更好地理解特发性轻度智力发育障碍:从症状到支持方法

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Gourlat, A.-C. Rattat, C.T. Albinet
{"title":"更好地理解特发性轻度智力发育障碍:从症状到支持方法","authors":"E. Gourlat,&nbsp;A.-C. Rattat,&nbsp;C.T. Albinet","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The present literature review aims to list as exhaustively as possible all the research studies carried out on MID (1) in terms of assessment and diagnosis, (2) in terms of clinical presentation and (3) from an interventional point of view. The objective is to provide keys to understand this pathology to the various health professionals in medical and paramedical fields.</div></div><div><h3>Literature findings</h3><div>Despite its high prevalence, there are few scientific studies about mild intellectual disability (MID), which causes cognitive deficits. MID is thought to affect about 1–2% of the population in France, and in nearly 80% of cases it is called idiopathic, the cause being unknown (<span><span>INSERM, 2016</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Numerous studies have proposed interventional programs with specific recommendations for this population. Definite conclusions of the reviewed literature is complicated by important heterogeneity in the methodologies used and reported results, unclear clinical presentation of MID, and methodological difficulties in groups constitution and in objective evaluation of programs effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The objective is now to summarize these methodological requirements by proposing adaptations that take into account the cognitive and behavioral profile of individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 307-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vers une meilleure compréhension du trouble du développement intellectuel léger idiopathique : des symptômes aux modalités d’accompagnement\",\"authors\":\"E. Gourlat,&nbsp;A.-C. Rattat,&nbsp;C.T. Albinet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The present literature review aims to list as exhaustively as possible all the research studies carried out on MID (1) in terms of assessment and diagnosis, (2) in terms of clinical presentation and (3) from an interventional point of view. The objective is to provide keys to understand this pathology to the various health professionals in medical and paramedical fields.</div></div><div><h3>Literature findings</h3><div>Despite its high prevalence, there are few scientific studies about mild intellectual disability (MID), which causes cognitive deficits. MID is thought to affect about 1–2% of the population in France, and in nearly 80% of cases it is called idiopathic, the cause being unknown (<span><span>INSERM, 2016</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Numerous studies have proposed interventional programs with specific recommendations for this population. Definite conclusions of the reviewed literature is complicated by important heterogeneity in the methodologies used and reported results, unclear clinical presentation of MID, and methodological difficulties in groups constitution and in objective evaluation of programs effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The objective is now to summarize these methodological requirements by proposing adaptations that take into account the cognitive and behavioral profile of individuals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 307-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文献综述旨在尽可能详尽地列出所有关于MID(1)在评估和诊断方面的研究,(2)在临床表现方面的研究,以及(3)从介入角度的研究。目的是提供关键,以了解这种病理在医疗和辅助医疗领域的各种卫生专业人员。轻度智力残疾(MID)是一种导致认知缺陷的疾病,尽管其发病率很高,但对其的科学研究却很少。MID被认为影响了法国约1-2%的人口,在近80%的病例中,它被称为特发性,原因不明(INSERM, 2016)。许多研究提出了针对这一人群的具体建议的干预方案。所回顾文献的明确结论因使用的方法和报告结果的重要异质性、MID的临床表现不明确、分组构成和项目效果客观评价的方法学困难而复杂化。现在的目标是通过提出考虑到个体认知和行为特征的适应性来总结这些方法要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vers une meilleure compréhension du trouble du développement intellectuel léger idiopathique : des symptômes aux modalités d’accompagnement

Introduction

The present literature review aims to list as exhaustively as possible all the research studies carried out on MID (1) in terms of assessment and diagnosis, (2) in terms of clinical presentation and (3) from an interventional point of view. The objective is to provide keys to understand this pathology to the various health professionals in medical and paramedical fields.

Literature findings

Despite its high prevalence, there are few scientific studies about mild intellectual disability (MID), which causes cognitive deficits. MID is thought to affect about 1–2% of the population in France, and in nearly 80% of cases it is called idiopathic, the cause being unknown (INSERM, 2016).

Discussion

Numerous studies have proposed interventional programs with specific recommendations for this population. Definite conclusions of the reviewed literature is complicated by important heterogeneity in the methodologies used and reported results, unclear clinical presentation of MID, and methodological difficulties in groups constitution and in objective evaluation of programs effects.

Conclusion

The objective is now to summarize these methodological requirements by proposing adaptations that take into account the cognitive and behavioral profile of individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信