利用无人机激光雷达数据估算玉米和大豆的叶面积指数

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shezhou Luo, Weiwei Liu, Qian Ren, Hanquan Wei, Cheng Wang, Xiaohuan Xi, Sheng Nie, Dong Li, Dan Ma, Guoqing Zhou
{"title":"利用无人机激光雷达数据估算玉米和大豆的叶面积指数","authors":"Shezhou Luo, Weiwei Liu, Qian Ren, Hanquan Wei, Cheng Wang, Xiaohuan Xi, Sheng Nie, Dong Li, Dan Ma, Guoqing Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10146-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaf area index (LAI) is a vital input variable for crop growth and yield prediction models. Therefore, rapid and accurate crop LAI estimates can offer important information for monitoring and managing the quantity and quality of food production. Here, LAI values of maize and soybean were predicted applying height metrics and intensity metrics calculated through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data. Moreover, we compared the prediction performance of physical model with that of empirical model for estimating crop LAI. The physical model based on Beer–Lambert law yielded reliable estimation results using LiDAR height data (maize: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.815, RMSE = 0.385; soybean: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.627, RMSE = 0.515) and LiDAR intensity data (maize: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.719, RMSE = 0.474; soybean: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.548, RMSE = 0.567). However, the linear regression model obtained a higher estimation accuracy. The single linear regression model derived from LiDAR height data had an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.837 (RMSE = 0.361) for maize and 0.658 (RMSE = 0.493) for soybean, and derived from LiDAR intensity data had an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.749 (RMSE = 0.448) for maize and 0.460 (RMSE = 0.619) for soybean, respectively. We found that the random forest (RF) regression model yielded the lowest estimation accuracy in this study. Moreover, the RF regression model in our study was not able to reliably estimate soybean LAI whether using LiDAR height metrics (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.294) or intensity metrics (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.180). Our results show that both LiDAR intensity and height metrics are capable of reliably predicting maize and soybean LAIs, although LiDAR intensity data yielded lower estimation accuracy than LiDAR height data. In conclusion, the results presented in this study demonstrate that using UAV-LiDAR technology to predict crop LAI is a flexible, practical, and cost-effective method.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean using UAV LiDAR data\",\"authors\":\"Shezhou Luo, Weiwei Liu, Qian Ren, Hanquan Wei, Cheng Wang, Xiaohuan Xi, Sheng Nie, Dong Li, Dan Ma, Guoqing Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10146-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Leaf area index (LAI) is a vital input variable for crop growth and yield prediction models. Therefore, rapid and accurate crop LAI estimates can offer important information for monitoring and managing the quantity and quality of food production. Here, LAI values of maize and soybean were predicted applying height metrics and intensity metrics calculated through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data. Moreover, we compared the prediction performance of physical model with that of empirical model for estimating crop LAI. The physical model based on Beer–Lambert law yielded reliable estimation results using LiDAR height data (maize: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.815, RMSE = 0.385; soybean: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.627, RMSE = 0.515) and LiDAR intensity data (maize: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.719, RMSE = 0.474; soybean: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.548, RMSE = 0.567). However, the linear regression model obtained a higher estimation accuracy. The single linear regression model derived from LiDAR height data had an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.837 (RMSE = 0.361) for maize and 0.658 (RMSE = 0.493) for soybean, and derived from LiDAR intensity data had an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.749 (RMSE = 0.448) for maize and 0.460 (RMSE = 0.619) for soybean, respectively. We found that the random forest (RF) regression model yielded the lowest estimation accuracy in this study. Moreover, the RF regression model in our study was not able to reliably estimate soybean LAI whether using LiDAR height metrics (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.294) or intensity metrics (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.180). Our results show that both LiDAR intensity and height metrics are capable of reliably predicting maize and soybean LAIs, although LiDAR intensity data yielded lower estimation accuracy than LiDAR height data. In conclusion, the results presented in this study demonstrate that using UAV-LiDAR technology to predict crop LAI is a flexible, practical, and cost-effective method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10146-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10146-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶面积指数(LAI)是作物生长和产量预测模型的重要输入变量。因此,快速准确地估算作物的叶面积指数可为监测和管理粮食生产的数量和质量提供重要信息。在此,我们利用无人机(UAV)激光雷达数据计算出的高度指标和强度指标预测了玉米和大豆的 LAI 值。此外,我们还比较了物理模型和经验模型在估算作物 LAI 方面的预测性能。基于比尔-朗伯定律的物理模型使用激光雷达高度数据(玉米:R2 = 0.815,RMSE = 0.385;大豆:R2 = 0.627,RMSE = 0.515)和激光雷达强度数据(玉米:R2 = 0.719,RMSE = 0.474;大豆:R2 = 0.548,RMSE = 0.567)得出了可靠的估算结果。不过,线性回归模型的估计精度更高。由激光雷达高度数据推导出的单一线性回归模型,玉米的 R2 值为 0.837(RMSE = 0.361),大豆的 R2 值为 0.658(RMSE = 0.493);由激光雷达强度数据推导出的单一线性回归模型,玉米的 R2 值为 0.749(RMSE = 0.448),大豆的 R2 值为 0.460(RMSE = 0.619)。在本研究中,我们发现随机森林(RF)回归模型的估计精度最低。此外,在我们的研究中,无论是使用激光雷达高度指标(R2 = 0.294)还是强度指标(R2 = 0.180),RF 回归模型都无法可靠地估计大豆的 LAI。我们的结果表明,虽然激光雷达强度数据的估算精度低于激光雷达高度数据,但激光雷达强度和高度指标都能可靠地预测玉米和大豆的 LAI。总之,本研究的结果表明,使用无人机-激光雷达技术预测作物 LAI 是一种灵活、实用且经济有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean using UAV LiDAR data

Leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean using UAV LiDAR data

Leaf area index (LAI) is a vital input variable for crop growth and yield prediction models. Therefore, rapid and accurate crop LAI estimates can offer important information for monitoring and managing the quantity and quality of food production. Here, LAI values of maize and soybean were predicted applying height metrics and intensity metrics calculated through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data. Moreover, we compared the prediction performance of physical model with that of empirical model for estimating crop LAI. The physical model based on Beer–Lambert law yielded reliable estimation results using LiDAR height data (maize: R2 = 0.815, RMSE = 0.385; soybean: R2 = 0.627, RMSE = 0.515) and LiDAR intensity data (maize: R2 = 0.719, RMSE = 0.474; soybean: R2 = 0.548, RMSE = 0.567). However, the linear regression model obtained a higher estimation accuracy. The single linear regression model derived from LiDAR height data had an R2 value of 0.837 (RMSE = 0.361) for maize and 0.658 (RMSE = 0.493) for soybean, and derived from LiDAR intensity data had an R2 value of 0.749 (RMSE = 0.448) for maize and 0.460 (RMSE = 0.619) for soybean, respectively. We found that the random forest (RF) regression model yielded the lowest estimation accuracy in this study. Moreover, the RF regression model in our study was not able to reliably estimate soybean LAI whether using LiDAR height metrics (R2 = 0.294) or intensity metrics (R2 = 0.180). Our results show that both LiDAR intensity and height metrics are capable of reliably predicting maize and soybean LAIs, although LiDAR intensity data yielded lower estimation accuracy than LiDAR height data. In conclusion, the results presented in this study demonstrate that using UAV-LiDAR technology to predict crop LAI is a flexible, practical, and cost-effective method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信