公元 8 世纪中叶死海变迁沿线的地震序列

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jefferson Williams
{"title":"公元 8 世纪中叶死海变迁沿线的地震序列","authors":"Jefferson Williams","doi":"10.4401/ag-8836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used to characterize and construct a timeline for a series of earthquakeswhich struck the vicinity of the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE. Particular attention was paid to nearly coincidental dates reported in Byzantine, Coptic and Judaic sources along with the time of day reported in three different textual accounts: Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahre, an apparently local and contemporaneous source, along with Severus Ibn al-Muqaffa’ and Mujir al‑Din both of whom sourced earlier accounts which were written in the first person and purport to reproduce eye-witness testimony. The timeline, supported by archaeoseismic evidence in Bet She’an and Pella, suggests that the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes likely struck within 17 hours of each other, the first one at night and the next one the following morning, between the Julian calendar dates of 16 and 19 January in 749 CE rather than being separated by 3 years. Insight from historical scholarship was used in conjunction with other observations to propose reasons why the disparate earthquake accounts present seemingly incompatible reports of earthquake timing. While the conclusions of this article provide a hypothetical rather than a definitive solution to the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes conundrum, it does appear that some sort of seismic unzipping1 occurred within a short amount of time and a number of destructive earthquakes, perhaps as many as six, impacted the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE leading to widespread devastation from South to North and points in between.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-8th Century CE Seismic Sequences Along the Dead Sea Transform\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.4401/ag-8836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used to characterize and construct a timeline for a series of earthquakeswhich struck the vicinity of the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE. Particular attention was paid to nearly coincidental dates reported in Byzantine, Coptic and Judaic sources along with the time of day reported in three different textual accounts: Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahre, an apparently local and contemporaneous source, along with Severus Ibn al-Muqaffa’ and Mujir al‑Din both of whom sourced earlier accounts which were written in the first person and purport to reproduce eye-witness testimony. The timeline, supported by archaeoseismic evidence in Bet She’an and Pella, suggests that the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes likely struck within 17 hours of each other, the first one at night and the next one the following morning, between the Julian calendar dates of 16 and 19 January in 749 CE rather than being separated by 3 years. Insight from historical scholarship was used in conjunction with other observations to propose reasons why the disparate earthquake accounts present seemingly incompatible reports of earthquake timing. While the conclusions of this article provide a hypothetical rather than a definitive solution to the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes conundrum, it does appear that some sort of seismic unzipping1 occurred within a short amount of time and a number of destructive earthquakes, perhaps as many as six, impacted the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE leading to widespread devastation from South to North and points in between.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8836\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对文字、古地震、古地震、海啸和古滑坡证据的全面研究,确定了公元 8 世纪中叶袭击死海变迁附近地区的一系列地震的特征并构建了时间线。研究人员特别关注了拜占庭、科普特和犹太教资料中报告的几乎重合的日期,以及三种不同文字记载中报告的时间:Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahre(显然是当地和同时代的资料来源)、Severus Ibn al-Muqaffa' 和 Mujir al-Din(两人的资料来源都是以第一人称撰写的早期记载,旨在再现目击者的证词)。时间线得到了 Bet She'an 和佩拉的考古地震证据的支持,表明安息年地震很可能是在公元 749 年 1 月 16 日和 19 日之间的 17 个小时内相继发生的,第一次地震发生在晚上,第二次地震发生在第二天早上,而不是相隔 3 年。历史学术研究的洞察力与其他观察结果相结合,提出了为什么不同的地震记载对地震时间的报告看似不一致的原因。虽然本文的结论为安息年地震之谜提供了一个假设性而非确定性的解决方案,但似乎在很短的时间内就发生了某种地震解压1 ,并在公元 8 世纪中叶发生了多次破坏性地震(可能多达六次),影响了死海变迁,导致从南到北以及中间各点的大范围破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mid-8th Century CE Seismic Sequences Along the Dead Sea Transform
A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used A comprehensive examination of textual, archaeoseismic, paleoseismic, tsunamogenic, and paleo-landslide evidence was used to characterize and construct a timeline for a series of earthquakeswhich struck the vicinity of the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE. Particular attention was paid to nearly coincidental dates reported in Byzantine, Coptic and Judaic sources along with the time of day reported in three different textual accounts: Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahre, an apparently local and contemporaneous source, along with Severus Ibn al-Muqaffa’ and Mujir al‑Din both of whom sourced earlier accounts which were written in the first person and purport to reproduce eye-witness testimony. The timeline, supported by archaeoseismic evidence in Bet She’an and Pella, suggests that the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes likely struck within 17 hours of each other, the first one at night and the next one the following morning, between the Julian calendar dates of 16 and 19 January in 749 CE rather than being separated by 3 years. Insight from historical scholarship was used in conjunction with other observations to propose reasons why the disparate earthquake accounts present seemingly incompatible reports of earthquake timing. While the conclusions of this article provide a hypothetical rather than a definitive solution to the Sabbatical Year Earthquakes conundrum, it does appear that some sort of seismic unzipping1 occurred within a short amount of time and a number of destructive earthquakes, perhaps as many as six, impacted the Dead Sea Transform in the middle of the 8th century CE leading to widespread devastation from South to North and points in between.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信