Runlin Yang, Yifan Ren, Hong Kuan Kok, Paul D Smith, Parham Mohsenzadeh Kebria, Abbas Khosravi, Julian Maingard, Melissa Yeo, Jonathan Hall, Michelle Foo, Kevin Zhou, Ashu Jhamb, Jeremy Russell, Mark Brooks, Hamed Asadi
{"title":"验证用于预测颅内动脉瘤破裂状态的简化动脉瘤无量纲流动参数。","authors":"Runlin Yang, Yifan Ren, Hong Kuan Kok, Paul D Smith, Parham Mohsenzadeh Kebria, Abbas Khosravi, Julian Maingard, Melissa Yeo, Jonathan Hall, Michelle Foo, Kevin Zhou, Ashu Jhamb, Jeremy Russell, Mark Brooks, Hamed Asadi","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aneurysm number (An) is a novel prediction tool utilizing parameters of pulsatility index (PI) and aneurysm geometry. An has been shown to have the potential to differentiate intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of An for IA rupture status prediction using Australian based clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted across three tertiary referral hospitals between November 2017 and November 2020 and all saccular IAs with known rupture status were included. Two sets of An values were calculated based on two sets of PI values previously reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and four IA cases were included in this study. The results demonstrated no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured status when using An ≥1 as the discriminator. Further analysis showed no strong correlation between An and IA subtypes. The area under the curve (AUC) indicated poor performance in predicting rupture status (AUC1 = 0.55 and AUC2 = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study does not support An ≥1 as a reliable parameter to predict the rupture status of IAs based on a retrospective cohort. Although the concept of An is supported by hemodynamic aneurysm theory, further research is needed before it can be applied in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study demonstrates that the novel prediction tool, An, proposed in 2020 is not reliable and that further research of this hemodynamic model is needed before it can be incorporated into the prediction of IA rupture status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1357-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of a simplified aneurysm dimensionless flow parameter to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture status.\",\"authors\":\"Runlin Yang, Yifan Ren, Hong Kuan Kok, Paul D Smith, Parham Mohsenzadeh Kebria, Abbas Khosravi, Julian Maingard, Melissa Yeo, Jonathan Hall, Michelle Foo, Kevin Zhou, Ashu Jhamb, Jeremy Russell, Mark Brooks, Hamed Asadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqae106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aneurysm number (An) is a novel prediction tool utilizing parameters of pulsatility index (PI) and aneurysm geometry. An has been shown to have the potential to differentiate intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of An for IA rupture status prediction using Australian based clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted across three tertiary referral hospitals between November 2017 and November 2020 and all saccular IAs with known rupture status were included. Two sets of An values were calculated based on two sets of PI values previously reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and four IA cases were included in this study. The results demonstrated no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured status when using An ≥1 as the discriminator. Further analysis showed no strong correlation between An and IA subtypes. The area under the curve (AUC) indicated poor performance in predicting rupture status (AUC1 = 0.55 and AUC2 = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study does not support An ≥1 as a reliable parameter to predict the rupture status of IAs based on a retrospective cohort. Although the concept of An is supported by hemodynamic aneurysm theory, further research is needed before it can be applied in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study demonstrates that the novel prediction tool, An, proposed in 2020 is not reliable and that further research of this hemodynamic model is needed before it can be incorporated into the prediction of IA rupture status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1357-1364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:动脉瘤数目(An)是一种利用搏动指数(PI)和动脉瘤几何参数的新型预测工具。An 已被证明具有区分颅内动脉瘤(IA)破裂状态的潜力。本研究的目的是利用澳大利亚的临床数据,调查 An 用于预测颅内动脉瘤破裂状态的可行性和准确性:2017年11月至2020年11月期间,在三家三级转诊医院开展了一项回顾性研究,纳入了所有已知破裂状态的囊状IA。根据之前文献报道的两组 PI 值计算出两组 An 值:本研究共纳入五百零四例IA。结果显示,以 An ≥ 1 作为判别指标时,破裂和未破裂状态之间没有明显差异。进一步的分析表明,An 和 IA 亚型之间没有很强的相关性。曲线下面积(AUC)显示,预测破裂状态的性能较差(AUC1=0.55,AUC2=0.56):本研究基于回顾性队列,不支持将An≥1作为预测IAs破裂状态的可靠参数。尽管An的概念得到了血流动力学动脉瘤理论的支持,但在应用于临床之前还需要进一步的研究:本研究表明,2020 年提出的新型预测工具 An 并不可靠,在将该血液动力学模型纳入颅内动脉瘤破裂状态预测之前,还需要对其进行进一步研究。
Verification of a simplified aneurysm dimensionless flow parameter to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture status.
Objectives: Aneurysm number (An) is a novel prediction tool utilizing parameters of pulsatility index (PI) and aneurysm geometry. An has been shown to have the potential to differentiate intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of An for IA rupture status prediction using Australian based clinical data.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted across three tertiary referral hospitals between November 2017 and November 2020 and all saccular IAs with known rupture status were included. Two sets of An values were calculated based on two sets of PI values previously reported in the literature.
Results: Five hundred and four IA cases were included in this study. The results demonstrated no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured status when using An ≥1 as the discriminator. Further analysis showed no strong correlation between An and IA subtypes. The area under the curve (AUC) indicated poor performance in predicting rupture status (AUC1 = 0.55 and AUC2 = 0.56).
Conclusions: This study does not support An ≥1 as a reliable parameter to predict the rupture status of IAs based on a retrospective cohort. Although the concept of An is supported by hemodynamic aneurysm theory, further research is needed before it can be applied in the clinical setting.
Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates that the novel prediction tool, An, proposed in 2020 is not reliable and that further research of this hemodynamic model is needed before it can be incorporated into the prediction of IA rupture status.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option