焦虑症及相关障碍暴露疗法的改变机制:研究议程

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kristen Benito, Andre Pittig, Jonathan Abramowitz, Joanna J. Arch, Denise Chavira, Rianne de Kleine, Alessandro S. De Nadai, Dirk Hermans, Stefan G. Hofmann, Jürgen Hoyer, Jonathan D. Huppert, Katharina Kircanski, Peter M. McEvoy, Heidi Meyer, Marie-H. Monfils, Santiago Papini, Winfried Rief, David Rosenfield, Eric A. Storch, Michael J. Telch, Michael W. Otto, Jasper A. J. Smits
{"title":"焦虑症及相关障碍暴露疗法的改变机制:研究议程","authors":"Kristen Benito, Andre Pittig, Jonathan Abramowitz, Joanna J. Arch, Denise Chavira, Rianne de Kleine, Alessandro S. De Nadai, Dirk Hermans, Stefan G. Hofmann, Jürgen Hoyer, Jonathan D. Huppert, Katharina Kircanski, Peter M. McEvoy, Heidi Meyer, Marie-H. Monfils, Santiago Papini, Winfried Rief, David Rosenfield, Eric A. Storch, Michael J. Telch, Michael W. Otto, Jasper A. J. Smits","doi":"10.1177/21677026241240727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxiety and related disorders are a significant public-health burden with rising prevalence in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. As demand for effective anxiety treatment increases, so too does the need for strategies to bolster treatment outcomes. Research on the mechanisms of exposure therapy, the frontline behavioral treatment, will be critically important for optimizing clinical outcomes. We outline an initial agenda for future research on the mechanisms of change of exposure therapy, developed in collaboration with a large international team of researchers through the Exposure Therapy Consortium. Key questions and recommendations for future research focus on four priority areas: conceptualization, measurement, study design/analysis, and individual/contextual differences. Rising to the challenge of addressing these questions will require coordinated action and availability of centralized tools that can be used across trials, settings, and research groups.","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Benito, Andre Pittig, Jonathan Abramowitz, Joanna J. Arch, Denise Chavira, Rianne de Kleine, Alessandro S. De Nadai, Dirk Hermans, Stefan G. Hofmann, Jürgen Hoyer, Jonathan D. Huppert, Katharina Kircanski, Peter M. McEvoy, Heidi Meyer, Marie-H. Monfils, Santiago Papini, Winfried Rief, David Rosenfield, Eric A. Storch, Michael J. Telch, Michael W. Otto, Jasper A. J. Smits\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21677026241240727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anxiety and related disorders are a significant public-health burden with rising prevalence in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. As demand for effective anxiety treatment increases, so too does the need for strategies to bolster treatment outcomes. Research on the mechanisms of exposure therapy, the frontline behavioral treatment, will be critically important for optimizing clinical outcomes. We outline an initial agenda for future research on the mechanisms of change of exposure therapy, developed in collaboration with a large international team of researchers through the Exposure Therapy Consortium. Key questions and recommendations for future research focus on four priority areas: conceptualization, measurement, study design/analysis, and individual/contextual differences. Rising to the challenge of addressing these questions will require coordinated action and availability of centralized tools that can be used across trials, settings, and research groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241240727\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241240727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑症及相关疾病是公共卫生的重大负担,在 COVID-19 大流行之后,其发病率不断上升。随着对焦虑症有效治疗需求的增加,对提高治疗效果的策略的需求也在增加。暴露疗法是最前沿的行为疗法,对其机制的研究对于优化临床治疗效果至关重要。我们概述了暴露疗法变化机制未来研究的初步议程,该议程是通过暴露疗法联盟与一个大型国际研究团队合作制定的。未来研究的关键问题和建议主要集中在四个优先领域:概念化、测量、研究设计/分析以及个体/环境差异。要应对解决这些问题的挑战,就必须采取协调一致的行动,并提供可用于各种试验、环境和研究小组的集中工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda
Anxiety and related disorders are a significant public-health burden with rising prevalence in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. As demand for effective anxiety treatment increases, so too does the need for strategies to bolster treatment outcomes. Research on the mechanisms of exposure therapy, the frontline behavioral treatment, will be critically important for optimizing clinical outcomes. We outline an initial agenda for future research on the mechanisms of change of exposure therapy, developed in collaboration with a large international team of researchers through the Exposure Therapy Consortium. Key questions and recommendations for future research focus on four priority areas: conceptualization, measurement, study design/analysis, and individual/contextual differences. Rising to the challenge of addressing these questions will require coordinated action and availability of centralized tools that can be used across trials, settings, and research groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信