[Comparison of the effectiveness of various methods for determining the level of metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytomas].

Background: Pheochromocytoma (PHEO) is a tumor from the chromaffin tissue of the adrenal medulla, capable of hyperproduction of catecholamines. The increased production of hormones by the tumor leads to catecholamine crises, which have a pathological effect on all organs and systems. In the primary diagnosis of pheochromocytomas, it is important to determine the level of the metabolite of catecholamines - metanephrines. Currently, in clinical practice, various methods are used to determine the level of this metabolite: in blood plasma or in urine, total or only free form, fractionated analysis or unfractionated.

Aim: Comparison of the effectiveness of various methods for determining the level of metanephrines for the diagnosis of pheochromocytomas.

Materials and methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on a sample of patients who were initially operated on for adrenal neoplasm at the Pirogov St. Petersburg State University High Medical Technology Clinic from November 2007 to December 2022 and who passed analysis to determine the level of blood or urine metanephrins before surgical treatment. The results of tests for metanephrine and tumor size were evaluated.

Results: 1088 patients with adrenal neoplasms who underwent surgical treatment were examined, of which 348 had histologically confirmed the presence of pheochromocytoma. Four types of metanephrine assays were compared: free fractionated plasma metanephrines (232 patients), unfractionated daily urine metanephrines (431 patients), fractionated total daily urine metanephrines (427 patients) and fractionated free daily urine metanephrines (178 patients). The greatest sensitivity was demonstrated by the analysis of free fractionated plasma methanephrines (95.4%). Unlike others, the sensitivity of this analysis did not decrease in the group of patients with small pheochromocytomas (3 cm or less). The greatest specificity was demonstrated by the analysis of unfractionated metanephrines in daily urine (97.8%), with the lowest sensitivity among all tests (67.6%). The study of fractionated total daily urine metanephrins showed good results of sensitivity and specificity, only slightly inferior to the best indicators, and the analysis of free daily urine metanephrins demonstrated unexpectedly low efficiency. There is a positive correlation between the level of metanephrine in the blood and the size of the tumor.

Conclusion: Based on the data obtained, the preferred assays for the primary diagnosis of pheochromocytoma can be considered the determination of fractionated free plasma metanephrines and fractionated total daily urine metanephrines, which is consistent with relevant clinical recommendations. It was found that the size of the tumor correlates with the severity of an increase in the level of metanephrins determined by any of the described methods.