儿童和青少年对极度早产的反思:定性描述研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anniina Väliaho , Liisa Lehtonen , Anna Axelin , Riikka Korja
{"title":"儿童和青少年对极度早产的反思:定性描述研究","authors":"Anniina Väliaho ,&nbsp;Liisa Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Anna Axelin ,&nbsp;Riikka Korja","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The survival of the smallest and most immature preterm infants, born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, has improved significantly. While there is a substantial amount of research on the neurocognitive and social outcomes of extremely premature birth, little is known about the survivors' subjective experience of being born preterm and its effect on later life.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The purpose was to study the subjective experiences of school-aged children born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, in order to understand their perspectives on how being born extremely early had affected their life.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Qualitative descriptive study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>18 school-aged children (12 girls and 6 boys, 7–15 years of age), born at 23 or 24 weeks of gestation, were interviewed. The semi-structured interview guide covered six topics about quality of life: somatic health, functioning, learning and memory, emotional health, social relations, experience of prematurity and its effect.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most children reported memories, which were told to them by parents, about their premature birth and early life. Using qualitative thematic analysis, the narratives of the children were classified into three groups: 1) the <em>go-with-the-flow children</em>, who identified little or no effect of prematurity, 2) the <em>ponderers</em>, who reflected on some effects such as minor physical challenges, and 3) the <em>hesitants</em>, who either did not connect their challenges with prematurity, or did not produce much reflection overall.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Children had been told about their early life by the parents and repeated these memories indicating that prematurity had become a significant part of the family story. Differences were found how the children reflected on the impact of prematurity in their personal life. It is essential to include preterm survivors' own perspectives already during childhood and adolescence into the research of extreme prematurity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001178/pdfft?md5=202ee10688bdbe677f0738623a677631&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001178-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections about being born extremely preterm in children and adolescents: A qualitative descriptive study\",\"authors\":\"Anniina Väliaho ,&nbsp;Liisa Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Anna Axelin ,&nbsp;Riikka Korja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The survival of the smallest and most immature preterm infants, born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, has improved significantly. While there is a substantial amount of research on the neurocognitive and social outcomes of extremely premature birth, little is known about the survivors' subjective experience of being born preterm and its effect on later life.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The purpose was to study the subjective experiences of school-aged children born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, in order to understand their perspectives on how being born extremely early had affected their life.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Qualitative descriptive study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>18 school-aged children (12 girls and 6 boys, 7–15 years of age), born at 23 or 24 weeks of gestation, were interviewed. The semi-structured interview guide covered six topics about quality of life: somatic health, functioning, learning and memory, emotional health, social relations, experience of prematurity and its effect.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most children reported memories, which were told to them by parents, about their premature birth and early life. Using qualitative thematic analysis, the narratives of the children were classified into three groups: 1) the <em>go-with-the-flow children</em>, who identified little or no effect of prematurity, 2) the <em>ponderers</em>, who reflected on some effects such as minor physical challenges, and 3) the <em>hesitants</em>, who either did not connect their challenges with prematurity, or did not produce much reflection overall.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Children had been told about their early life by the parents and repeated these memories indicating that prematurity had become a significant part of the family story. Differences were found how the children reflected on the impact of prematurity in their personal life. It is essential to include preterm survivors' own perspectives already during childhood and adolescence into the research of extreme prematurity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early human development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001178/pdfft?md5=202ee10688bdbe677f0738623a677631&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001178-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early human development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景妊娠 23-24 周出生的最小和最不成熟早产儿的存活率已大大提高。尽管对极度早产儿的神经认知和社会影响已有大量研究,但对早产儿的主观体验及其对以后生活的影响却知之甚少。研究设计定性描述研究。方法对 18 名妊娠 23-24 周出生的学龄儿童(12 名女孩和 6 名男孩,7-15 岁)进行了访谈。半结构式访谈指南涵盖了有关生活质量的六个主题:躯体健康、机能、学习和记忆、情绪健康、社会关系、早产经历及其影响。结果大多数儿童回忆了父母告诉他们的早产经历和早期生活。通过定性主题分析,儿童的叙述被分为三类:1)随波逐流的儿童,他们很少或根本没有发现早产的影响;2)深思熟虑的儿童,他们对一些影响进行了反思,如身体上的小挑战;3)犹豫不决的儿童,他们要么没有将自己的挑战与早产联系起来,要么总体上没有进行太多反思。儿童对早产对其个人生活的影响的反思方式存在差异。将早产儿在童年和青少年时期的视角纳入对极度早产儿的研究是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections about being born extremely preterm in children and adolescents: A qualitative descriptive study

Background

The survival of the smallest and most immature preterm infants, born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, has improved significantly. While there is a substantial amount of research on the neurocognitive and social outcomes of extremely premature birth, little is known about the survivors' subjective experience of being born preterm and its effect on later life.

Aims

The purpose was to study the subjective experiences of school-aged children born at 23–24 weeks of gestation, in order to understand their perspectives on how being born extremely early had affected their life.

Study design

Qualitative descriptive study.

Methods

18 school-aged children (12 girls and 6 boys, 7–15 years of age), born at 23 or 24 weeks of gestation, were interviewed. The semi-structured interview guide covered six topics about quality of life: somatic health, functioning, learning and memory, emotional health, social relations, experience of prematurity and its effect.

Results

Most children reported memories, which were told to them by parents, about their premature birth and early life. Using qualitative thematic analysis, the narratives of the children were classified into three groups: 1) the go-with-the-flow children, who identified little or no effect of prematurity, 2) the ponderers, who reflected on some effects such as minor physical challenges, and 3) the hesitants, who either did not connect their challenges with prematurity, or did not produce much reflection overall.

Conclusions

Children had been told about their early life by the parents and repeated these memories indicating that prematurity had become a significant part of the family story. Differences were found how the children reflected on the impact of prematurity in their personal life. It is essential to include preterm survivors' own perspectives already during childhood and adolescence into the research of extreme prematurity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信