一步发展取决于在更广泛的背景下了解和应对社会观念。因此,本研究旨在通过范围审查和媒体分析了解社会对水产养殖的看法。范围审查确定了151项学术研究,纳入我们确定的五个研究集群:(1)社会接受度,(2)增长和发展,(3)媒体报道,(4)可持续水产养殖,以及(5)消费者认知。此外,还从英国、丹麦、法国、西班牙、土耳其和中国抽取了报纸文章(n = 100);在其他地方,所有确定的文章都包括在内(波兰,79篇;匈牙利,29篇;印度,70篇)。研究结果表明,科学和报纸文章倾向于以简化的形式介绍可持续发展方面的内容。主要利益相关者群体包括水产养殖价值链内(零售商/批发商、技术行业)和价值链外(渔业、旅游业)的养鱼企业、公民社会、政府官员、科学家和商业领袖。此外,其他利益相关者还包括公众(土著群体、居民、消费者)。利益相关者群体对水产养殖有不同的看法,视情况和背景而定,他们的看法从 积极到消极不等。影响他们看法的因素很多,包括水产养殖对多个可持续性维度的影响、知识、透明度、个人兴趣、水产养殖实践的类型和地点、法规、经验以及社会人口特征,如年龄、性别、教育和收入。我们建议水产养殖从业者关注针对具体情况的多方面战略,优先考虑透明度、沟通和问责制,并提供必要的知识,确保社会对水产养殖的看法建立在准确的经验信息基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Societal perceptions of aquaculture: Combining scoping review and media analysis

Societal perceptions of aquaculture: Combining scoping review and media analysis

Aquaculture has been recognised for achieving multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; its further growth depends on understanding, and responding to, societal perceptions in a broader context. Thus, this study aims to understand societal perceptions of aquaculture through a scoping review and media analysis. A scoping review identified 151 academic studies for inclusion in our five identified research clusters: (1) social acceptability, (2) growth and development, (3) media coverage, (4) sustainable aquaculture, and (5) consumer perceptions. Further, newspaper articles (n = 100) were sampled from the United Kingdom, Denmark, France, Spain, Turkey, and China; elsewhere all articles identified were included (Poland, 79; Hungary, 29; India, 70). The findings suggest that scientific and newspaper articles tend to present sustainability aspects in a simplified form. Key stakeholder groups include fish farming enterprises, civil society, governmental officials, scientists, and business leaders both within aquaculture value chains (retailers/wholesalers, technology industry) and outside of them (fisheries, tourism). Also, other stakeholders included the public (indigenous groups, residents, consumers). The stakeholder groups perceived aquaculture differently and depending on the circumstances and context, their perceptions ranged from positive to negative. Many factors influenced their perceptions, including aquaculture's impact on multiple sustainability dimensions, knowledge, transparency, personal interests, types, and location of aquaculture practises, regulations, experience, and sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, and income. We recommend that aquaculture practitioners focus on context-specific multifaceted strategies—prioritising transparency, communication, and accountability—and provide essential knowledge to ensure that societal perceptions of aquaculture are based on accurate, empirical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信