柳叶刀的两百年:从庸医到反疫苗,或柳叶刀如何表明立场

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marysa Demoor
{"title":"柳叶刀的两百年:从庸医到反疫苗,或柳叶刀如何表明立场","authors":"Marysa Demoor","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay traces the rise of the <i>Lancet</i> from its humble nineteenth-century beginnings to its current status as one of the most prestigious medical journals. By examining the <i>Lancet</i>'s early years and the hopes of founding editor Thomas Wakely and his successors, I aim to reveal what distinguished this journal from others circulating at the time and guaranteed its longevity. Despite fierce competition with several early medical journals, including the <i>British Medical Journal</i> and a quack publication that called itself the <i>Anti</i>-<i>Lancet</i>, the <i>Lancet</i> continued to publish research-based information to instruct the medical community far and wide. Indeed, while fake news and anti-vaxers might seem like twenty-first-century problems, this paper shows how the <i>Lancet</i> has been addressing misinformation for two hundred years.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Hundred Years of the Lancet: From Quack to Anti-Vax, or How the Lancet Took a Stand\",\"authors\":\"Marysa Demoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay traces the rise of the <i>Lancet</i> from its humble nineteenth-century beginnings to its current status as one of the most prestigious medical journals. By examining the <i>Lancet</i>'s early years and the hopes of founding editor Thomas Wakely and his successors, I aim to reveal what distinguished this journal from others circulating at the time and guaranteed its longevity. Despite fierce competition with several early medical journals, including the <i>British Medical Journal</i> and a quack publication that called itself the <i>Anti</i>-<i>Lancet</i>, the <i>Lancet</i> continued to publish research-based information to instruct the medical community far and wide. Indeed, while fake news and anti-vaxers might seem like twenty-first-century problems, this paper shows how the <i>Lancet</i> has been addressing misinformation for two hundred years.</p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Periodicals Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Periodicals Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这篇文章追溯了《柳叶刀》从十九世纪的卑微起步到如今作为最负盛名的医学期刊之一的崛起历程。通过研究《柳叶刀》早年的发展历程以及创刊编辑托马斯-韦克利及其继任者的希望,我旨在揭示这份期刊与当时发行的其他期刊的不同之处,并保证其长盛不衰。尽管《柳叶刀》与包括《英国医学杂志》和一份自称为《反柳叶刀》的庸医刊物在内的几份早期医学期刊展开了激烈竞争,但它仍坚持发表以研究为基础的信息,为广大医学界提供指导。事实上,虽然假新闻和反疫苗者似乎是二十一世纪的问题,但本文展示了两百年来《柳叶刀》是如何应对错误信息的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Hundred Years of the Lancet: From Quack to Anti-Vax, or How the Lancet Took a Stand

Abstract:

This essay traces the rise of the Lancet from its humble nineteenth-century beginnings to its current status as one of the most prestigious medical journals. By examining the Lancet's early years and the hopes of founding editor Thomas Wakely and his successors, I aim to reveal what distinguished this journal from others circulating at the time and guaranteed its longevity. Despite fierce competition with several early medical journals, including the British Medical Journal and a quack publication that called itself the Anti-Lancet, the Lancet continued to publish research-based information to instruct the medical community far and wide. Indeed, while fake news and anti-vaxers might seem like twenty-first-century problems, this paper shows how the Lancet has been addressing misinformation for two hundred years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victorian Periodicals Review
Victorian Periodicals Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信