计算机断层扫描中偶然出现的胸膜顶端瘢痕:诊断率、进展、形态特征和临床意义。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Danielle Toussie, Mark Finkelstein, Dexter Mendoza, Jose Concepcion, Jadranka Stojanovska, Lea Azour, Jane P Ko, William H Moore, Ayushi Singh, Arielle Sasson, Priya Bhattacharji, Corey Eber
{"title":"计算机断层扫描中偶然出现的胸膜顶端瘢痕:诊断率、进展、形态特征和临床意义。","authors":"Danielle Toussie, Mark Finkelstein, Dexter Mendoza, Jose Concepcion, Jadranka Stojanovska, Lea Azour, Jane P Ko, William H Moore, Ayushi Singh, Arielle Sasson, Priya Bhattacharji, Corey Eber","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Apical pleuroparenchymal scarring (APPS) is commonly seen on chest computed tomography (CT), though the imaging and clinical features, to the best of our knowledge, have never been studied. The purpose was to understand APPS's typical morphologic appearance and associated clinical features.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A random generator selected 1000 adult patients from all 21516 chest CTs performed at urban outpatient centers from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Patients with obscuring apical diseases were excluded to eliminate confounding factors. After exclusions, 780 patients (median age: 64 y; interquartile range: 56 to 72 y; 55% males) were included for analysis. Two radiologists evaluated the lung apices of each CT for the extent of abnormality in the axial plane (mild: <5 mm, moderate: 5 to 10 mm, severe: >10 mm), craniocaudal plane (extension halfway to the aortic arch, more than halfway, vs below the arch), the predominant pattern (nodular vs reticular and symmetry), and progression. Cohen kappa coefficient was used to assess radiologists' agreement in scoring. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine associations of clinical and imaging variables with APPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APPS was present on 65% (507/780) of chest CTs (54% mild axial; 80% mild craniocaudal). The predominant pattern was nodular and symmetric. Greater age, female sex, lower body mass index, greater height, and white race were associated with more extensive APPS. APPS was not found to be associated with lung cancer in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Classifying APPS by the extent of disease in the axial or craniocaudal planes, in addition to the predominant pattern, enabled statistically significant associations to be determined, which may aid in understanding the pathophysiology of apical scarring and potential associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Toussie, Mark Finkelstein, Dexter Mendoza, Jose Concepcion, Jadranka Stojanovska, Lea Azour, Jane P Ko, William H Moore, Ayushi Singh, Arielle Sasson, Priya Bhattacharji, Corey Eber\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Apical pleuroparenchymal scarring (APPS) is commonly seen on chest computed tomography (CT), though the imaging and clinical features, to the best of our knowledge, have never been studied. The purpose was to understand APPS's typical morphologic appearance and associated clinical features.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A random generator selected 1000 adult patients from all 21516 chest CTs performed at urban outpatient centers from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Patients with obscuring apical diseases were excluded to eliminate confounding factors. After exclusions, 780 patients (median age: 64 y; interquartile range: 56 to 72 y; 55% males) were included for analysis. Two radiologists evaluated the lung apices of each CT for the extent of abnormality in the axial plane (mild: <5 mm, moderate: 5 to 10 mm, severe: >10 mm), craniocaudal plane (extension halfway to the aortic arch, more than halfway, vs below the arch), the predominant pattern (nodular vs reticular and symmetry), and progression. Cohen kappa coefficient was used to assess radiologists' agreement in scoring. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine associations of clinical and imaging variables with APPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APPS was present on 65% (507/780) of chest CTs (54% mild axial; 80% mild craniocaudal). The predominant pattern was nodular and symmetric. Greater age, female sex, lower body mass index, greater height, and white race were associated with more extensive APPS. APPS was not found to be associated with lung cancer in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Classifying APPS by the extent of disease in the axial or craniocaudal planes, in addition to the predominant pattern, enabled statistically significant associations to be determined, which may aid in understanding the pathophysiology of apical scarring and potential associated risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000794\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胸膜尖瘢痕(APPS)常见于胸部计算机断层扫描(CT),但据我们所知,其影像学和临床特征从未被研究过。我们的目的是了解 APPS 的典型形态外观和相关临床特征:随机生成器从 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在城市门诊中心进行的所有 21516 次胸部 CT 中选取了 1000 名成年患者。为排除混杂因素,排除了患有遮盖性心尖疾病的患者。排除后,共有 780 名患者(中位年龄:64 岁;四分位数间距:56 至 72 岁;55% 为男性)纳入分析。两名放射科医生对每张 CT 的肺尖进行了评估,以确定轴向平面(轻度:10 毫米)、颅尾平面(延伸至主动脉弓的一半、超过一半与低于主动脉弓)、主要形态(结节状与网状以及对称性)和进展的异常程度。科恩卡帕系数(Cohen kappa coefficient)用于评估放射医师的评分一致性。采用顺序逻辑回归法确定临床和影像学变量与 APPS 的关联:65%(507/780)的胸部 CT 显示 APPS(54% 轻度轴位;80% 轻度颅尾位)。主要表现为结节状和对称性。年龄越大、性别为女性、体重指数越低、身高越高和白种人与更广泛的 APPS 相关。在该队列中,未发现APPS与肺癌有关:结论:除了主要模式外,根据疾病在轴向或头尾平面的范围对APPS进行分类,可确定具有统计学意义的相关性,这可能有助于了解根尖瘢痕的病理生理学和潜在的相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance.

Purpose: Apical pleuroparenchymal scarring (APPS) is commonly seen on chest computed tomography (CT), though the imaging and clinical features, to the best of our knowledge, have never been studied. The purpose was to understand APPS's typical morphologic appearance and associated clinical features.

Patients and methods: A random generator selected 1000 adult patients from all 21516 chest CTs performed at urban outpatient centers from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Patients with obscuring apical diseases were excluded to eliminate confounding factors. After exclusions, 780 patients (median age: 64 y; interquartile range: 56 to 72 y; 55% males) were included for analysis. Two radiologists evaluated the lung apices of each CT for the extent of abnormality in the axial plane (mild: <5 mm, moderate: 5 to 10 mm, severe: >10 mm), craniocaudal plane (extension halfway to the aortic arch, more than halfway, vs below the arch), the predominant pattern (nodular vs reticular and symmetry), and progression. Cohen kappa coefficient was used to assess radiologists' agreement in scoring. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine associations of clinical and imaging variables with APPS.

Results: APPS was present on 65% (507/780) of chest CTs (54% mild axial; 80% mild craniocaudal). The predominant pattern was nodular and symmetric. Greater age, female sex, lower body mass index, greater height, and white race were associated with more extensive APPS. APPS was not found to be associated with lung cancer in this cohort.

Conclusion: Classifying APPS by the extent of disease in the axial or craniocaudal planes, in addition to the predominant pattern, enabled statistically significant associations to be determined, which may aid in understanding the pathophysiology of apical scarring and potential associated risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信