Temitope Adebayo, Zachary Koroneos, Erdi Özdemir, Alex Herrin, Sherif El Akkari, Gregory Lewis, Umur Aydogan
{"title":"跖跗关节融合术中的套管螺钉与镍钛诺钉:尸体生物力学比较模型","authors":"Temitope Adebayo, Zachary Koroneos, Erdi Özdemir, Alex Herrin, Sherif El Akkari, Gregory Lewis, Umur Aydogan","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of a medially placed nitinol<span> staple compared to two crossed-screws in the first TMT-1 joint fusion in a cadaveric cyclic loading model.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven matched pairs (N = 7) of lower limb cadaveric specimens were utilized. TMT-1 joints from each donor were fixed with a medially placed nitinol staple or dorsally placed two 3.5 mm partially threaded cannulated crossed-screws. Specimens were tested in a 4-point bending setting with increasing cyclic forces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean plantar gapping was not significantly different between the two groups at any loading stage below 200 N. Specimens fixed with a nitinol staple failed at a mean load of 305 ± 57 N. Conversely, those fixed with crossed-screws failed at 373 ± 86 N. (<em>P</em> = .09).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was no statistical difference between a medially placed nitinol staple and dorsally placed crossed-screws in failure loads and plantar gapping under cyclic loads at the TMT-1 joint, however, the staple fixation was much more variable.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level V, basic science study, biomechanics</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"30 8","pages":"Pages 656-661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannulated screws versus nitinol staple for tarsometatarsal fusion: A cadaveric biomechanical comparison model\",\"authors\":\"Temitope Adebayo, Zachary Koroneos, Erdi Özdemir, Alex Herrin, Sherif El Akkari, Gregory Lewis, Umur Aydogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of a medially placed nitinol<span> staple compared to two crossed-screws in the first TMT-1 joint fusion in a cadaveric cyclic loading model.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven matched pairs (N = 7) of lower limb cadaveric specimens were utilized. TMT-1 joints from each donor were fixed with a medially placed nitinol staple or dorsally placed two 3.5 mm partially threaded cannulated crossed-screws. Specimens were tested in a 4-point bending setting with increasing cyclic forces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean plantar gapping was not significantly different between the two groups at any loading stage below 200 N. Specimens fixed with a nitinol staple failed at a mean load of 305 ± 57 N. Conversely, those fixed with crossed-screws failed at 373 ± 86 N. (<em>P</em> = .09).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was no statistical difference between a medially placed nitinol staple and dorsally placed crossed-screws in failure loads and plantar gapping under cyclic loads at the TMT-1 joint, however, the staple fixation was much more variable.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level V, basic science study, biomechanics</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 656-661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124001152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124001152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cannulated screws versus nitinol staple for tarsometatarsal fusion: A cadaveric biomechanical comparison model
Background
The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of a medially placed nitinol staple compared to two crossed-screws in the first TMT-1 joint fusion in a cadaveric cyclic loading model.
Methods
Seven matched pairs (N = 7) of lower limb cadaveric specimens were utilized. TMT-1 joints from each donor were fixed with a medially placed nitinol staple or dorsally placed two 3.5 mm partially threaded cannulated crossed-screws. Specimens were tested in a 4-point bending setting with increasing cyclic forces.
Results
The mean plantar gapping was not significantly different between the two groups at any loading stage below 200 N. Specimens fixed with a nitinol staple failed at a mean load of 305 ± 57 N. Conversely, those fixed with crossed-screws failed at 373 ± 86 N. (P = .09).
Conclusion
There was no statistical difference between a medially placed nitinol staple and dorsally placed crossed-screws in failure loads and plantar gapping under cyclic loads at the TMT-1 joint, however, the staple fixation was much more variable.
期刊介绍:
Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society.
The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.