法学理论中的惩罚报应主义

Luís Miguel Rechiki Meirelles
{"title":"法学理论中的惩罚报应主义","authors":"Luís Miguel Rechiki Meirelles","doi":"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p265-282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to analyze the Kantian response to the problem of punishment. Such a problem consists of how we can justify the application of a reprobative retributive damage to a transgressive agent by the State. To this end, I will focus on the work Metaphysics of customs and some commentator texts on the work and the subject. The analysis aims to highlight the contribution made by Kant to the problem of the justification of punishment, in addition to assessing the positive and negative points of considering the philosopher's response. At first, the problem of punishment will be exposed, followed by the justification proposal presented by Kant. In the third part of the study, we will highlight some positive points found in the Kantian proposal followed, evidently, by the highlight of the negative points of this proposal. In conclusion, the philosopher seems to present important concepts that, I understand, must be considered by contemporary responses to the problem of punishment.","PeriodicalId":145419,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","volume":"25 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O retributivismo da punição na Doutrina do Direito\",\"authors\":\"Luís Miguel Rechiki Meirelles\",\"doi\":\"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p265-282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aims to analyze the Kantian response to the problem of punishment. Such a problem consists of how we can justify the application of a reprobative retributive damage to a transgressive agent by the State. To this end, I will focus on the work Metaphysics of customs and some commentator texts on the work and the subject. The analysis aims to highlight the contribution made by Kant to the problem of the justification of punishment, in addition to assessing the positive and negative points of considering the philosopher's response. At first, the problem of punishment will be exposed, followed by the justification proposal presented by Kant. In the third part of the study, we will highlight some positive points found in the Kantian proposal followed, evidently, by the highlight of the negative points of this proposal. In conclusion, the philosopher seems to present important concepts that, I understand, must be considered by contemporary responses to the problem of punishment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"volume\":\"25 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p265-282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p265-282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析康德对惩罚问题的回应。这个问题包括我们如何证明国家对违法者实施惩罚性报应损害是正当的。为此,我将重点研究《习俗形而上学》这部著作以及一些关于这部著作和这一主题的评论文本。分析的目的在于强调康德在惩罚的正当性问题上所做的贡献,并对考虑这位哲学家的回应的正反两方面进行评估。首先,将揭示惩罚问题,然后是康德提出的正当化建议。在研究的第三部分,我们将强调康德建议中的一些积极观点,然后再强调该建议的消极观点。总之,这位哲学家似乎提出了一些重要的概念,我认为这些概念是当代应对惩罚问题时必须考虑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O retributivismo da punição na Doutrina do Direito
The present study aims to analyze the Kantian response to the problem of punishment. Such a problem consists of how we can justify the application of a reprobative retributive damage to a transgressive agent by the State. To this end, I will focus on the work Metaphysics of customs and some commentator texts on the work and the subject. The analysis aims to highlight the contribution made by Kant to the problem of the justification of punishment, in addition to assessing the positive and negative points of considering the philosopher's response. At first, the problem of punishment will be exposed, followed by the justification proposal presented by Kant. In the third part of the study, we will highlight some positive points found in the Kantian proposal followed, evidently, by the highlight of the negative points of this proposal. In conclusion, the philosopher seems to present important concepts that, I understand, must be considered by contemporary responses to the problem of punishment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信