"政治浪漫主义 "与 "审美政治学":内容、比较、批评

K. G. Mal’tsev, A. Maltseva, L. Lomako
{"title":"\"政治浪漫主义 \"与 \"审美政治学\":内容、比较、批评","authors":"K. G. Mal’tsev, A. Maltseva, L. Lomako","doi":"10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-2-236-251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In Western political philosophy and political theory, the judgment that modern democracy does not have a satisfactory general (\"synoptic\") theory, has the status of (almost) universal significance ‒ the philosophical interpretation of this \"situation\" is an urgent research task for modern political philosophy.Purpose. The representation of the political in the \"concept of the political\" and the \"economic paradigm of the political\" reveals identical characteristic features; the configuration of their unity and the assessment attributed to them differ ‒ the goal is to understand the different meanings attributed to the same \"phenomena\" and \"processes\" of modernity in conceptual frameworks defined by opposite paradigms.Objectives. The method of determining the actual policy in the horizon of \"metaphysical principles\" is demonstrated. The fundamentals of the paradigmatic representation of the political and the principles of constructing the narrative of modern liberal democracy are revealed. The procedure of giving credibility to theoretical judgments about the political is analyzed.  Methodology. The paradigmatic representation of the political can be understood, and only as a result explained; understanding refers to the real concept, explanation – to reality; the combination of the \"real\" and \"real\" distinguished in the tradition of Western philosophy takes place in a philosophical concept; the formation of the concept presupposes philosophical interest; philosophical hermeneutics and deduction provide tools suitable for understanding the political in unity: from \"metaphysical foundations\" to practical politics. Results. The statement about the romantic nature of the modern representation of the political in the liberal economic paradigm looks reliable. It is proved that historical and aesthetic representation, more than «mimetic», fulfills the imperatives attributed to the modern form of political – Western representative democracy. The evidence of the necessary replacement of the «center of political ontology» from the sovereign to an «empty place» is demonstrated.Conclusions. Representative democracy, romantic and postmodern, is a necessary and legitimate form of the modern liberal way of representing the political. The main task of aesthetic politics is supposed to ensure security: \"keep to the middle and avoid extremes\", exclude an event, normalize the political, that is, to banalize politics.","PeriodicalId":425065,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Political Romanticism\\\" and \\\"Aesthetic Politics\\\": Content, Comparison, Criticism\",\"authors\":\"K. G. Mal’tsev, A. Maltseva, L. Lomako\",\"doi\":\"10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-2-236-251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. In Western political philosophy and political theory, the judgment that modern democracy does not have a satisfactory general (\\\"synoptic\\\") theory, has the status of (almost) universal significance ‒ the philosophical interpretation of this \\\"situation\\\" is an urgent research task for modern political philosophy.Purpose. The representation of the political in the \\\"concept of the political\\\" and the \\\"economic paradigm of the political\\\" reveals identical characteristic features; the configuration of their unity and the assessment attributed to them differ ‒ the goal is to understand the different meanings attributed to the same \\\"phenomena\\\" and \\\"processes\\\" of modernity in conceptual frameworks defined by opposite paradigms.Objectives. The method of determining the actual policy in the horizon of \\\"metaphysical principles\\\" is demonstrated. The fundamentals of the paradigmatic representation of the political and the principles of constructing the narrative of modern liberal democracy are revealed. The procedure of giving credibility to theoretical judgments about the political is analyzed.  Methodology. The paradigmatic representation of the political can be understood, and only as a result explained; understanding refers to the real concept, explanation – to reality; the combination of the \\\"real\\\" and \\\"real\\\" distinguished in the tradition of Western philosophy takes place in a philosophical concept; the formation of the concept presupposes philosophical interest; philosophical hermeneutics and deduction provide tools suitable for understanding the political in unity: from \\\"metaphysical foundations\\\" to practical politics. Results. The statement about the romantic nature of the modern representation of the political in the liberal economic paradigm looks reliable. It is proved that historical and aesthetic representation, more than «mimetic», fulfills the imperatives attributed to the modern form of political – Western representative democracy. The evidence of the necessary replacement of the «center of political ontology» from the sovereign to an «empty place» is demonstrated.Conclusions. Representative democracy, romantic and postmodern, is a necessary and legitimate form of the modern liberal way of representing the political. The main task of aesthetic politics is supposed to ensure security: \\\"keep to the middle and avoid extremes\\\", exclude an event, normalize the political, that is, to banalize politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-2-236-251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-2-236-251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相关性。在西方政治哲学和政治理论中,关于现代民主没有令人满意的一般("综合")理论的判断具有(几乎)普遍意义--对这种 "状况 "的哲学解释是现代政治哲学的一项紧迫研究任务。政治在 "政治的概念 "和 "政治的经济范式 "中的表述揭示了相同的特征;它们的统一性配置和对它们的评价却各不相同--我们的目标是理解在相反范式定义的概念框架中赋予现代性的相同 "现象 "和 "过程 "的不同含义。展示在 "形而上学原则 "视野中确定实际政策的方法。揭示了政治范式表述的基本原理和构建现代自由民主叙事的原则。分析了赋予政治理论判断可信性的程序。 方法论。政治的范式表征是可以理解的,其结果是可以解释的;理解是指真正的概念,解释是指现实;西方哲学传统中的 "真正 "和 "现实 "的结合是在哲学概念中实现的;概念的形成以哲学兴趣为前提;哲学诠释学和演绎法为统一理解政治提供了合适的工具:从 "形而上学基础 "到实践政治。结果。关于自由经济范式中政治的现代表述的浪漫性质的说法看起来是可靠的。事实证明,历史和美学表征比 "模仿 "更能满足现代政治形式--西方代议制民主--的要求。结论。代议制民主,无论是浪漫的还是后现代的,都是现代自由主义政治表述方式的一种必要而合法的形式。美学政治的主要任务应该是确保安全:美学政治的主要任务是确保安全:"保持中庸,避免极端",排除事件,使政治正常化,也就是使政治平庸化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Political Romanticism" and "Aesthetic Politics": Content, Comparison, Criticism
Relevance. In Western political philosophy and political theory, the judgment that modern democracy does not have a satisfactory general ("synoptic") theory, has the status of (almost) universal significance ‒ the philosophical interpretation of this "situation" is an urgent research task for modern political philosophy.Purpose. The representation of the political in the "concept of the political" and the "economic paradigm of the political" reveals identical characteristic features; the configuration of their unity and the assessment attributed to them differ ‒ the goal is to understand the different meanings attributed to the same "phenomena" and "processes" of modernity in conceptual frameworks defined by opposite paradigms.Objectives. The method of determining the actual policy in the horizon of "metaphysical principles" is demonstrated. The fundamentals of the paradigmatic representation of the political and the principles of constructing the narrative of modern liberal democracy are revealed. The procedure of giving credibility to theoretical judgments about the political is analyzed.  Methodology. The paradigmatic representation of the political can be understood, and only as a result explained; understanding refers to the real concept, explanation – to reality; the combination of the "real" and "real" distinguished in the tradition of Western philosophy takes place in a philosophical concept; the formation of the concept presupposes philosophical interest; philosophical hermeneutics and deduction provide tools suitable for understanding the political in unity: from "metaphysical foundations" to practical politics. Results. The statement about the romantic nature of the modern representation of the political in the liberal economic paradigm looks reliable. It is proved that historical and aesthetic representation, more than «mimetic», fulfills the imperatives attributed to the modern form of political – Western representative democracy. The evidence of the necessary replacement of the «center of political ontology» from the sovereign to an «empty place» is demonstrated.Conclusions. Representative democracy, romantic and postmodern, is a necessary and legitimate form of the modern liberal way of representing the political. The main task of aesthetic politics is supposed to ensure security: "keep to the middle and avoid extremes", exclude an event, normalize the political, that is, to banalize politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信