元素互动性和心理预演对工作记忆资源耗竭和间隔效应的影响

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ouhao Chen , Bobo Kai Yin Chan , Ellie Anderson , Rory O’sullivan , Tim Jay , Kim Ouwehand , Fred Paas , John Sweller
{"title":"元素互动性和心理预演对工作记忆资源耗竭和间隔效应的影响","authors":"Ouhao Chen ,&nbsp;Bobo Kai Yin Chan ,&nbsp;Ellie Anderson ,&nbsp;Rory O’sullivan ,&nbsp;Tim Jay ,&nbsp;Kim Ouwehand ,&nbsp;Fred Paas ,&nbsp;John Sweller","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The spacing effect occurs when learning with rest periods is superior to learning without rest periods. Cognitive load theory has explained this superiority by working memory resource depletion, under which resources are depleted during cognitive activity but restored with rest. In a series of four experiments involving 341 participants, we explored the relationships between the spacing effect, depletion of working memory resources, and mental rehearsal, particularly focusing on how these dynamics are influenced by task complexity as defined by element interactivity. Experiment 1 showed that materials with higher element interactivity had a greater impact on working memory resource depletion. In Experiment 2, using materials low in element interactivity, a spacing effect was obtained with no evidence of working memory resource depletion. Instead, results suggested that the effect might be due to mental rehearsal occurring during rest periods. Experiment 3, using more complex information, obtained both the spacing and working memory resource depletion effects for less knowledgeable learners for whom the information was high in element interactivity. In Experiment 4, testing more knowledgeable learners for whom the same information was lower in element interactivity, both effects disappeared. The results indicated that working memory resource depletion and recovery may be more sensitive to materials high in element interactivity and suggest that it is only one of multiple causes of the spacing effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000262/pdfft?md5=4753d694ca756c0dd36842ab8cf04d41&pid=1-s2.0-S0361476X24000262-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of element interactivity and mental rehearsal on working memory resource depletion and the spacing effect\",\"authors\":\"Ouhao Chen ,&nbsp;Bobo Kai Yin Chan ,&nbsp;Ellie Anderson ,&nbsp;Rory O’sullivan ,&nbsp;Tim Jay ,&nbsp;Kim Ouwehand ,&nbsp;Fred Paas ,&nbsp;John Sweller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The spacing effect occurs when learning with rest periods is superior to learning without rest periods. Cognitive load theory has explained this superiority by working memory resource depletion, under which resources are depleted during cognitive activity but restored with rest. In a series of four experiments involving 341 participants, we explored the relationships between the spacing effect, depletion of working memory resources, and mental rehearsal, particularly focusing on how these dynamics are influenced by task complexity as defined by element interactivity. Experiment 1 showed that materials with higher element interactivity had a greater impact on working memory resource depletion. In Experiment 2, using materials low in element interactivity, a spacing effect was obtained with no evidence of working memory resource depletion. Instead, results suggested that the effect might be due to mental rehearsal occurring during rest periods. Experiment 3, using more complex information, obtained both the spacing and working memory resource depletion effects for less knowledgeable learners for whom the information was high in element interactivity. In Experiment 4, testing more knowledgeable learners for whom the same information was lower in element interactivity, both effects disappeared. The results indicated that working memory resource depletion and recovery may be more sensitive to materials high in element interactivity and suggest that it is only one of multiple causes of the spacing effect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000262/pdfft?md5=4753d694ca756c0dd36842ab8cf04d41&pid=1-s2.0-S0361476X24000262-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000262\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000262","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当有休息时间的学习优于没有休息时间的学习时,就会产生间隔效应。认知负荷理论用工作记忆资源耗竭来解释这种优越性,即在认知活动中工作记忆资源会耗竭,但在休息时工作记忆资源会恢复。在由 341 名参与者参与的四个系列实验中,我们探讨了间距效应、工作记忆资源耗竭和心理预演之间的关系,尤其关注了这些动态变化如何受到由元素互动性定义的任务复杂性的影响。实验 1 显示,元素互动性越高的材料对工作记忆资源消耗的影响越大。在实验 2 中,使用元素交互性较低的材料,获得了间隔效应,但没有工作记忆资源耗竭的证据。相反,实验结果表明,这种效应可能是由于在休息期间进行的心理预演造成的。实验 3 使用了更复杂的信息,对于知识较少的学习者来说,信息的元素交互性较高,因此获得了间距效应和工作记忆资源耗竭效应。在实验 4 中,对知识水平较高的学习者进行测试,同样的信息对他们来说元素互动性较低,这两种效应都消失了。结果表明,工作记忆资源耗竭和恢复可能对元素互动性高的材料更为敏感,并表明这只是间距效应的多种原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of element interactivity and mental rehearsal on working memory resource depletion and the spacing effect

The spacing effect occurs when learning with rest periods is superior to learning without rest periods. Cognitive load theory has explained this superiority by working memory resource depletion, under which resources are depleted during cognitive activity but restored with rest. In a series of four experiments involving 341 participants, we explored the relationships between the spacing effect, depletion of working memory resources, and mental rehearsal, particularly focusing on how these dynamics are influenced by task complexity as defined by element interactivity. Experiment 1 showed that materials with higher element interactivity had a greater impact on working memory resource depletion. In Experiment 2, using materials low in element interactivity, a spacing effect was obtained with no evidence of working memory resource depletion. Instead, results suggested that the effect might be due to mental rehearsal occurring during rest periods. Experiment 3, using more complex information, obtained both the spacing and working memory resource depletion effects for less knowledgeable learners for whom the information was high in element interactivity. In Experiment 4, testing more knowledgeable learners for whom the same information was lower in element interactivity, both effects disappeared. The results indicated that working memory resource depletion and recovery may be more sensitive to materials high in element interactivity and suggest that it is only one of multiple causes of the spacing effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信