Sonographic risk stratification of FDG-avid thyroid nodules using the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System

Introduction

The increasing usage of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detection and monitoring of malignancy has led to an increase in incidental detection of thyroid nodules. Nodules that demonstrate increased avidity for 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) have been shown to carry a high incidence of malignancy and warrant further investigation. At present, there has been limited research on the risk stratification of FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the ACR TIRADS classification in the risk stratification of such nodules.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively for FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas over a 10-year period. Nodules were characterised using the TIRADS classification and, subsequently, underwent fine-needle aspirate cytology. Cytological findings were classified using the Bethesda reporting system. Non-diagnostic samples (Bethesda class I) were excluded. The remaining samples were divided into two groups: benign (Bethesda class II) or suspicious for malignancy/malignant (Bethesda class III or above).

Results

Thirty-six percent of low-risk nodules and 45% of high-risk nodules were malignant, respectively (P = 0.516). The sensitivity and specificity of TIRADS for detection of malignant nodules were 56% and 54%, respectively. There were no malignant TIRADS 1 or 2 nodules. The absence of any suspicious sonographic features had a 1.0 negative predictive value.

Conclusions

FDG-avid nodules classified as TIRADS 1 or 2 or have no suspicious ultrasound features have a 0% incidence of malignancy and thus may not require further assessment with fine-needle aspirate cytology (FNA) when detected incidentally. FDG-avid nodules that are TIRADS 3 or above should undergo FNA regardless of size due to the high risk of malignancy and poor sensitivity of the TIRADS classification system.