古柯碱相关口腔黏膜下纤维化患者唾液、血清和尿液中 8-OHdG 的比较评估。

Q3 Medicine
Rajesh K Prajapati, Jaya Joshi, S Karthikeyan, Muzalda P S Inder
{"title":"古柯碱相关口腔黏膜下纤维化患者唾液、血清和尿液中 8-OHdG 的比较评估。","authors":"Rajesh K Prajapati, Jaya Joshi, S Karthikeyan, Muzalda P S Inder","doi":"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_442_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gutka chewing is the most common deleterious oral habit prevalent in the geographical distribution of the Indian subcontinent. Gutka leads to the production of numerous free radicals, which causes oxidative stress in regional oral tissues. Oxidative stress brings about the oxidation of guanine bases of DNA that generates 8-OHdG as its main byproduct. The presence of 8-OHdG can be evaluated not only in tissue but also in saliva, blood and urine. The availability of 8-OHdG in these samples is quite documented. In addition, a comparative assay of 8-ohdg DNA damage marker in multiple samples is yet to be done.</p><p><strong>Material and methodology: </strong>A sample size of 60 was divided into two groups, i.e., gutka consumers without any lesion and gutka consumers with OSMF. Ten samples each of saliva, serum and urine were collected from these two groups and healthy controls. Samples were centrifuged at 1000 RPM at 2-8°C for 15-20 minutes. A volume of 1.5 ml resultant supernatant was pipetted out in labelled Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80°C. The ELISA test was performed to measure the concentration of 8-OHdG protein in different samples at 450 nm after adding stop solution in 96-well microplate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8-OHdG concentration was found to be highest in saliva followed by urine and serum. 8-OHdG concentration in serum was significantly less than that in saliva and urine (<i>P</i>-value <0.05). Intergroup difference in concentration of 8-OHdG of urine, saliva and serum was significant (<i>P</i>-value <0.05). <i>Post</i> <i>hoc</i> analysis revealed that concentration of 8-OHdG in saliva and urine was non-significantly different (<i>P</i>-value >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saliva appears to be the most appropriate sample type as compared to serum and urine for the evaluation of 8-OHdG in OSMF subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":38846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","volume":"28 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11126255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of salivary, serum and urinary 8-OHdG in gutka-associated oral submucous fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Rajesh K Prajapati, Jaya Joshi, S Karthikeyan, Muzalda P S Inder\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_442_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gutka chewing is the most common deleterious oral habit prevalent in the geographical distribution of the Indian subcontinent. Gutka leads to the production of numerous free radicals, which causes oxidative stress in regional oral tissues. Oxidative stress brings about the oxidation of guanine bases of DNA that generates 8-OHdG as its main byproduct. The presence of 8-OHdG can be evaluated not only in tissue but also in saliva, blood and urine. The availability of 8-OHdG in these samples is quite documented. In addition, a comparative assay of 8-ohdg DNA damage marker in multiple samples is yet to be done.</p><p><strong>Material and methodology: </strong>A sample size of 60 was divided into two groups, i.e., gutka consumers without any lesion and gutka consumers with OSMF. Ten samples each of saliva, serum and urine were collected from these two groups and healthy controls. Samples were centrifuged at 1000 RPM at 2-8°C for 15-20 minutes. A volume of 1.5 ml resultant supernatant was pipetted out in labelled Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80°C. The ELISA test was performed to measure the concentration of 8-OHdG protein in different samples at 450 nm after adding stop solution in 96-well microplate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8-OHdG concentration was found to be highest in saliva followed by urine and serum. 8-OHdG concentration in serum was significantly less than that in saliva and urine (<i>P</i>-value <0.05). Intergroup difference in concentration of 8-OHdG of urine, saliva and serum was significant (<i>P</i>-value <0.05). <i>Post</i> <i>hoc</i> analysis revealed that concentration of 8-OHdG in saliva and urine was non-significantly different (<i>P</i>-value >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saliva appears to be the most appropriate sample type as compared to serum and urine for the evaluation of 8-OHdG in OSMF subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"37-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11126255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_442_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_442_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度次大陆的地理分布中,咀嚼 Gutka 是最常见的有害口腔习惯。咀嚼 Gutka 会产生大量自由基,导致区域性口腔组织出现氧化应激。氧化应激导致 DNA 鸟嘌呤碱基氧化,生成 8-OHdG 作为其主要副产品。8-OHdG 不仅可以在组织中检测到,还可以在唾液、血液和尿液中检测到。8-OHdG 在这些样本中的可获得性已有大量文献记载。此外,8-OHdG DNA 损伤标记物在多种样本中的比较分析尚待完成:将 60 份样本分为两组,即无任何病变的古卡消费者和有 OSMF 的古卡消费者。从这两组人和健康对照组中各采集 10 份唾液、血清和尿液样本。样品在 2-8°C、1000 转/分的转速下离心 15-20 分钟。在贴有标签的 Eppendorf 管中吸出 1.5 毫升上清液,保存在 -80°C 温度下。在 96 孔微孔板中加入终止液后,进行 ELISA 试验,在 450 纳米波长下测量不同样品中 8-OHdG 蛋白的浓度:结果:唾液中的 8-OHdG 浓度最高,其次是尿液和血清。结果:唾液中 8-OHdG 的浓度最高,其次是尿液和血清,血清中 8-OHdG 的浓度明显低于唾液和尿液(P-value P-value Post hoc 分析显示唾液和尿液中 8-OHdG 的浓度差异不显著(P-value >0.05):与血清和尿液相比,唾液似乎是评估 OSMF 受试者 8-OHdG 的最合适样本类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of salivary, serum and urinary 8-OHdG in gutka-associated oral submucous fibrosis.

Background: Gutka chewing is the most common deleterious oral habit prevalent in the geographical distribution of the Indian subcontinent. Gutka leads to the production of numerous free radicals, which causes oxidative stress in regional oral tissues. Oxidative stress brings about the oxidation of guanine bases of DNA that generates 8-OHdG as its main byproduct. The presence of 8-OHdG can be evaluated not only in tissue but also in saliva, blood and urine. The availability of 8-OHdG in these samples is quite documented. In addition, a comparative assay of 8-ohdg DNA damage marker in multiple samples is yet to be done.

Material and methodology: A sample size of 60 was divided into two groups, i.e., gutka consumers without any lesion and gutka consumers with OSMF. Ten samples each of saliva, serum and urine were collected from these two groups and healthy controls. Samples were centrifuged at 1000 RPM at 2-8°C for 15-20 minutes. A volume of 1.5 ml resultant supernatant was pipetted out in labelled Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80°C. The ELISA test was performed to measure the concentration of 8-OHdG protein in different samples at 450 nm after adding stop solution in 96-well microplate.

Results: 8-OHdG concentration was found to be highest in saliva followed by urine and serum. 8-OHdG concentration in serum was significantly less than that in saliva and urine (P-value <0.05). Intergroup difference in concentration of 8-OHdG of urine, saliva and serum was significant (P-value <0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed that concentration of 8-OHdG in saliva and urine was non-significantly different (P-value >0.05).

Conclusion: Saliva appears to be the most appropriate sample type as compared to serum and urine for the evaluation of 8-OHdG in OSMF subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology [ISSN:print-(0973-029X, online-1998-393X)] is a tri-annual journal published on behalf of “The Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists” (IAOMP). The publication of JOMFP was started in the year 1993. The journal publishes papers on a wide spectrum of topics associated with the scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, also, ensuring scientific merit and quality. It is a comprehensive reading material for the professionals who want to upgrade their diagnostic skills in Oral Diseases; allows exposure to newer topics and methods of research in the Oral-facial Tissues and Pathology. New features allow an open minded thinking and approach to various pathologies. It also encourages authors to showcase quality work done by them and to compile relevant cases which are diagnostically challenging. The Journal takes pride in maintaining the quality of articles and photomicrographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信