在线和混合式翻转课堂中的评估回顾

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Divjak, Bart Rienties, Barbi Svetec, Petra Vondra, M. Žižak
{"title":"在线和混合式翻转课堂中的评估回顾","authors":"B. Divjak, Bart Rienties, Barbi Svetec, Petra Vondra, M. Žižak","doi":"10.53761/wfmhvt17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to investigate the guiding principles, practises, and challenges of assessment in online and blended flipped classroom (FC) approaches in higher education. Based on that, we proposed a generic model of teaching, learning and assessment in online and blended FC, including examples of teaching and learning activities, with corresponding levels of learning outcomes, and assessment tasks and methods. We synthesised the findings and suggested further research on the following aspects: peer-assessment and self-assessment; benefits and challenges of educational technology; ethical aspects of assessment and plagiarism; balance between flexibility and structure. We recommended that further research should put more focus on the utility, including validity and reliability of assessment and test the proposed generic model in different study fields and educational contexts. Our study was based on a systematic literature review, including 90 articles identified in the Web of Science database, with 23 studied in detail.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing Assessment in Online and Blended Flipped Classroom\",\"authors\":\"B. Divjak, Bart Rienties, Barbi Svetec, Petra Vondra, M. Žižak\",\"doi\":\"10.53761/wfmhvt17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to investigate the guiding principles, practises, and challenges of assessment in online and blended flipped classroom (FC) approaches in higher education. Based on that, we proposed a generic model of teaching, learning and assessment in online and blended FC, including examples of teaching and learning activities, with corresponding levels of learning outcomes, and assessment tasks and methods. We synthesised the findings and suggested further research on the following aspects: peer-assessment and self-assessment; benefits and challenges of educational technology; ethical aspects of assessment and plagiarism; balance between flexibility and structure. We recommended that further research should put more focus on the utility, including validity and reliability of assessment and test the proposed generic model in different study fields and educational contexts. Our study was based on a systematic literature review, including 90 articles identified in the Web of Science database, with 23 studied in detail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53761/wfmhvt17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/wfmhvt17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨高等教育中在线和混合式翻转课堂(FC)评估的指导原则、实践和挑战。在此基础上,我们提出了一个在线和混合式翻转课堂教学、学习和评估的通用模型,包括教学和学习活动的示例,以及相应的学习成果水平、评估任务和方法。我们对研究结果进行了总结,并建议就以下方面开展进一步研究:同伴评价和自我评价;教育技术的益处和挑战;评价和剽窃的伦理问题;灵活性和结构性之间的平衡。我们建议,进一步的研究应更多地关注评估的效用,包括评估的有效性和可靠性,并在不同的学习领域和教育背景下测试所提出的通用模式。我们的研究基于系统的文献综述,包括在 Web of Science 数据库中找到的 90 篇文章,其中 23 篇进行了详细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing Assessment in Online and Blended Flipped Classroom
The aim of this study was to investigate the guiding principles, practises, and challenges of assessment in online and blended flipped classroom (FC) approaches in higher education. Based on that, we proposed a generic model of teaching, learning and assessment in online and blended FC, including examples of teaching and learning activities, with corresponding levels of learning outcomes, and assessment tasks and methods. We synthesised the findings and suggested further research on the following aspects: peer-assessment and self-assessment; benefits and challenges of educational technology; ethical aspects of assessment and plagiarism; balance between flexibility and structure. We recommended that further research should put more focus on the utility, including validity and reliability of assessment and test the proposed generic model in different study fields and educational contexts. Our study was based on a systematic literature review, including 90 articles identified in the Web of Science database, with 23 studied in detail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信