老年人的流体智力、发散思维和聚合思维之间的关系:人口和环境变量的调节作用

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Stephanie Alcock , Aline Ferreira-Correia, Nicky Israel, Kate Cockcroft
{"title":"老年人的流体智力、发散思维和聚合思维之间的关系:人口和环境变量的调节作用","authors":"Stephanie Alcock ,&nbsp;Aline Ferreira-Correia,&nbsp;Nicky Israel,&nbsp;Kate Cockcroft","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nature of the relationship between creativity and intelligence is a matter of ongoing debate. It has been investigated in various ways using a range of methods, participants, and measures, leading to conflicting empirical findings and theoretical models. Research suggests that fluid intelligence, convergent and divergent thinking are fundamental to both creativity and intelligence. To contribute towards the creativity-intelligence debate, we investigated the relationships between these constructs in an under-researched sample of older adults (aged 64 years +). Furthermore, associations between these constructs may be influenced by demographic qualities, such as age, sex, and number of languages spoken, as well as contextual factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES) and level of education. Thus, we explored whether fluid intelligence is separately related to convergent and divergent thinking and whether the abovementioned demographic and contextual qualities moderate these relationships. Our findings suggest that both years of education and SES are important in fluid intelligence, divergent and convergent thinking, and, therefore, are likely to be influential in creative thinking. Number of languages spoken had some (negative) association with fluid intelligence but was not significantly related to either convergent or divergent thinking. Further, neither age nor sex were significantly associated with fluid intelligence, divergent thinking, or convergent thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between fluid intelligence, divergent and convergent thinking in older adults: The moderating effects of demographic and contextual variables\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Alcock ,&nbsp;Aline Ferreira-Correia,&nbsp;Nicky Israel,&nbsp;Kate Cockcroft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The nature of the relationship between creativity and intelligence is a matter of ongoing debate. It has been investigated in various ways using a range of methods, participants, and measures, leading to conflicting empirical findings and theoretical models. Research suggests that fluid intelligence, convergent and divergent thinking are fundamental to both creativity and intelligence. To contribute towards the creativity-intelligence debate, we investigated the relationships between these constructs in an under-researched sample of older adults (aged 64 years +). Furthermore, associations between these constructs may be influenced by demographic qualities, such as age, sex, and number of languages spoken, as well as contextual factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES) and level of education. Thus, we explored whether fluid intelligence is separately related to convergent and divergent thinking and whether the abovementioned demographic and contextual qualities moderate these relationships. Our findings suggest that both years of education and SES are important in fluid intelligence, divergent and convergent thinking, and, therefore, are likely to be influential in creative thinking. Number of languages spoken had some (negative) association with fluid intelligence but was not significantly related to either convergent or divergent thinking. Further, neither age nor sex were significantly associated with fluid intelligence, divergent thinking, or convergent thinking.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124000956\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124000956","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于创造力与智力之间关系的性质,一直存在争议。人们使用各种方法、参与者和测量手段对其进行了不同程度的研究,得出了相互矛盾的经验结论和理论模型。研究表明,流体智力、聚合和发散思维是创造力和智力的基础。为了对创造力与智力的争论有所贡献,我们在研究不足的老年人(64 岁以上)样本中调查了这些构念之间的关系。此外,这些构念之间的关联可能会受到人口统计学特征(如年龄、性别和语言数量)以及社会经济地位(SES)和教育水平等背景因素的影响。因此,我们探讨了流体智力是否分别与聚合思维和发散思维相关,以及上述人口和环境因素是否会缓和这些关系。我们的研究结果表明,受教育年限和社会经济地位对流体智力、发散思维和聚合思维都很重要,因此也可能对创造性思维产生影响。语言数量与流体智力有一定的(负)联系,但与聚合或发散思维都没有显著关系。此外,年龄和性别与流体智力、发散思维或聚合思维都没有明显的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between fluid intelligence, divergent and convergent thinking in older adults: The moderating effects of demographic and contextual variables

The nature of the relationship between creativity and intelligence is a matter of ongoing debate. It has been investigated in various ways using a range of methods, participants, and measures, leading to conflicting empirical findings and theoretical models. Research suggests that fluid intelligence, convergent and divergent thinking are fundamental to both creativity and intelligence. To contribute towards the creativity-intelligence debate, we investigated the relationships between these constructs in an under-researched sample of older adults (aged 64 years +). Furthermore, associations between these constructs may be influenced by demographic qualities, such as age, sex, and number of languages spoken, as well as contextual factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES) and level of education. Thus, we explored whether fluid intelligence is separately related to convergent and divergent thinking and whether the abovementioned demographic and contextual qualities moderate these relationships. Our findings suggest that both years of education and SES are important in fluid intelligence, divergent and convergent thinking, and, therefore, are likely to be influential in creative thinking. Number of languages spoken had some (negative) association with fluid intelligence but was not significantly related to either convergent or divergent thinking. Further, neither age nor sex were significantly associated with fluid intelligence, divergent thinking, or convergent thinking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信