使用深冻和液氮保存方法对骨异体移植特性的影响:体外研究

Narra J Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.52225/narra.v4i1.757
Rizal A Lisan, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Mouli Edward, Dewan S Buwana
{"title":"使用深冻和液氮保存方法对骨异体移植特性的影响:体外研究","authors":"Rizal A Lisan, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Mouli Edward, Dewan S Buwana","doi":"10.52225/narra.v4i1.757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone grafting has emerged as a key solution in bone defect management such as allograft, graft of bone from another individual. However, bone allografts usually undergo rigorous preparation to eliminate immune-triggering elements. The deep-freezing methods may delay graft use, while cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen allows rapid freezing but may alter graft characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-preservation changes in bone allograft characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen methods using animal model. An experimental study using a post-test only control group design was conducted. Fresh-frozen femoral cortical bone was obtained from male New Zealand white rabbits. Preservation by deep-freezing involved placing bone samples in a -80°C freezer for 30 days. For liquid nitrogen preservation, bone grafts were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a 15-min rest at room temperature and a final immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 30°C for 15 min. Bone samples then underwent evaluation of cell viability, compression, and bending tests. Cell viability test employed the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the compression and bending tests used the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Independent Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the methods as appropriate. Our study found that the use of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen resulted in similar outcomes for cell viability, compression, and bending tests, with <i>p</i>-values of 0.302, 0.745, and 0.512, respectively. Further exploration with larger sample sizes may help to optimize the methods for specific applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":517416,"journal":{"name":"Narra J","volume":"4 1","pages":"e757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11125383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of preservation methods using deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen in bone allograft characteristics: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Rizal A Lisan, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Mouli Edward, Dewan S Buwana\",\"doi\":\"10.52225/narra.v4i1.757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone grafting has emerged as a key solution in bone defect management such as allograft, graft of bone from another individual. However, bone allografts usually undergo rigorous preparation to eliminate immune-triggering elements. The deep-freezing methods may delay graft use, while cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen allows rapid freezing but may alter graft characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-preservation changes in bone allograft characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen methods using animal model. An experimental study using a post-test only control group design was conducted. Fresh-frozen femoral cortical bone was obtained from male New Zealand white rabbits. Preservation by deep-freezing involved placing bone samples in a -80°C freezer for 30 days. For liquid nitrogen preservation, bone grafts were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a 15-min rest at room temperature and a final immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 30°C for 15 min. Bone samples then underwent evaluation of cell viability, compression, and bending tests. Cell viability test employed the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the compression and bending tests used the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Independent Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the methods as appropriate. Our study found that the use of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen resulted in similar outcomes for cell viability, compression, and bending tests, with <i>p</i>-values of 0.302, 0.745, and 0.512, respectively. Further exploration with larger sample sizes may help to optimize the methods for specific applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narra J\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11125383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narra J\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i1.757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narra J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i1.757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨移植已成为骨缺损治疗的一个重要解决方案,例如异体骨移植,即从他人身上移植骨。然而,骨异体移植通常要经过严格的准备过程,以消除引发免疫的因素。深度冷冻方法可能会延迟移植物的使用,而使用液氮进行低温保存可以快速冷冻,但可能会改变移植物的特性。本研究旨在利用动物模型研究骨异体移植物保存后的特性变化,并比较深冻法和液氮法的有效性。本研究采用实验组设计,仅进行后期测试。新鲜冷冻的股骨皮质骨取自雄性新西兰白兔。深冷保存法是将骨样本放入零下 80°C 的冷冻箱中冷冻 30 天。液氮保存时,将骨移植物在液氮中浸泡 20 分钟,然后在室温下静置 15 分钟,最后在 30°C 的 0.9% 氯化钠中浸泡 15 分钟。然后对骨样本进行细胞活力评估、压缩和弯曲测试。细胞活力测试采用 3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基-2H-溴化四氮唑(MTT)测定法,压缩和弯曲测试采用万能试验机(UTM)。根据情况使用独立学生 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验对各种方法进行比较。我们的研究发现,使用深冻和液氮进行细胞活力、压缩和弯曲测试的结果相似,P 值分别为 0.302、0.745 和 0.512。利用更大的样本量进行进一步探索,可能有助于针对特定应用优化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of preservation methods using deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen in bone allograft characteristics: An in vitro study.

Bone grafting has emerged as a key solution in bone defect management such as allograft, graft of bone from another individual. However, bone allografts usually undergo rigorous preparation to eliminate immune-triggering elements. The deep-freezing methods may delay graft use, while cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen allows rapid freezing but may alter graft characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-preservation changes in bone allograft characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen methods using animal model. An experimental study using a post-test only control group design was conducted. Fresh-frozen femoral cortical bone was obtained from male New Zealand white rabbits. Preservation by deep-freezing involved placing bone samples in a -80°C freezer for 30 days. For liquid nitrogen preservation, bone grafts were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a 15-min rest at room temperature and a final immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 30°C for 15 min. Bone samples then underwent evaluation of cell viability, compression, and bending tests. Cell viability test employed the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the compression and bending tests used the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Independent Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the methods as appropriate. Our study found that the use of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen resulted in similar outcomes for cell viability, compression, and bending tests, with p-values of 0.302, 0.745, and 0.512, respectively. Further exploration with larger sample sizes may help to optimize the methods for specific applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信