美国 50 岁及以上成年人的植牙和植牙修复趋势,1999-2020 年全国健康与营养调查。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Darien J. Weatherspoon DDS, MPH, Haiyan Chen MD, PhD, Bruce A. Dye DDS, MPH
{"title":"美国 50 岁及以上成年人的植牙和植牙修复趋势,1999-2020 年全国健康与营养调查。","authors":"Darien J. Weatherspoon DDS, MPH,&nbsp;Haiyan Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Bruce A. Dye DDS, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental implants are an important treatment option in contemporary clinical dentistry. The objective of this study was to determine trends in the prevalence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations in adults 50 years and older across demographic groups over a 20-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected during 1999-2004, 2009-2014, and 2015-2020 for analyses. The authors used data from 2011 through 2020 to analyze implant-supported restoration trends. Participants 50 years or older were included in the study analytic sample. The primary outcome was the presence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations. Covariates assessed included dentition status, age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, poverty status, and smoking status. The authors used population estimates, weighted percentages, SEs, and logistic regression models for study analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a total of 17,114 adults from 1999 through 2020 and 11,292 adults from 2011 through 2020 meeting the inclusion criteria. The prevalence (SE) of at least 1 dental implant increased over time, from 1.3% (0.22%) in 1999-2004 to 8.4% (0.68%) in 2015-2020. In general, those who were non-Hispanic Black, experiencing poverty, and had less than a college education were less likely to have implants than their counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although the overall prevalence of implants has increased over time, disparities in prevalence were observed among certain demographic groups.</p></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><p>The use of dental implants in clinical dentistry has increased over time. Future research and policy initiatives could help address disparities in implant prevalence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant and implant restoration trends among adults 50 years and older in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2020\",\"authors\":\"Darien J. Weatherspoon DDS, MPH,&nbsp;Haiyan Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Bruce A. Dye DDS, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental implants are an important treatment option in contemporary clinical dentistry. The objective of this study was to determine trends in the prevalence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations in adults 50 years and older across demographic groups over a 20-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected during 1999-2004, 2009-2014, and 2015-2020 for analyses. The authors used data from 2011 through 2020 to analyze implant-supported restoration trends. Participants 50 years or older were included in the study analytic sample. The primary outcome was the presence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations. Covariates assessed included dentition status, age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, poverty status, and smoking status. The authors used population estimates, weighted percentages, SEs, and logistic regression models for study analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a total of 17,114 adults from 1999 through 2020 and 11,292 adults from 2011 through 2020 meeting the inclusion criteria. The prevalence (SE) of at least 1 dental implant increased over time, from 1.3% (0.22%) in 1999-2004 to 8.4% (0.68%) in 2015-2020. In general, those who were non-Hispanic Black, experiencing poverty, and had less than a college education were less likely to have implants than their counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although the overall prevalence of implants has increased over time, disparities in prevalence were observed among certain demographic groups.</p></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><p>The use of dental implants in clinical dentistry has increased over time. Future research and policy initiatives could help address disparities in implant prevalence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724001867\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724001867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:种植牙是当代临床牙科的一种重要治疗方法。本研究的目的是确定不同人口群体中 50 岁及以上成年人种植牙和种植体支持修复的流行趋势,时间跨度为 20 年:作者使用1999-2004年、2009-2014年和2015-2020年期间收集的全国健康与营养调查数据进行分析。作者使用 2011 年至 2020 年的数据分析了种植体支持修复趋势。研究分析样本中包括 50 岁或以上的参与者。主要结果是是否有种植牙和种植体支持的修复体。评估的协变量包括牙齿状况、年龄、性别、种族和民族、教育程度、贫困状况和吸烟状况。作者使用人口估计值、加权百分比、SE 和逻辑回归模型进行研究分析:从 1999 年到 2020 年共有 17114 名成年人符合纳入标准,从 2011 年到 2020 年共有 11292 名成年人符合纳入标准。随着时间的推移,至少种植 1 颗牙齿的患病率(SE)从 1999-2004 年的 1.3%(0.22%)上升到 2015-2020 年的 8.4%(0.68%)。一般来说,非西班牙裔黑人、贫困人口和大学教育程度以下的人比同龄人更不可能种植牙:结论:尽管随着时间的推移,种植体的总体流行率有所上升,但在某些人口群体中却发现了流行率的差异:实际意义:随着时间的推移,种植牙在临床牙科中的使用有所增加。未来的研究和政策措施将有助于解决种植牙普及率的差异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant and implant restoration trends among adults 50 years and older in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2020

Background

Dental implants are an important treatment option in contemporary clinical dentistry. The objective of this study was to determine trends in the prevalence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations in adults 50 years and older across demographic groups over a 20-year period.

Methods

The authors used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected during 1999-2004, 2009-2014, and 2015-2020 for analyses. The authors used data from 2011 through 2020 to analyze implant-supported restoration trends. Participants 50 years or older were included in the study analytic sample. The primary outcome was the presence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations. Covariates assessed included dentition status, age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, poverty status, and smoking status. The authors used population estimates, weighted percentages, SEs, and logistic regression models for study analyses.

Results

There was a total of 17,114 adults from 1999 through 2020 and 11,292 adults from 2011 through 2020 meeting the inclusion criteria. The prevalence (SE) of at least 1 dental implant increased over time, from 1.3% (0.22%) in 1999-2004 to 8.4% (0.68%) in 2015-2020. In general, those who were non-Hispanic Black, experiencing poverty, and had less than a college education were less likely to have implants than their counterparts.

Conclusions

Although the overall prevalence of implants has increased over time, disparities in prevalence were observed among certain demographic groups.

Practical Implications

The use of dental implants in clinical dentistry has increased over time. Future research and policy initiatives could help address disparities in implant prevalence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信