纯竹林和竹阔叶混交林中尿素-15N 去向的比较研究

Yiyuan Wu, Wenyuan Dong, Huan Zhong, Jixia Duan, Weidong Li, Chan Pu, Xin Li, Zexuan Xie
{"title":"纯竹林和竹阔叶混交林中尿素-15N 去向的比较研究","authors":"Yiyuan Wu, Wenyuan Dong, Huan Zhong, Jixia Duan, Weidong Li, Chan Pu, Xin Li, Zexuan Xie","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2024.1382934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bamboo is a globally significant plant with ecological, environmental, and economic bene-fits. Choosing suitable native tree species for mixed planting in bamboo forests is an effective measure for achieving both ecological and economic benefits of bamboo forests. However, little is currently known about the impact of bamboo forests on nitrogen cycling and utilization efficiency after mixing with other tree species. Therefore, our study aims to compare the nitrogen cycling in pure bamboo forests with that in mixed forests.Through field experiments, we investigated pure Qiongzhuea tumidinoda forests and Q. tumidinoda-Phellodendron chinense mixed forests, and utilized 15N tracing technology to explore the fertilization effects and fate of urea-15N in different forest stands.The results demonstrated the following: 1) in both forest stands, bamboo culms account for the highest biomass percentage (42.99%-51.86%), while the leaves exhibited the highest nitrogen concentration and total nitrogen uptake (39.25%-44.52%/29.51%-33.21%, respectively) Additionally, the average nitrogen uptake rate of one-year-old bamboo is higher (0.25 mg kg-1 a-1) compared to other age groups. 2) the urea-15N absorption in mixed forests (1066.51–1141.61 g ha-1, including 949.65–1000.07 g ha-1 for bamboo and 116.86–141.54 g ha-1 for trees) was significantly higher than that in pure forests (663.93–727.62 g ha-1, P<0.05). Additionally, the 15N recovery efficiency of culms, branches, leaves, stumps, and stump roots in mixed forests was significantly higher than that in pure forests, with increases of 43.14%, 69.09%, 36.84%, 51.63%, 69.18%, 34.60%, and 26.89%, respectively. 3) the recovery efficiency of urea-15N in mixed forests (45.81%, comprising 40.43% for bamboo and 5.38% for trees) and the residual urea-15N recovery rate in the 0–60 cm soil layer (23.46%) are significantly higher compared to those in pure forests (28.61%/18.89%). This could be attributed to the nitrogen losses in mixed forests (30.73%, including losses from ammonia volatilization, runoff, leaching, and nitrification-denitrification) being significantly lower than those in pure forests (52.50%).These findings suggest that compared to pure bamboo forests, bamboo in mixed forests exhibits higher nitrogen recovery efficiency, particularly with one-year-old bamboo playing a crucial role.","PeriodicalId":505607,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Plant Science","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of urea-15N fate in pure bamboo and bamboo-broadleaf mixed forests\",\"authors\":\"Yiyuan Wu, Wenyuan Dong, Huan Zhong, Jixia Duan, Weidong Li, Chan Pu, Xin Li, Zexuan Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpls.2024.1382934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bamboo is a globally significant plant with ecological, environmental, and economic bene-fits. Choosing suitable native tree species for mixed planting in bamboo forests is an effective measure for achieving both ecological and economic benefits of bamboo forests. However, little is currently known about the impact of bamboo forests on nitrogen cycling and utilization efficiency after mixing with other tree species. Therefore, our study aims to compare the nitrogen cycling in pure bamboo forests with that in mixed forests.Through field experiments, we investigated pure Qiongzhuea tumidinoda forests and Q. tumidinoda-Phellodendron chinense mixed forests, and utilized 15N tracing technology to explore the fertilization effects and fate of urea-15N in different forest stands.The results demonstrated the following: 1) in both forest stands, bamboo culms account for the highest biomass percentage (42.99%-51.86%), while the leaves exhibited the highest nitrogen concentration and total nitrogen uptake (39.25%-44.52%/29.51%-33.21%, respectively) Additionally, the average nitrogen uptake rate of one-year-old bamboo is higher (0.25 mg kg-1 a-1) compared to other age groups. 2) the urea-15N absorption in mixed forests (1066.51–1141.61 g ha-1, including 949.65–1000.07 g ha-1 for bamboo and 116.86–141.54 g ha-1 for trees) was significantly higher than that in pure forests (663.93–727.62 g ha-1, P<0.05). Additionally, the 15N recovery efficiency of culms, branches, leaves, stumps, and stump roots in mixed forests was significantly higher than that in pure forests, with increases of 43.14%, 69.09%, 36.84%, 51.63%, 69.18%, 34.60%, and 26.89%, respectively. 3) the recovery efficiency of urea-15N in mixed forests (45.81%, comprising 40.43% for bamboo and 5.38% for trees) and the residual urea-15N recovery rate in the 0–60 cm soil layer (23.46%) are significantly higher compared to those in pure forests (28.61%/18.89%). This could be attributed to the nitrogen losses in mixed forests (30.73%, including losses from ammonia volatilization, runoff, leaching, and nitrification-denitrification) being significantly lower than those in pure forests (52.50%).These findings suggest that compared to pure bamboo forests, bamboo in mixed forests exhibits higher nitrogen recovery efficiency, particularly with one-year-old bamboo playing a crucial role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Plant Science\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Plant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1382934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1382934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

竹子是一种具有生态、环境和经济效益的全球重要植物。选择合适的乡土树种混植于竹林是实现竹林生态和经济效益的有效措施。然而,目前人们对竹林与其他树种混交后对氮循环和利用效率的影响知之甚少。因此,我们的研究旨在比较纯竹林与混交林的氮循环情况。我们通过野外试验,调查了琼竹纯林和琼竹-黄檗混交林,并利用 15N 追踪技术探讨了尿素-15N 在不同林分中的施肥效应和去向:1)在两种林分中,竹秆的生物量占比最高(42.99%-51.86%),而竹叶的氮浓度和总氮吸收率最高(分别为 39.25%-44.52%/29.51%-33.21%),此外,一龄竹的平均氮吸收率(0.25 mg kg-1 a-1)高于其他龄组。2)混交林的尿素-15N 吸收量(1066.51-1141.61 g ha-1,其中竹子为 949.65-1000.07 g ha-1,树木为 116.86-141.54 g ha-1)明显高于纯林(663.93-727.62 g ha-1,P<0.05)。此外,混交林秆、枝、叶、树桩和树桩根的 15N 回收效率也明显高于纯林,分别增加了 43.14%、69.09%、36.84%、51.63%、69.18%、34.60% 和 26.89%。3)混交林中尿素-15N 的回收率(45.81%,其中竹子为 40.43%,树木为 5.38%)和 0-60 厘米土层中残留尿素-15N 的回收率(23.46%)明显高于纯林(28.61%/18.89%)。这可能是因为混交林的氮损失(30.73%,包括氨挥发、径流、淋溶和硝化-反硝化损失)明显低于纯林(52.50%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of urea-15N fate in pure bamboo and bamboo-broadleaf mixed forests
Bamboo is a globally significant plant with ecological, environmental, and economic bene-fits. Choosing suitable native tree species for mixed planting in bamboo forests is an effective measure for achieving both ecological and economic benefits of bamboo forests. However, little is currently known about the impact of bamboo forests on nitrogen cycling and utilization efficiency after mixing with other tree species. Therefore, our study aims to compare the nitrogen cycling in pure bamboo forests with that in mixed forests.Through field experiments, we investigated pure Qiongzhuea tumidinoda forests and Q. tumidinoda-Phellodendron chinense mixed forests, and utilized 15N tracing technology to explore the fertilization effects and fate of urea-15N in different forest stands.The results demonstrated the following: 1) in both forest stands, bamboo culms account for the highest biomass percentage (42.99%-51.86%), while the leaves exhibited the highest nitrogen concentration and total nitrogen uptake (39.25%-44.52%/29.51%-33.21%, respectively) Additionally, the average nitrogen uptake rate of one-year-old bamboo is higher (0.25 mg kg-1 a-1) compared to other age groups. 2) the urea-15N absorption in mixed forests (1066.51–1141.61 g ha-1, including 949.65–1000.07 g ha-1 for bamboo and 116.86–141.54 g ha-1 for trees) was significantly higher than that in pure forests (663.93–727.62 g ha-1, P<0.05). Additionally, the 15N recovery efficiency of culms, branches, leaves, stumps, and stump roots in mixed forests was significantly higher than that in pure forests, with increases of 43.14%, 69.09%, 36.84%, 51.63%, 69.18%, 34.60%, and 26.89%, respectively. 3) the recovery efficiency of urea-15N in mixed forests (45.81%, comprising 40.43% for bamboo and 5.38% for trees) and the residual urea-15N recovery rate in the 0–60 cm soil layer (23.46%) are significantly higher compared to those in pure forests (28.61%/18.89%). This could be attributed to the nitrogen losses in mixed forests (30.73%, including losses from ammonia volatilization, runoff, leaching, and nitrification-denitrification) being significantly lower than those in pure forests (52.50%).These findings suggest that compared to pure bamboo forests, bamboo in mixed forests exhibits higher nitrogen recovery efficiency, particularly with one-year-old bamboo playing a crucial role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信