解释土壤养分浓度时,恒定容重假设导致的不确定性

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arshdeep Singh, Meetpal S. Kukal
{"title":"解释土壤养分浓度时,恒定容重假设导致的不确定性","authors":"Arshdeep Singh,&nbsp;Meetpal S. Kukal","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil nutrient concentrations are often expressed as parts per million (ppm) in soil test reports. For incorporation into nutrient management decisions, ppm-based concentrations have to be converted into pounds per acre, and a conversion factor (multiplier) of 2.0 is typically recommended universally to do so. However, this conversion factor stems from an assumed value of bulk density (<i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub>) corresponding to silt loam soil and is invariant to any deviation beyond assumed <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub>. Here, we quantify and evaluate the potential ramifications of assuming a constant <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> value on calculating soil nitrogen credits. A true dynamic conversion factor that is sensitive to variation in <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> ranges between 1.28 and 2.68 for soils across US cropland. Failure to account for this dynamic conversion factor was shown to result in an underestimation of soil N credits by up to 40%. In addition to spatial variation, management-induced changes in <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> are also important to incorporate into the conversion factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty resulting from constant bulk density assumption when interpreting soil nutrient concentrations\",\"authors\":\"Arshdeep Singh,&nbsp;Meetpal S. Kukal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ael2.20129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil nutrient concentrations are often expressed as parts per million (ppm) in soil test reports. For incorporation into nutrient management decisions, ppm-based concentrations have to be converted into pounds per acre, and a conversion factor (multiplier) of 2.0 is typically recommended universally to do so. However, this conversion factor stems from an assumed value of bulk density (<i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub>) corresponding to silt loam soil and is invariant to any deviation beyond assumed <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub>. Here, we quantify and evaluate the potential ramifications of assuming a constant <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> value on calculating soil nitrogen credits. A true dynamic conversion factor that is sensitive to variation in <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> ranges between 1.28 and 2.68 for soils across US cropland. Failure to account for this dynamic conversion factor was shown to result in an underestimation of soil N credits by up to 40%. In addition to spatial variation, management-induced changes in <i>ρ</i><sub>b</sub> are also important to incorporate into the conversion factor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20129\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤测试报告中的土壤养分浓度通常以百万分之一(ppm)表示。为了将其纳入养分管理决策,必须将基于 ppm 的浓度换算成每英亩磅数,通常普遍建议将换算系数(乘数)定为 2.0。不过,该转换系数是根据与淤泥质土壤相对应的容重假定值 (ρb)计算得出的,超出假定 ρb 的任何偏差都不会改变。在此,我们量化并评估了假设 ρb 值恒定对计算土壤氮抵消量的潜在影响。美国耕地土壤中,对 ρb 变化敏感的真实动态转换因子介于 1.28 和 2.68 之间。结果表明,如果不考虑这一动态转换系数,土壤氮素贷方会被低估达 40%。除了空间变化外,管理引起的 ρb 变化也很重要,需要纳入转换因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncertainty resulting from constant bulk density assumption when interpreting soil nutrient concentrations

Uncertainty resulting from constant bulk density assumption when interpreting soil nutrient concentrations

Soil nutrient concentrations are often expressed as parts per million (ppm) in soil test reports. For incorporation into nutrient management decisions, ppm-based concentrations have to be converted into pounds per acre, and a conversion factor (multiplier) of 2.0 is typically recommended universally to do so. However, this conversion factor stems from an assumed value of bulk density (ρb) corresponding to silt loam soil and is invariant to any deviation beyond assumed ρb. Here, we quantify and evaluate the potential ramifications of assuming a constant ρb value on calculating soil nitrogen credits. A true dynamic conversion factor that is sensitive to variation in ρb ranges between 1.28 and 2.68 for soils across US cropland. Failure to account for this dynamic conversion factor was shown to result in an underestimation of soil N credits by up to 40%. In addition to spatial variation, management-induced changes in ρb are also important to incorporate into the conversion factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信