在真实世界环境中对老年哮喘患者使用生物疗法的疗效、安全性和持续性:回顾性观察研究

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yonago acta medica Pub Date : 2024-04-22 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.33160/yam.2024.05.003
Ryota Okazaki, Tomoya Harada, Yoshihiro Funaki, Masato Morita, Miki Takata, Hiroki Kohno, Hiroki Ishikawa, Genki Inui, Miyu Nishigami, Mitsuhiro Yamamoto, Aditya Sri Listyoko, Akira Yamasaki
{"title":"在真实世界环境中对老年哮喘患者使用生物疗法的疗效、安全性和持续性:回顾性观察研究","authors":"Ryota Okazaki, Tomoya Harada, Yoshihiro Funaki, Masato Morita, Miki Takata, Hiroki Kohno, Hiroki Ishikawa, Genki Inui, Miyu Nishigami, Mitsuhiro Yamamoto, Aditya Sri Listyoko, Akira Yamasaki","doi":"10.33160/yam.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major randomized clinical trials have shown that biological therapy can reduce the exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, data on the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy in older patients with asthma are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the continuation rate, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (≥ 65 years) and younger (< 65 years) patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected clinical data of patients with asthma who were administered biological drugs such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab between April 2009 and August 2022. We comparatively analyzed the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger patient (age < 65 years) groups. The reasons for discontinuation or switching of biological drugs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two (31 older and 31 younger) patients were treated with 91 biologics during the observational period. The mean age of older patients was 74.3 ± 5.1 years and that of younger patients was 48.0 ± 14.0 years. The continuation rate of biological therapy was not significantly different between the groups. Social background was the most common reason for discontinuation of biological therapy in both groups, and insufficient effect was the most common reason for switching to biological drugs. Asthma exacerbations decreased in both groups within the first 12 months of biologic therapy. The dosage of OCS tended to decrease in the older group and significantly decrease in the younger group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biologic therapy for older patients with asthma can be continued, with efficacy and safety similar to those in younger patients with asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":"67 2","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy, Safety, and Continuation of Biological Therapy in Older Patients with Asthma in a Real-World Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Okazaki, Tomoya Harada, Yoshihiro Funaki, Masato Morita, Miki Takata, Hiroki Kohno, Hiroki Ishikawa, Genki Inui, Miyu Nishigami, Mitsuhiro Yamamoto, Aditya Sri Listyoko, Akira Yamasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.33160/yam.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major randomized clinical trials have shown that biological therapy can reduce the exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, data on the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy in older patients with asthma are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the continuation rate, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (≥ 65 years) and younger (< 65 years) patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected clinical data of patients with asthma who were administered biological drugs such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab between April 2009 and August 2022. We comparatively analyzed the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger patient (age < 65 years) groups. The reasons for discontinuation or switching of biological drugs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two (31 older and 31 younger) patients were treated with 91 biologics during the observational period. The mean age of older patients was 74.3 ± 5.1 years and that of younger patients was 48.0 ± 14.0 years. The continuation rate of biological therapy was not significantly different between the groups. Social background was the most common reason for discontinuation of biological therapy in both groups, and insufficient effect was the most common reason for switching to biological drugs. Asthma exacerbations decreased in both groups within the first 12 months of biologic therapy. The dosage of OCS tended to decrease in the older group and significantly decrease in the younger group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biologic therapy for older patients with asthma can be continued, with efficacy and safety similar to those in younger patients with asthma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yonago acta medica\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"114-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yonago acta medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2024.05.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2024.05.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:主要的随机临床试验表明,生物疗法可以降低严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的病情恶化率和口服皮质类固醇(OCS)的用量。然而,有关生物疗法在老年哮喘患者中的持续性、有效性和安全性的数据却很有限。因此,本研究旨在评估老年(≥ 65 岁)和年轻(< 65 岁)哮喘患者在生物疗法的持续率、疗效和安全性方面的差异:在这项单中心回顾性观察研究中,我们收集了 2009 年 4 月至 2022 年 8 月期间使用奥马珠单抗、美博利珠单抗、苯拉珠单抗和杜匹单抗等生物药物的哮喘患者的临床数据。我们比较分析了老年组(年龄≥ 65 岁)和年轻组(年龄< 65 岁)患者继续使用生物疗法的情况、疗效和安全性。我们还评估了停用或更换生物药物的原因:在观察期间,62 名患者(31 名老年患者和 31 名年轻患者)接受了 91 种生物制剂的治疗。老年患者的平均年龄为(74.3 ± 5.1)岁,年轻患者的平均年龄为(48.0 ± 14.0)岁。两组患者继续接受生物制剂治疗的比例无明显差异。社会背景是两组患者停止生物治疗的最常见原因,而疗效不佳是转用生物药物的最常见原因。两组患者在接受生物治疗的头 12 个月内,哮喘加重的情况都有所减少。老年组患者的OCS用量趋于减少,而年轻组患者的OCS用量则明显减少:结论:老年哮喘患者可以继续接受生物制剂治疗,其疗效和安全性与年轻哮喘患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy, Safety, and Continuation of Biological Therapy in Older Patients with Asthma in a Real-World Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Major randomized clinical trials have shown that biological therapy can reduce the exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, data on the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy in older patients with asthma are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the continuation rate, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (≥ 65 years) and younger (< 65 years) patients with asthma.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected clinical data of patients with asthma who were administered biological drugs such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab between April 2009 and August 2022. We comparatively analyzed the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger patient (age < 65 years) groups. The reasons for discontinuation or switching of biological drugs were also evaluated.

Results: Sixty-two (31 older and 31 younger) patients were treated with 91 biologics during the observational period. The mean age of older patients was 74.3 ± 5.1 years and that of younger patients was 48.0 ± 14.0 years. The continuation rate of biological therapy was not significantly different between the groups. Social background was the most common reason for discontinuation of biological therapy in both groups, and insufficient effect was the most common reason for switching to biological drugs. Asthma exacerbations decreased in both groups within the first 12 months of biologic therapy. The dosage of OCS tended to decrease in the older group and significantly decrease in the younger group.

Conclusion: Biologic therapy for older patients with asthma can be continued, with efficacy and safety similar to those in younger patients with asthma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yonago acta medica
Yonago acta medica MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan. The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education. Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community. Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信