为 "依恋创伤 "下定义:整合依恋和创伤研究

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Andrea Zagaria , Teresa Baggio , Lorenzo Rodella , Ketty Leto
{"title":"为 \"依恋创伤 \"下定义:整合依恋和创伤研究","authors":"Andrea Zagaria ,&nbsp;Teresa Baggio ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Rodella ,&nbsp;Ketty Leto","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Attachment Trauma (AT) is a known clinical heuristic in Psychology. However, different perspectives on it have emerged, leading to heterogeneity and confusion. In pursuit of clarity, this paper aims to navigate the perspectives surrounding AT through an integrative review. The review identifies six distinct lines of research. The initial three, falling under the attachment research tradition, include 1. <em>Infant disorganized attachment</em>, 2. <em>Unresolved/disorganized adult states of mind</em>, and 3. <em>Adult fearful attachment</em> in personality Psychology. The subsequent three, falling under the trauma research tradition, encompass 4. <em>Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (cPTSD)</em>, 5. <em>Early adverse experiences</em>, and the 6. <em>Biological correlates of trauma</em>. By elucidating the commonalities and disparities between these research programs the paper underscores how they seem to converge on the core concept of AT. Ultimately, a new definition of AT is put forward: “<strong>varying and long-lasting biological, psychological, and relational consequences resulting from incomplete encoding and integration of emotionally overwhelming experiences within an attachment relationship</strong>”. The definition is explained in depth, highlighting how AT may be framed as a diverse set of adaptations, rather than a diagnosis, that may nevertheless lead to maladjustment and increased risk of psychopathology. Moreover, it is argued that the biological and evolutionary nature of the attachment bond is what distinguishes the AT concept from its alternatives (e.g.,relational trauma, betrayal trauma) in terms of solidity and explanatory power.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000401/pdfft?md5=248df615523d2348a6b597f81c4d1a50&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000401-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a definition of Attachment Trauma: integrating attachment and trauma studies\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Zagaria ,&nbsp;Teresa Baggio ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Rodella ,&nbsp;Ketty Leto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Attachment Trauma (AT) is a known clinical heuristic in Psychology. However, different perspectives on it have emerged, leading to heterogeneity and confusion. In pursuit of clarity, this paper aims to navigate the perspectives surrounding AT through an integrative review. The review identifies six distinct lines of research. The initial three, falling under the attachment research tradition, include 1. <em>Infant disorganized attachment</em>, 2. <em>Unresolved/disorganized adult states of mind</em>, and 3. <em>Adult fearful attachment</em> in personality Psychology. The subsequent three, falling under the trauma research tradition, encompass 4. <em>Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (cPTSD)</em>, 5. <em>Early adverse experiences</em>, and the 6. <em>Biological correlates of trauma</em>. By elucidating the commonalities and disparities between these research programs the paper underscores how they seem to converge on the core concept of AT. Ultimately, a new definition of AT is put forward: “<strong>varying and long-lasting biological, psychological, and relational consequences resulting from incomplete encoding and integration of emotionally overwhelming experiences within an attachment relationship</strong>”. The definition is explained in depth, highlighting how AT may be framed as a diverse set of adaptations, rather than a diagnosis, that may nevertheless lead to maladjustment and increased risk of psychopathology. Moreover, it is argued that the biological and evolutionary nature of the attachment bond is what distinguishes the AT concept from its alternatives (e.g.,relational trauma, betrayal trauma) in terms of solidity and explanatory power.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000401/pdfft?md5=248df615523d2348a6b597f81c4d1a50&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000401-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

依恋创伤(AT)是众所周知的心理学临床启发式理论。然而,关于它的不同观点已经出现,导致了异质性和混乱。为了澄清这一问题,本文旨在通过综合综述,对有关依恋创伤的观点进行梳理。综述确定了六种不同的研究方向。最初的三个属于依恋研究传统,包括 1.婴儿无组织依恋;2. 未解决/无组织的成人心理状态;3.人格心理学中的成人恐惧依恋。其后三项属于创伤研究传统,包括 4.复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)、5.早期不良经历和 6.创伤的生物学相关性。通过阐明这些研究项目之间的共性和差异,本文强调了它们似乎是如何趋同于创伤后应激障碍这一核心概念的。最终,论文提出了创伤后应激障碍的新定义:"在依恋关系中,对情感上难以承受的经历进行不完整的编码和整合所导致的不同且持久的生物、心理和关系后果"。对这一定义进行了深入的解释,强调了如何将依恋关系界定为一系列不同的适应,而不是一种诊断,尽管如此,依恋关系仍可能导致适应不良和精神病理学风险的增加。此外,该书还认为,依恋纽带的生物和进化性质使 "依恋创伤 "概念在稳固性和解释力方面有别于其他概念(如关系创伤、背叛创伤)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a definition of Attachment Trauma: integrating attachment and trauma studies

Attachment Trauma (AT) is a known clinical heuristic in Psychology. However, different perspectives on it have emerged, leading to heterogeneity and confusion. In pursuit of clarity, this paper aims to navigate the perspectives surrounding AT through an integrative review. The review identifies six distinct lines of research. The initial three, falling under the attachment research tradition, include 1. Infant disorganized attachment, 2. Unresolved/disorganized adult states of mind, and 3. Adult fearful attachment in personality Psychology. The subsequent three, falling under the trauma research tradition, encompass 4. Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (cPTSD), 5. Early adverse experiences, and the 6. Biological correlates of trauma. By elucidating the commonalities and disparities between these research programs the paper underscores how they seem to converge on the core concept of AT. Ultimately, a new definition of AT is put forward: “varying and long-lasting biological, psychological, and relational consequences resulting from incomplete encoding and integration of emotionally overwhelming experiences within an attachment relationship”. The definition is explained in depth, highlighting how AT may be framed as a diverse set of adaptations, rather than a diagnosis, that may nevertheless lead to maladjustment and increased risk of psychopathology. Moreover, it is argued that the biological and evolutionary nature of the attachment bond is what distinguishes the AT concept from its alternatives (e.g.,relational trauma, betrayal trauma) in terms of solidity and explanatory power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信