在 20 分钟跑步机行走过程中,比较叠加手术面罩或 N95 呼吸器的心肺反应时间过程和幅度

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Angela Galeos, Rodion Isakovich, Valerie C Cates, Anthony Marullo, Nicholas Strzalkowski, Trevor Day
{"title":"在 20 分钟跑步机行走过程中,比较叠加手术面罩或 N95 呼吸器的心肺反应时间过程和幅度","authors":"Angela Galeos, Rodion Isakovich, Valerie C Cates, Anthony Marullo, Nicholas Strzalkowski, Trevor Day","doi":"10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.1717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wearing medical barriers has recently expanded from healthcare to public settings, and could increase dead space and facilitate rebreathing of expired air resulting in heat accumulation, hypercapnia, and hypoxia, particularly during physical activity. We recently showed that participants wearing surgical masks (SM) and N95 respirators (N95) over 60-min during seated rest had mild and immediately reversible (a) increases face microclimate temperature, (b) increases in the pressure of end-tidal (PET)CO2, (c) decreases in PETO2, but (d) no differences in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Previous publications showed conflicting results of superimposed barrier wearing during physical activity, and there are limited studies that assessed face microclimate temperature and end-tidal gases, particularly comparing superimposed SM and N95. We hypothesized that participants wearing SM and N95 will experience mild face microclimate hyperthermia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia during 3mph treadmill walking. Participants (n=18; 8F) randomly wore (a) no barrier (NB), (b) SM or (c) N95 during a 10-min standing baseline, 20-min treadmill walking (3 mph), and a 10-min standing recovery. We continuously measured face microclimate temperature (thermistor), end tidal gases (PETCO2, PETO2; oro-nasal cannula), SpO2 (peripheral pulse oximeter). Average 20-min PETCO2 (higher; p<0.0001, P=0.0001) and PETO2 (lower; P=0.0003, P=0.0178) were significantly from baseline for both SM and N95, respectively. The delta between the 20-min average compared to the baseline data was not statistically significant for PETCO2 or PETO2 in all three conditions, except for ΔPETCO2 NB vs. N95 (higher; P=0.0344). Additionally, there was no difference in SpO2 across all barrier conditions during exercise. These mild physiological effects may account for qualitative reports of shortness of breath and increased perceived exertion while wearing barriers during physical activity. However, these effect-magnitudes are not physiologically-meaningful, and are immediately reversed upon cessation of exercise and/or barrier removal. NSERC. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.","PeriodicalId":49694,"journal":{"name":"Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Time-Course and Magnitude of Cardiorespiratory Responses to Superimposed Surgical Masks or N95 Respirators during 20-min Treadmill Walking\",\"authors\":\"Angela Galeos, Rodion Isakovich, Valerie C Cates, Anthony Marullo, Nicholas Strzalkowski, Trevor Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.1717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wearing medical barriers has recently expanded from healthcare to public settings, and could increase dead space and facilitate rebreathing of expired air resulting in heat accumulation, hypercapnia, and hypoxia, particularly during physical activity. We recently showed that participants wearing surgical masks (SM) and N95 respirators (N95) over 60-min during seated rest had mild and immediately reversible (a) increases face microclimate temperature, (b) increases in the pressure of end-tidal (PET)CO2, (c) decreases in PETO2, but (d) no differences in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Previous publications showed conflicting results of superimposed barrier wearing during physical activity, and there are limited studies that assessed face microclimate temperature and end-tidal gases, particularly comparing superimposed SM and N95. We hypothesized that participants wearing SM and N95 will experience mild face microclimate hyperthermia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia during 3mph treadmill walking. Participants (n=18; 8F) randomly wore (a) no barrier (NB), (b) SM or (c) N95 during a 10-min standing baseline, 20-min treadmill walking (3 mph), and a 10-min standing recovery. We continuously measured face microclimate temperature (thermistor), end tidal gases (PETCO2, PETO2; oro-nasal cannula), SpO2 (peripheral pulse oximeter). Average 20-min PETCO2 (higher; p<0.0001, P=0.0001) and PETO2 (lower; P=0.0003, P=0.0178) were significantly from baseline for both SM and N95, respectively. The delta between the 20-min average compared to the baseline data was not statistically significant for PETCO2 or PETO2 in all three conditions, except for ΔPETCO2 NB vs. N95 (higher; P=0.0344). Additionally, there was no difference in SpO2 across all barrier conditions during exercise. These mild physiological effects may account for qualitative reports of shortness of breath and increased perceived exertion while wearing barriers during physical activity. However, these effect-magnitudes are not physiologically-meaningful, and are immediately reversed upon cessation of exercise and/or barrier removal. NSERC. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.1717\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.1717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

佩戴医疗屏障最近已从医疗机构扩展到公共场所,可能会增加死腔,促进呼出气体的再吸入,导致热量积聚、高碳酸血症和缺氧,尤其是在体育活动期间。我们最近的研究表明,在坐着休息时佩戴外科口罩(SM)和 N95 呼吸器(N95)超过 60 分钟的参与者会出现轻微且可立即逆转的以下情况:(a) 面部微气候温度升高;(b) 潮气末二氧化碳(PET)压力升高;(c) PETO2 降低;但 (d) 周围血氧饱和度(SpO2)无差异。以前的出版物显示,在体育活动中佩戴叠加屏障的结果相互矛盾,评估面部微气候温度和潮气末气体的研究有限,特别是比较叠加 SM 和 N95 的研究。我们假设,佩戴 SM 和 N95 的参与者在每小时 3 英里的跑步机行走过程中会出现轻微的面部微气候高热、缺氧和高碳酸血症。参与者(n=18;8F)在 10 分钟站立基线、20 分钟跑步机行走(3 英里/小时)和 10 分钟站立恢复期间随机佩戴(a)无屏障(NB)、(b)SM 或(c)N95。我们连续测量面部微气候温度(温度计)、潮气末(PETCO2、PETO2;口鼻插管)、SpO2(外周脉搏血氧计)。20 分钟平均 PETCO2(较高;P<0.0001,P=0.0001)和 PETO2(较低;P=0.0003,P=0.0178)分别与 SM 和 N95 的基线相比有显著差异。除 ΔPETCO2 NB 与 N95(较高;P=0.0344)外,在所有三种情况下,20 分钟平均值与基线数据相比,PETCO2 或 PETO2 的三角差均无统计学意义。此外,在运动过程中,所有屏障条件下的 SpO2 均无差异。这些轻微的生理影响可能是在体育活动中佩戴屏障时出现呼吸急促和体力消耗增加的定性报告的原因。不过,这些影响的程度在生理上没有意义,而且在停止运动和/或移除屏障后会立即逆转。国家科学研究中心。这是在 2024 年美国生理学峰会上发表的摘要全文,仅以 HTML 格式提供。本摘要没有附加版本或附加内容。生理学》未参与同行评审过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Time-Course and Magnitude of Cardiorespiratory Responses to Superimposed Surgical Masks or N95 Respirators during 20-min Treadmill Walking
Wearing medical barriers has recently expanded from healthcare to public settings, and could increase dead space and facilitate rebreathing of expired air resulting in heat accumulation, hypercapnia, and hypoxia, particularly during physical activity. We recently showed that participants wearing surgical masks (SM) and N95 respirators (N95) over 60-min during seated rest had mild and immediately reversible (a) increases face microclimate temperature, (b) increases in the pressure of end-tidal (PET)CO2, (c) decreases in PETO2, but (d) no differences in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Previous publications showed conflicting results of superimposed barrier wearing during physical activity, and there are limited studies that assessed face microclimate temperature and end-tidal gases, particularly comparing superimposed SM and N95. We hypothesized that participants wearing SM and N95 will experience mild face microclimate hyperthermia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia during 3mph treadmill walking. Participants (n=18; 8F) randomly wore (a) no barrier (NB), (b) SM or (c) N95 during a 10-min standing baseline, 20-min treadmill walking (3 mph), and a 10-min standing recovery. We continuously measured face microclimate temperature (thermistor), end tidal gases (PETCO2, PETO2; oro-nasal cannula), SpO2 (peripheral pulse oximeter). Average 20-min PETCO2 (higher; p<0.0001, P=0.0001) and PETO2 (lower; P=0.0003, P=0.0178) were significantly from baseline for both SM and N95, respectively. The delta between the 20-min average compared to the baseline data was not statistically significant for PETCO2 or PETO2 in all three conditions, except for ΔPETCO2 NB vs. N95 (higher; P=0.0344). Additionally, there was no difference in SpO2 across all barrier conditions during exercise. These mild physiological effects may account for qualitative reports of shortness of breath and increased perceived exertion while wearing barriers during physical activity. However, these effect-magnitudes are not physiologically-meaningful, and are immediately reversed upon cessation of exercise and/or barrier removal. NSERC. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology
Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Physiology journal features meticulously crafted review articles penned by esteemed leaders in their respective fields. These articles undergo rigorous peer review and showcase the forefront of cutting-edge advances across various domains of physiology. Our Editorial Board, comprised of distinguished leaders in the broad spectrum of physiology, convenes annually to deliberate and recommend pioneering topics for review articles, as well as select the most suitable scientists to author these articles. Join us in exploring the forefront of physiological research and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信