肝细胞癌解剖性肝脏切除术对预防术后早期局部复发的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Akira Shimizu, Koji Kubota, Tsuyoshi Notake, Noriyuki Kitagawa, Hitoshi Masuo, Takahiro Yoshizawa, Hiroki Sakai, Hikaru Hayashi, Shiori Yamazaki, Yuji Soejima
{"title":"肝细胞癌解剖性肝脏切除术对预防术后早期局部复发的影响。","authors":"Akira Shimizu,&nbsp;Koji Kubota,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Notake,&nbsp;Noriyuki Kitagawa,&nbsp;Hitoshi Masuo,&nbsp;Takahiro Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Hiroki Sakai,&nbsp;Hikaru Hayashi,&nbsp;Shiori Yamazaki,&nbsp;Yuji Soejima","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The superiority of anatomical liver resection (AR) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over nonanatomical liver resection (NR) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of AR in preventing local and early HCC recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 280 patients who underwent initial liver resection for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter were categorized into the AR and NR groups and compared using propensity score matching analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between the matched pairs (<i>n</i> = 87 in each group), the incidence rates of local and early (recurrence within 2 years after surgery) recurrences in the AR group were significantly lower than those in the NR group (13.8% vs. 28.7%, <i>p</i> = .025; 20.7% vs. 35.6%, <i>p</i> = .028, respectively). The overall survival in the AR group was better than that in the NR group (median: 13.4 vs. 7.6 years, <i>p</i> = .003). NR was among independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1–3.6, <i>p</i> = .023) and prognostic factors for local recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.4–4.4, <i>p</i> = .003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AR is superior in controlling local and early recurrence postoperatively for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter compared with NR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhbp.12004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in preventing early-phase local recurrence after surgery\",\"authors\":\"Akira Shimizu,&nbsp;Koji Kubota,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Notake,&nbsp;Noriyuki Kitagawa,&nbsp;Hitoshi Masuo,&nbsp;Takahiro Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Hiroki Sakai,&nbsp;Hikaru Hayashi,&nbsp;Shiori Yamazaki,&nbsp;Yuji Soejima\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The superiority of anatomical liver resection (AR) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over nonanatomical liver resection (NR) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of AR in preventing local and early HCC recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 280 patients who underwent initial liver resection for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter were categorized into the AR and NR groups and compared using propensity score matching analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between the matched pairs (<i>n</i> = 87 in each group), the incidence rates of local and early (recurrence within 2 years after surgery) recurrences in the AR group were significantly lower than those in the NR group (13.8% vs. 28.7%, <i>p</i> = .025; 20.7% vs. 35.6%, <i>p</i> = .028, respectively). The overall survival in the AR group was better than that in the NR group (median: 13.4 vs. 7.6 years, <i>p</i> = .003). NR was among independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1–3.6, <i>p</i> = .023) and prognostic factors for local recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.4–4.4, <i>p</i> = .003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>AR is superior in controlling local and early recurrence postoperatively for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter compared with NR.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhbp.12004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:解剖性肝切除术(AR)治疗局部肝细胞癌(HCC)优于非解剖性肝切除术(NR)仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨AR对预防局部和早期HCC复发的影响:方法:将280例因单发HCC直径≤5厘米而接受初次肝切除术的患者分为AR组和NR组,并采用倾向评分匹配分析法进行比较:结果:在配对组(每组87人)中,AR组的局部复发率和早期复发率(术后2年内复发)明显低于NR组(分别为13.8% vs. 28.7%,p = .025;20.7% vs. 35.6%,p = .028)。AR组的总生存期优于NR组(中位数:13.4年对7.6年,P = .003)。NR是早期复发的独立危险因素(几率比:1.98,95% CI:1.1-3.6,p = .023)和局部复发的预后因素(危险比:2.44,95% CI:1.4-4.4,p = .003):结论:与NR相比,AR在控制直径≤5厘米的单发HCC术后局部和早期复发方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in preventing early-phase local recurrence after surgery

Impact of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in preventing early-phase local recurrence after surgery

Background

The superiority of anatomical liver resection (AR) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over nonanatomical liver resection (NR) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of AR in preventing local and early HCC recurrence.

Methods

A total of 280 patients who underwent initial liver resection for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter were categorized into the AR and NR groups and compared using propensity score matching analysis.

Results

Between the matched pairs (n = 87 in each group), the incidence rates of local and early (recurrence within 2 years after surgery) recurrences in the AR group were significantly lower than those in the NR group (13.8% vs. 28.7%, p = .025; 20.7% vs. 35.6%, p = .028, respectively). The overall survival in the AR group was better than that in the NR group (median: 13.4 vs. 7.6 years, p = .003). NR was among independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1–3.6, p = .023) and prognostic factors for local recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.4–4.4, p = .003).

Conclusion

AR is superior in controlling local and early recurrence postoperatively for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter compared with NR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信