SEPAR 成员中远程医疗工具在远程管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者方面的有限使用和潜在实施障碍

Q4 Medicine
Marc Vila , Javier de Miguel Diez , Vinicius Rosa De Oliveira , Alvar Agustí
{"title":"SEPAR 成员中远程医疗工具在远程管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者方面的有限使用和潜在实施障碍","authors":"Marc Vila ,&nbsp;Javier de Miguel Diez ,&nbsp;Vinicius Rosa De Oliveira ,&nbsp;Alvar Agustí","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Telemedicine (TM) can help in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines knowledge, current use and potential limitations for practical implementation of TM for the remoted management of COPD patients among members of the COPD area of SEPAR (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3118).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An electronic survey was circulated three times to these 3118 health-care professionals. Their knowledge, current use and potential limitations for implementation of different forms of TM, including tele-monitoring, tele-education and self-care, tele-rehabilitation and mobile health, for the remote management of COPD patients were tabulated and described.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only 120 health-care professionals responded to the survey (3.9%). The rate of response varied greatly across different Autonomous Communities (AACC); 99.2% of responders declared being aware of TM, but only 60.5% knew about the different TM alternatives investigated here, and only 40.3% actually used some form of TM for their current management of patients with COPD. Of those using TM, 47.1% referred being satisfied with its use. Main identified barriers for implementation of TM in their institutions were technological limitations and data security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The potential of TM for the clinical management of COPD is well known among interviewed health-care professionals, but only less than half used it currently. The potential for growth is therefore clear. We propose that SEPAR analyze critically this potential and promotes measures to achieve it for the benefit of COPD patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419/pdfft?md5=a8c55ae1b2c834b10379a6f4efbbc260&pid=1-s2.0-S2659663624000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Use and Potential Implementation Hurdles of Telemedicine Tools for the Remote Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Members of SEPAR\",\"authors\":\"Marc Vila ,&nbsp;Javier de Miguel Diez ,&nbsp;Vinicius Rosa De Oliveira ,&nbsp;Alvar Agustí\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Telemedicine (TM) can help in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines knowledge, current use and potential limitations for practical implementation of TM for the remoted management of COPD patients among members of the COPD area of SEPAR (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3118).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An electronic survey was circulated three times to these 3118 health-care professionals. Their knowledge, current use and potential limitations for implementation of different forms of TM, including tele-monitoring, tele-education and self-care, tele-rehabilitation and mobile health, for the remote management of COPD patients were tabulated and described.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only 120 health-care professionals responded to the survey (3.9%). The rate of response varied greatly across different Autonomous Communities (AACC); 99.2% of responders declared being aware of TM, but only 60.5% knew about the different TM alternatives investigated here, and only 40.3% actually used some form of TM for their current management of patients with COPD. Of those using TM, 47.1% referred being satisfied with its use. Main identified barriers for implementation of TM in their institutions were technological limitations and data security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The potential of TM for the clinical management of COPD is well known among interviewed health-care professionals, but only less than half used it currently. The potential for growth is therefore clear. We propose that SEPAR analyze critically this potential and promotes measures to achieve it for the benefit of COPD patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419/pdfft?md5=a8c55ae1b2c834b10379a6f4efbbc260&pid=1-s2.0-S2659663624000419-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言远程医疗(TM)有助于慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的治疗。本研究调查了 SEPAR COPD 地区成员(n = 3118)对远程治疗 COPD 患者的知识、当前使用情况和实际应用中的潜在限制。结果仅有 120 名医疗保健专业人员(3.9%)对调查做出了回应。不同自治区(AACC)的回复率差异很大;99.2%的回复者宣称知道TM,但只有60.5%的人知道这里调查的不同TM替代方法,只有40.3%的人在目前对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的管理中实际使用了某种形式的TM。在使用 TM 的患者中,47.1% 的人对其使用表示满意。结论受访的医护人员都知道 TM 在慢性阻塞性肺病临床管理中的潜力,但目前只有不到一半的人使用 TM。因此,其发展潜力显而易见。我们建议 SEPAR 对这一潜力进行批判性分析,并采取措施实现这一潜力,从而造福慢性阻塞性肺病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Limited Use and Potential Implementation Hurdles of Telemedicine Tools for the Remote Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Members of SEPAR

Limited Use and Potential Implementation Hurdles of Telemedicine Tools for the Remote Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Members of SEPAR

Introduction

Telemedicine (TM) can help in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines knowledge, current use and potential limitations for practical implementation of TM for the remoted management of COPD patients among members of the COPD area of SEPAR (n = 3118).

Methods

An electronic survey was circulated three times to these 3118 health-care professionals. Their knowledge, current use and potential limitations for implementation of different forms of TM, including tele-monitoring, tele-education and self-care, tele-rehabilitation and mobile health, for the remote management of COPD patients were tabulated and described.

Results

Only 120 health-care professionals responded to the survey (3.9%). The rate of response varied greatly across different Autonomous Communities (AACC); 99.2% of responders declared being aware of TM, but only 60.5% knew about the different TM alternatives investigated here, and only 40.3% actually used some form of TM for their current management of patients with COPD. Of those using TM, 47.1% referred being satisfied with its use. Main identified barriers for implementation of TM in their institutions were technological limitations and data security.

Conclusions

The potential of TM for the clinical management of COPD is well known among interviewed health-care professionals, but only less than half used it currently. The potential for growth is therefore clear. We propose that SEPAR analyze critically this potential and promotes measures to achieve it for the benefit of COPD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信