衡量药物护理捆绑服务对患者疗效的影响:一项观察性研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Martin Luke Canning, Ross McDougall, Stephanie Yerkovich, Michael Barras, Ian Coombes, Clair Sullivan, Karen Whitfield
{"title":"衡量药物护理捆绑服务对患者疗效的影响:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Martin Luke Canning, Ross McDougall, Stephanie Yerkovich, Michael Barras, Ian Coombes, Clair Sullivan, Karen Whitfield","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01750-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical pharmacists perform activities to optimise medicines use and prevent patient harm. Historically, clinical pharmacy quality indicators have measured individual activities not linked to patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the proportion of patients who receive a pharmaceutical care bundle (PCB) (consisting of a medication history, medication review, discharge medication list and medicines information on the discharge summary) as well as investigate the relationship between delivery of this PCB and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pharmaceutical care bundle activities were defined within state-wide (Queensland, Australia) clinical information systems and datasets were linked. An observational study using routinely recorded data was performed at ten participating sites for adult patients who had a non-same day hospital stay. The association between extent of PCB delivery and three patient outcomes were investigated: length of stay (LOS), unplanned readmission, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 283,813 patient hospital stays were evaluated. The delivery of the PCB occurred in 26.9% of patients at the ten participating hospital sites, ranging from 0.6 to 61.2% across sites. Patients with a longer LOS were more likely to receive delivery of the complete PCB (P < 0.001). There was no correlation between PCB and hospital standardised mortality ratio (r = 0.03, p = 0.93). Higher rates of delivery of the PCB were associated with lower rates of unplanned readmission within 30 days (r = - 0.993, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A complete PCB was delivered to 26.9% of patients and was associated with a significantly lower rate of unplanned readmission within 30 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the impact of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery on patient outcomes: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Luke Canning, Ross McDougall, Stephanie Yerkovich, Michael Barras, Ian Coombes, Clair Sullivan, Karen Whitfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-024-01750-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical pharmacists perform activities to optimise medicines use and prevent patient harm. Historically, clinical pharmacy quality indicators have measured individual activities not linked to patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the proportion of patients who receive a pharmaceutical care bundle (PCB) (consisting of a medication history, medication review, discharge medication list and medicines information on the discharge summary) as well as investigate the relationship between delivery of this PCB and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pharmaceutical care bundle activities were defined within state-wide (Queensland, Australia) clinical information systems and datasets were linked. An observational study using routinely recorded data was performed at ten participating sites for adult patients who had a non-same day hospital stay. The association between extent of PCB delivery and three patient outcomes were investigated: length of stay (LOS), unplanned readmission, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 283,813 patient hospital stays were evaluated. The delivery of the PCB occurred in 26.9% of patients at the ten participating hospital sites, ranging from 0.6 to 61.2% across sites. Patients with a longer LOS were more likely to receive delivery of the complete PCB (P < 0.001). There was no correlation between PCB and hospital standardised mortality ratio (r = 0.03, p = 0.93). Higher rates of delivery of the PCB were associated with lower rates of unplanned readmission within 30 days (r = - 0.993, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A complete PCB was delivered to 26.9% of patients and was associated with a significantly lower rate of unplanned readmission within 30 days.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01750-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01750-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床药剂师的工作旨在优化药物使用和预防对患者的伤害。目的:确定接受药物护理包(PCB)(包括用药史、用药回顾、出院用药清单和出院摘要中的药品信息)的患者比例,并调查该PCB的提供与患者预后之间的关系:方法:在全州(澳大利亚昆士兰州)的临床信息系统中定义药物护理捆绑活动,并将数据集连接起来。在十个参与研究的地点,针对非同日住院的成年患者,使用常规记录数据开展了一项观察性研究。研究调查了多氯联苯交付程度与三种患者结果之间的关系:住院时间(LOS)、非计划再入院和死亡率:结果:共对 283 813 名患者的住院时间进行了评估。在 10 家参与医院中,有 26.9% 的患者接受了多氯联苯治疗,各医院的比例从 0.6% 到 61.2% 不等。住院时间较长的患者更有可能获得完整的多氯联苯(P):有 26.9% 的患者接受了完整的多氯联苯治疗,这与 30 天内非计划再入院率显著降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring the impact of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery on patient outcomes: an observational study.

Measuring the impact of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery on patient outcomes: an observational study.

Background: Clinical pharmacists perform activities to optimise medicines use and prevent patient harm. Historically, clinical pharmacy quality indicators have measured individual activities not linked to patient outcomes.

Aim: To determine the proportion of patients who receive a pharmaceutical care bundle (PCB) (consisting of a medication history, medication review, discharge medication list and medicines information on the discharge summary) as well as investigate the relationship between delivery of this PCB and patient outcomes.

Method: Pharmaceutical care bundle activities were defined within state-wide (Queensland, Australia) clinical information systems and datasets were linked. An observational study using routinely recorded data was performed at ten participating sites for adult patients who had a non-same day hospital stay. The association between extent of PCB delivery and three patient outcomes were investigated: length of stay (LOS), unplanned readmission, and mortality.

Results: In total 283,813 patient hospital stays were evaluated. The delivery of the PCB occurred in 26.9% of patients at the ten participating hospital sites, ranging from 0.6 to 61.2% across sites. Patients with a longer LOS were more likely to receive delivery of the complete PCB (P < 0.001). There was no correlation between PCB and hospital standardised mortality ratio (r = 0.03, p = 0.93). Higher rates of delivery of the PCB were associated with lower rates of unplanned readmission within 30 days (r = - 0.993, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A complete PCB was delivered to 26.9% of patients and was associated with a significantly lower rate of unplanned readmission within 30 days.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信