蛋白血清生物标志物在区分肺部可疑病变患者的小细胞肺癌和非小细胞肺癌方面的诊断潜力。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Biomarkers Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1080/1354750X.2024.2360038
Luz Fernanda Sua, Silvia J Serrano-Gomez, Marcela Nuñez, María A Amezquita-Dussan, Liliana Fernández-Trujillo
{"title":"蛋白血清生物标志物在区分肺部可疑病变患者的小细胞肺癌和非小细胞肺癌方面的诊断潜力。","authors":"Luz Fernanda Sua, Silvia J Serrano-Gomez, Marcela Nuñez, María A Amezquita-Dussan, Liliana Fernández-Trujillo","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2024.2360038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomarkers play a role in identifying, managing, and predicting cancer outcomes. In lung cancer, they are used at various time points. Doubts remain regarding their accuracy for differential diagnosis and histological subtyping. A diagnostic test study was conducted. It included malignant lesions and controls with benign lesions. Before lung biopsy, all patients had the following biomarkers measured in serum (Pro-GRP,NSE,CYFRA21-1,SCC-Ag,CEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The predictive capacity of serum biomarkers was evaluated to discriminate between lung cancer and benign pathology. The accuracy was also assessed for distinguishing between SCLC and NSCLC and explored their ability to perform histological subtyping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 patients were included, 60 with lung cancer, 33 with benign pathology. Pro-GRP and NSE were elevated in SCLC compared with NSCLC or nonmalignant disease. The most accurate for differentiating between malignant and benign pathology were CEA and CYFRA21-1. Pro-GRP had a poor predictive capacity for distinguishing NSCLC from SCLC. However, combined with CEA and CYFRA21-1, performance improved. For SCLC, the diagnostic capacity of Pro-GRP increased by combining with biomarkers, such as NSE/CYFRA21-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biomarkers lacked the sensitivity and specificity for independent differential diagnosis or histological subtyping. However, the observed patterns in biomarker levels associated with specific histological subtypes suggest potential utility in a multi-biomarker approach or in conjunction with other diagnostic tools. This insight could guide future research to improve diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies in lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic potential of protein serum biomarkers for distinguishing small and non-small cell lung cancer in patients with suspicious lung lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Luz Fernanda Sua, Silvia J Serrano-Gomez, Marcela Nuñez, María A Amezquita-Dussan, Liliana Fernández-Trujillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1354750X.2024.2360038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomarkers play a role in identifying, managing, and predicting cancer outcomes. In lung cancer, they are used at various time points. Doubts remain regarding their accuracy for differential diagnosis and histological subtyping. A diagnostic test study was conducted. It included malignant lesions and controls with benign lesions. Before lung biopsy, all patients had the following biomarkers measured in serum (Pro-GRP,NSE,CYFRA21-1,SCC-Ag,CEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The predictive capacity of serum biomarkers was evaluated to discriminate between lung cancer and benign pathology. The accuracy was also assessed for distinguishing between SCLC and NSCLC and explored their ability to perform histological subtyping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 patients were included, 60 with lung cancer, 33 with benign pathology. Pro-GRP and NSE were elevated in SCLC compared with NSCLC or nonmalignant disease. The most accurate for differentiating between malignant and benign pathology were CEA and CYFRA21-1. Pro-GRP had a poor predictive capacity for distinguishing NSCLC from SCLC. However, combined with CEA and CYFRA21-1, performance improved. For SCLC, the diagnostic capacity of Pro-GRP increased by combining with biomarkers, such as NSE/CYFRA21-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biomarkers lacked the sensitivity and specificity for independent differential diagnosis or histological subtyping. However, the observed patterns in biomarker levels associated with specific histological subtypes suggest potential utility in a multi-biomarker approach or in conjunction with other diagnostic tools. This insight could guide future research to improve diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies in lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2024.2360038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2024.2360038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景生物标志物在识别、管理和预测癌症结果方面发挥着作用。在肺癌中,它们被用于不同的时间点。但它们在鉴别诊断和组织学亚型方面的准确性仍存在疑问。我们进行了一项诊断测试研究。研究对象包括恶性病变和良性病变对照组。方法评估了血清生物标志物在区分肺癌和良性病变方面的预测能力。结果 共纳入 93 例患者,其中 60 例为肺癌患者,33 例为良性病变患者。与 NSCLC 或非恶性疾病相比,SCLC 的 Pro-GRP 和 NSE 升高。最能准确区分恶性和良性病变的是 CEA 和 CYFRA21-1。Pro-GRP 对区分 NSCLC 和 SCLC 的预测能力较差。不过,与 CEA 和 CYFRA21-1 结合使用后,其效果有所改善。结论生物标志物缺乏独立鉴别诊断或组织学亚型的敏感性和特异性。生物标志物对独立鉴别诊断或组织学亚型缺乏敏感性和特异性,它们可能对医生有所帮助,但组织活检应及时完成,以获得明确诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic potential of protein serum biomarkers for distinguishing small and non-small cell lung cancer in patients with suspicious lung lesions.

Background: Biomarkers play a role in identifying, managing, and predicting cancer outcomes. In lung cancer, they are used at various time points. Doubts remain regarding their accuracy for differential diagnosis and histological subtyping. A diagnostic test study was conducted. It included malignant lesions and controls with benign lesions. Before lung biopsy, all patients had the following biomarkers measured in serum (Pro-GRP,NSE,CYFRA21-1,SCC-Ag,CEA).

Methods: The predictive capacity of serum biomarkers was evaluated to discriminate between lung cancer and benign pathology. The accuracy was also assessed for distinguishing between SCLC and NSCLC and explored their ability to perform histological subtyping.

Results: 93 patients were included, 60 with lung cancer, 33 with benign pathology. Pro-GRP and NSE were elevated in SCLC compared with NSCLC or nonmalignant disease. The most accurate for differentiating between malignant and benign pathology were CEA and CYFRA21-1. Pro-GRP had a poor predictive capacity for distinguishing NSCLC from SCLC. However, combined with CEA and CYFRA21-1, performance improved. For SCLC, the diagnostic capacity of Pro-GRP increased by combining with biomarkers, such as NSE/CYFRA21-1.

Conclusions: Biomarkers lacked the sensitivity and specificity for independent differential diagnosis or histological subtyping. However, the observed patterns in biomarker levels associated with specific histological subtypes suggest potential utility in a multi-biomarker approach or in conjunction with other diagnostic tools. This insight could guide future research to improve diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies in lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers
Biomarkers 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source. Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged: • Biomarkers of disease • Biomarkers of exposure • Biomarkers of response • Biomarkers of susceptibility Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信