挑战政策空间:智利养老金政策中替代方案的合法化(1980-2019 年)

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Joaquín Rozas-Bugueño, Antoine Maillet
{"title":"挑战政策空间:智利养老金政策中替代方案的合法化(1980-2019 年)","authors":"Joaquín Rozas-Bugueño,&nbsp;Antoine Maillet","doi":"10.1111/lamp.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In October 2019, Chile experienced its most significant cycle of protests since the return to democracy in 1990; one of the primary demands of this cycle was the improvement of pensions. What effect did the October upheaval have on the Chilean pension policy debate? How have ideas about the Chilean pension plan changed from its creation in 1981−2019? What are the main drivers of these changes? In this study, we propose the concept of policy space, which we define as the realm of ideas wherein public policies are debated and whose boundaries are determined by the legitimacy of ideas from relevant actors. We use a process-tracing approach based on qualitative data triangulation from several techniques including in-depth interviews, press analysis, and secondary document review. The findings indicate that the shift in the ideas related to pension policy is explained by two drivers—long-term linkage among actors and short-term social mobilization against the private pension system, which accelerated rapidly with the October 2019 protests.</p>","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"15 2","pages":"235-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lamp.12343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the policy space: The legitimation of alternatives in Chilean pension policy (1980–2019)\",\"authors\":\"Joaquín Rozas-Bugueño,&nbsp;Antoine Maillet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lamp.12343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In October 2019, Chile experienced its most significant cycle of protests since the return to democracy in 1990; one of the primary demands of this cycle was the improvement of pensions. What effect did the October upheaval have on the Chilean pension policy debate? How have ideas about the Chilean pension plan changed from its creation in 1981−2019? What are the main drivers of these changes? In this study, we propose the concept of policy space, which we define as the realm of ideas wherein public policies are debated and whose boundaries are determined by the legitimacy of ideas from relevant actors. We use a process-tracing approach based on qualitative data triangulation from several techniques including in-depth interviews, press analysis, and secondary document review. The findings indicate that the shift in the ideas related to pension policy is explained by two drivers—long-term linkage among actors and short-term social mobilization against the private pension system, which accelerated rapidly with the October 2019 protests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"235-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lamp.12343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019 年 10 月,智利经历了自 1990 年恢复民主以来最重要的一轮抗议活动;这一轮抗议活动的主要诉求之一是改善养老金。十月动乱对智利养老金政策辩论产生了什么影响?从 1981 年智利养老金计划制定到 2019 年,有关该计划的观点发生了哪些变化?这些变化的主要驱动因素是什么?在本研究中,我们提出了政策空间的概念,并将其定义为公共政策辩论的思想领域,其边界由相关参与者的思想合法性决定。我们采用了一种基于定性数据三角测量的过程追踪方法,这些定性数据来自深度访谈、新闻分析和二手文献审查等多种技术。研究结果表明,与养老金政策相关的观念转变有两个驱动因素,一个是参与者之间的长期联系,另一个是反对私人养老金制度的短期社会动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Challenging the policy space: The legitimation of alternatives in Chilean pension policy (1980–2019)

Challenging the policy space: The legitimation of alternatives in Chilean pension policy (1980–2019)

In October 2019, Chile experienced its most significant cycle of protests since the return to democracy in 1990; one of the primary demands of this cycle was the improvement of pensions. What effect did the October upheaval have on the Chilean pension policy debate? How have ideas about the Chilean pension plan changed from its creation in 1981−2019? What are the main drivers of these changes? In this study, we propose the concept of policy space, which we define as the realm of ideas wherein public policies are debated and whose boundaries are determined by the legitimacy of ideas from relevant actors. We use a process-tracing approach based on qualitative data triangulation from several techniques including in-depth interviews, press analysis, and secondary document review. The findings indicate that the shift in the ideas related to pension policy is explained by two drivers—long-term linkage among actors and short-term social mobilization against the private pension system, which accelerated rapidly with the October 2019 protests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Policy
Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信