自体血小板浓缩物在即刻种植治疗中的疗效:前瞻性对照临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Hamoun Sabri, Neshatafarin Manouchehri, Obada Mandil, Abdusalam Alrmali, Sara AlHachache, Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"自体血小板浓缩物在即刻种植治疗中的疗效:前瞻性对照临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hamoun Sabri, Neshatafarin Manouchehri, Obada Mandil, Abdusalam Alrmali, Sara AlHachache, Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an overview of the outcomes of the use of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on an a priori protocol, a systematic search was performed of the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed), Embase and Scopus databases. Randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials on immediate implant placement including at least one study arm with use of platelet-rich fibrin or platelet-rich plasma as a gap filler between immediately placed implants and the alveolar bone were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was built to assess the primary outcomes of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depths between test (platelet concentrates) and control (no graft or other graft materials) groups. A risk of bias assessment was performed and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 trials (595 immediate implants placed in 454 individuals) were included in the meta-analytic model. Based on the data from studies with a minimum post-prosthetic loading period of 6 months after immediate implant placement, overall, the application of platelet concentrates was associated with significantly lower marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth compared to the control groups (mean difference -0.36 mm; P < 0.01 and mean difference -0.47 mm; P < 0.01, respectively). No additional benefit of application of platelet concentrates was detected regarding primary stability of immediate implants. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower marginal bone loss with xenogeneic bone alone compared to platelet concentrates alone as grafting material in immediate implant placement (mean difference 0.66 mm; P < 0.01). Evidence on soft tissue outcomes and aesthetic parameters was scarce.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low level of certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach indicates superior outcomes in terms of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth in immediate implant placement with the use of platelet concentrates versus no graft. Future research should be tailored towards a standardised protocol for preparation of platelet concentrates and inclusion of soft tissue and aesthetic outcomes as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective controlled clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hamoun Sabri, Neshatafarin Manouchehri, Obada Mandil, Abdusalam Alrmali, Sara AlHachache, Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Hom-Lay Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an overview of the outcomes of the use of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on an a priori protocol, a systematic search was performed of the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed), Embase and Scopus databases. Randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials on immediate implant placement including at least one study arm with use of platelet-rich fibrin or platelet-rich plasma as a gap filler between immediately placed implants and the alveolar bone were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was built to assess the primary outcomes of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depths between test (platelet concentrates) and control (no graft or other graft materials) groups. A risk of bias assessment was performed and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 trials (595 immediate implants placed in 454 individuals) were included in the meta-analytic model. Based on the data from studies with a minimum post-prosthetic loading period of 6 months after immediate implant placement, overall, the application of platelet concentrates was associated with significantly lower marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth compared to the control groups (mean difference -0.36 mm; P < 0.01 and mean difference -0.47 mm; P < 0.01, respectively). No additional benefit of application of platelet concentrates was detected regarding primary stability of immediate implants. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower marginal bone loss with xenogeneic bone alone compared to platelet concentrates alone as grafting material in immediate implant placement (mean difference 0.66 mm; P < 0.01). Evidence on soft tissue outcomes and aesthetic parameters was scarce.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low level of certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach indicates superior outcomes in terms of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth in immediate implant placement with the use of platelet concentrates versus no graft. Future research should be tailored towards a standardised protocol for preparation of platelet concentrates and inclusion of soft tissue and aesthetic outcomes as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概述在即刻种植体植入中使用自体血小板浓缩物的结果:根据事先制定的方案,对美国国家医学图书馆(MEDLINE via PubMed)、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统检索。纳入了有关即刻种植体植入的随机和非随机对照临床试验,其中至少包括一项使用富血小板纤维蛋白或富血小板血浆作为即刻植入种植体与牙槽骨之间间隙填充物的研究。建立了随机效应荟萃分析模型,以评估试验组(血小板浓缩物)和对照组(无移植材料或其他移植材料)之间的边缘骨质流失和探查袋深度的主要结果。对偏倚风险进行了评估,并采用建议分级评估、发展和评价方法对证据的确定性进行了评估:荟萃分析模型共纳入了 20 项试验(为 454 人植入了 595 个即刻种植体)。根据即刻种植体植入后至少 6 个月的修复后装载期的研究数据,总体而言,与对照组相比,应用血小板浓缩物可显著降低边缘骨质流失和探查袋深度(平均差异-0.36 毫米;P < 0.01;平均差异-0.47 毫米;P < 0.01)。在即刻种植体的主要稳定性方面,没有发现应用血小板浓缩物的额外益处。亚组分析显示,在即刻种植体植入过程中,仅使用异种骨作为移植材料的边缘骨损失明显低于仅使用血小板浓缩物作为移植材料的边缘骨损失(平均差异为 0.66 毫米;P < 0.01)。有关软组织效果和美学参数的证据很少:基于建议分级评估、发展和评价方法的低确定性表明,在即刻种植体植入中使用血小板浓缩物与不使用移植材料相比,在边缘骨缺失和探查袋深度方面效果更佳。未来的研究应针对制备血小板浓缩物的标准化方案,并纳入软组织和美学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective controlled clinical trials.

Purpose: To provide an overview of the outcomes of the use of autogenous platelet concentrates in immediate implant placement.

Materials and methods: Based on an a priori protocol, a systematic search was performed of the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via PubMed), Embase and Scopus databases. Randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials on immediate implant placement including at least one study arm with use of platelet-rich fibrin or platelet-rich plasma as a gap filler between immediately placed implants and the alveolar bone were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was built to assess the primary outcomes of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depths between test (platelet concentrates) and control (no graft or other graft materials) groups. A risk of bias assessment was performed and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

Results: A total of 20 trials (595 immediate implants placed in 454 individuals) were included in the meta-analytic model. Based on the data from studies with a minimum post-prosthetic loading period of 6 months after immediate implant placement, overall, the application of platelet concentrates was associated with significantly lower marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth compared to the control groups (mean difference -0.36 mm; P < 0.01 and mean difference -0.47 mm; P < 0.01, respectively). No additional benefit of application of platelet concentrates was detected regarding primary stability of immediate implants. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower marginal bone loss with xenogeneic bone alone compared to platelet concentrates alone as grafting material in immediate implant placement (mean difference 0.66 mm; P < 0.01). Evidence on soft tissue outcomes and aesthetic parameters was scarce.

Conclusions: A low level of certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach indicates superior outcomes in terms of marginal bone loss and probing pocket depth in immediate implant placement with the use of platelet concentrates versus no graft. Future research should be tailored towards a standardised protocol for preparation of platelet concentrates and inclusion of soft tissue and aesthetic outcomes as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信