统一印度尼西亚金融服务部门的调查权限

Muhammad Ridho Ramadhenta, Fx Joko Priyono
{"title":"统一印度尼西亚金融服务部门的调查权限","authors":"Muhammad Ridho Ramadhenta, Fx Joko Priyono","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of the financial services sector in Indonesia demonstrates its strategic role in the national economy. However, harmonizing investigative authorities in this sector poses a challenge that needs to be addressed to maintain stability and public trust. This paper aims to investigate the issue of harmonizing investigative authorities in the Indonesian financial services sector, focusing on regulatory frameworks, case developments, and potential harmonization models. The evolution of investigative authority regulations in the financial services sector is outlined, identifying weaknesses in the system that need to be addressed. Case studies provide a concrete overview of the challenges faced in field investigations. A harmonization model for investigative authorities is proposed as a solution to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of investigations. Under this harmonization model, OJK investigators are not the sole authority to conduct investigations in the financial services sector, but their authority must be elaborated with that of the POLRI or PPNS investigators as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Article 49 paragraph (5) of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Services Sector (P2SK Law), which essentially states that criminal investigations in the financial services sector can only be conducted by OJK investigators through a harmonization model of investigative authority in the financial services sector in Indonesia, should be elaborated so that investigative authority in the financial services sector can be carried out by POLRI or PPNS with the assistance of OJK investigators.","PeriodicalId":505942,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonization of Authority in the Investigation of the Financial Services Sector in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ridho Ramadhenta, Fx Joko Priyono\",\"doi\":\"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid growth of the financial services sector in Indonesia demonstrates its strategic role in the national economy. However, harmonizing investigative authorities in this sector poses a challenge that needs to be addressed to maintain stability and public trust. This paper aims to investigate the issue of harmonizing investigative authorities in the Indonesian financial services sector, focusing on regulatory frameworks, case developments, and potential harmonization models. The evolution of investigative authority regulations in the financial services sector is outlined, identifying weaknesses in the system that need to be addressed. Case studies provide a concrete overview of the challenges faced in field investigations. A harmonization model for investigative authorities is proposed as a solution to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of investigations. Under this harmonization model, OJK investigators are not the sole authority to conduct investigations in the financial services sector, but their authority must be elaborated with that of the POLRI or PPNS investigators as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Article 49 paragraph (5) of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Services Sector (P2SK Law), which essentially states that criminal investigations in the financial services sector can only be conducted by OJK investigators through a harmonization model of investigative authority in the financial services sector in Indonesia, should be elaborated so that investigative authority in the financial services sector can be carried out by POLRI or PPNS with the assistance of OJK investigators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚金融服务部门的快速发展表明了其在国民经济中的战略作用。然而,协调该部门的调查机构是一项挑战,需要加以解决,以维护稳定和公众信任。本文旨在研究印尼金融服务部门调查机构的协调问题,重点关注监管框架、案例发展和潜在的协调模式。本文概述了金融服务部门调查机构法规的演变,指出了该系统中需要解决的薄弱环节。案例研究具体概述了实地调查面临的挑战。提出了一个调查机构统一模式,作为提高调查效力和效率的解决方案。根据这一协调模式,韩国司法厅调查员不是金融服务部门进行调查的唯一权威,但他们的权威必须与《刑事诉讼法》(KUHAP)中规定的 POLRI 或 PPNS 调查员的权威相一致。关于金融服务部门的 2023 年第 4 号法律(《P2SK 法》)第 49 条第(5)款主要规定,金融服务部门的刑事调查只能由印尼司法部调查员通过印尼金融服务部门调查权的统一模式进行,该条款应予以详细说明,以便印尼警察与犯罪调查局或印尼国家警察调查局可在印尼司法部调查员的协助下行使金融服务部门的调查权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harmonization of Authority in the Investigation of the Financial Services Sector in Indonesia
The rapid growth of the financial services sector in Indonesia demonstrates its strategic role in the national economy. However, harmonizing investigative authorities in this sector poses a challenge that needs to be addressed to maintain stability and public trust. This paper aims to investigate the issue of harmonizing investigative authorities in the Indonesian financial services sector, focusing on regulatory frameworks, case developments, and potential harmonization models. The evolution of investigative authority regulations in the financial services sector is outlined, identifying weaknesses in the system that need to be addressed. Case studies provide a concrete overview of the challenges faced in field investigations. A harmonization model for investigative authorities is proposed as a solution to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of investigations. Under this harmonization model, OJK investigators are not the sole authority to conduct investigations in the financial services sector, but their authority must be elaborated with that of the POLRI or PPNS investigators as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Article 49 paragraph (5) of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Services Sector (P2SK Law), which essentially states that criminal investigations in the financial services sector can only be conducted by OJK investigators through a harmonization model of investigative authority in the financial services sector in Indonesia, should be elaborated so that investigative authority in the financial services sector can be carried out by POLRI or PPNS with the assistance of OJK investigators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信