具体与抽象

Ricardo Limongi, D. Pimenta, André Luiz Barbosa da Silva, Rafael Barreiros Porto, Alessandra Cristina Gomes
{"title":"具体与抽象","authors":"Ricardo Limongi, D. Pimenta, André Luiz Barbosa da Silva, Rafael Barreiros Porto, Alessandra Cristina Gomes","doi":"10.5585/remark.v23i2.22190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Posting content on social media by companies, especially smaller ones, is a reality; however, entrepreneurs still need to discover commercial returns from this content. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the prediction of visual content manipulation in social media posts on a small company's commercial business results.\nDesign/Methodology/Approach: Our research was conducted via a quasi-experiment in a natural environment over 144 days in a business social media profile that sells its products in a physical store and via an app. Two types of publication content were manipulated: concrete and abstract.\nFindings:  The content of social media posts affected sales differently, depending on whether they were concrete or abstract. Concrete posts increased sales (in-store and via app) on the same day, while abstract posts increased sales the day after the post, especially considering the period.\nOriginality/value: Our study contributes to the discussion of how the typology of the posts can influence a company's commercial result, going beyond the metrics assessment of social media platforms to the company's cash flow.\n","PeriodicalId":506809,"journal":{"name":"ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing","volume":"57 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concrete vs. abstract\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Limongi, D. Pimenta, André Luiz Barbosa da Silva, Rafael Barreiros Porto, Alessandra Cristina Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/remark.v23i2.22190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Posting content on social media by companies, especially smaller ones, is a reality; however, entrepreneurs still need to discover commercial returns from this content. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the prediction of visual content manipulation in social media posts on a small company's commercial business results.\\nDesign/Methodology/Approach: Our research was conducted via a quasi-experiment in a natural environment over 144 days in a business social media profile that sells its products in a physical store and via an app. Two types of publication content were manipulated: concrete and abstract.\\nFindings:  The content of social media posts affected sales differently, depending on whether they were concrete or abstract. Concrete posts increased sales (in-store and via app) on the same day, while abstract posts increased sales the day after the post, especially considering the period.\\nOriginality/value: Our study contributes to the discussion of how the typology of the posts can influence a company's commercial result, going beyond the metrics assessment of social media platforms to the company's cash flow.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":506809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing\",\"volume\":\"57 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v23i2.22190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v23i2.22190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:公司,尤其是小型公司在社交媒体上发布内容已成为现实;然而,企业家仍需要从这些内容中发现商业回报。因此,我们的研究旨在评估社交媒体帖子中的视觉内容操作对小型公司商业经营成果的预测:我们的研究是在自然环境下,通过一个为期 144 天的准实验进行的,实验对象是一家通过实体店和应用程序销售产品的企业社交媒体个人主页。我们对两种类型的发布内容进行了操作:具体和抽象: 社交媒体帖子的内容对销售额的影响不同,这取决于帖子是具体的还是抽象的。具体的帖子增加了当天的销售额(店内和通过应用程序),而抽象的帖子则增加了帖子发布后第二天的销售额,特别是考虑到时间段:我们的研究有助于讨论帖子的类型如何影响公司的商业成果,超越了社交媒体平台的指标评估,影响到公司的现金流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concrete vs. abstract
Purpose: Posting content on social media by companies, especially smaller ones, is a reality; however, entrepreneurs still need to discover commercial returns from this content. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the prediction of visual content manipulation in social media posts on a small company's commercial business results. Design/Methodology/Approach: Our research was conducted via a quasi-experiment in a natural environment over 144 days in a business social media profile that sells its products in a physical store and via an app. Two types of publication content were manipulated: concrete and abstract. Findings:  The content of social media posts affected sales differently, depending on whether they were concrete or abstract. Concrete posts increased sales (in-store and via app) on the same day, while abstract posts increased sales the day after the post, especially considering the period. Originality/value: Our study contributes to the discussion of how the typology of the posts can influence a company's commercial result, going beyond the metrics assessment of social media platforms to the company's cash flow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信