A. C. Ogunlayi, V. Ekundina, Adedapo O. Kehinde, Linus A. Enye, Adegoke O. Aremu
{"title":"评估癌前病变和恶性前列腺组织中 P63、PSA 和 BCL-2 蛋白对诊断的影响","authors":"A. C. Ogunlayi, V. Ekundina, Adedapo O. Kehinde, Linus A. Enye, Adegoke O. Aremu","doi":"10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20241315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prostate cancer (CaP) is increasingly becoming a major health issue affecting men as cancer-related fatalities are attributable to the condition. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic criteria can help in gene-targeted therapy and help reduce its prevalence. This study is to assess the diagnostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), P63 and BCL-2 antibodies in CaP.\nMethod: A case-controlled retrospective study was carried out on eighty (80) prostrate tissue blocks retrieved from the pathology archive of Ekiti State university teaching hospital Ado Ekiti. IHC analysis of the selected antibodies was carried out and also stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H and E) for second opinion and confirmation.\nResults: The study showed that all the CaP samples had 100% positivity with varying reactivity to the IHC biomarkers; PSA had 100% positivity and MPR of 94% due to its multiple weaknesses as a biomarker p63 is a basal cells marker.\nConclusions: The expressions of these antibodies were observed in the progression of CaP. Although these markers are useful in predicting the progression from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to CaP, none of them can be utilised in isolation to a conclusion. Hence, they should be used in conjunction with one another to make up for their limitations. The immunohistochemical markers are beneficial in CaP diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":14297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","volume":"28 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the diagnostic impact of P63, PSA and BCL-2 proteins in premalignant and malignant prostate tissues\",\"authors\":\"A. C. Ogunlayi, V. Ekundina, Adedapo O. Kehinde, Linus A. Enye, Adegoke O. Aremu\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20241315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Prostate cancer (CaP) is increasingly becoming a major health issue affecting men as cancer-related fatalities are attributable to the condition. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic criteria can help in gene-targeted therapy and help reduce its prevalence. This study is to assess the diagnostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), P63 and BCL-2 antibodies in CaP.\\nMethod: A case-controlled retrospective study was carried out on eighty (80) prostrate tissue blocks retrieved from the pathology archive of Ekiti State university teaching hospital Ado Ekiti. IHC analysis of the selected antibodies was carried out and also stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H and E) for second opinion and confirmation.\\nResults: The study showed that all the CaP samples had 100% positivity with varying reactivity to the IHC biomarkers; PSA had 100% positivity and MPR of 94% due to its multiple weaknesses as a biomarker p63 is a basal cells marker.\\nConclusions: The expressions of these antibodies were observed in the progression of CaP. Although these markers are useful in predicting the progression from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to CaP, none of them can be utilised in isolation to a conclusion. Hence, they should be used in conjunction with one another to make up for their limitations. The immunohistochemical markers are beneficial in CaP diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"28 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20241315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20241315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:前列腺癌(CaP)正日益成为影响男性健康的一个主要问题,因为与癌症相关的死亡都是由前列腺癌引起的。免疫组化(IHC)诊断标准有助于基因靶向治疗,并有助于降低其发病率。本研究旨在评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、P63 和 BCL-2 抗体对 CaP 的诊断影响:方法:对从埃基提州立大学阿多埃基提教学医院病理档案中提取的八(80)个前列腺组织块进行了病例对照回顾性研究。对所选抗体进行了 IHC 分析,并用血红素和伊红(H 和 E)染色,以进行第二意见和确认:研究结果表明,所有 CaP 样本的阳性率均为 100%,但对 IHC 生物标记物的反应性各不相同;PSA 的阳性率为 100%,由于其作为生物标记物的多重弱点,其 MPR 为 94%;P63 是一种基底细胞标记物:结论:在CaP的进展过程中观察到了这些抗体的表达。尽管这些标记物有助于预测良性前列腺增生症(BPH)向钙化性前列腺增生症(CaP)的进展,但它们都不能单独用于得出结论。因此,它们应结合使用,以弥补其局限性。免疫组化标记物有助于 CaP 的诊断。
Assessing the diagnostic impact of P63, PSA and BCL-2 proteins in premalignant and malignant prostate tissues
Background: Prostate cancer (CaP) is increasingly becoming a major health issue affecting men as cancer-related fatalities are attributable to the condition. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic criteria can help in gene-targeted therapy and help reduce its prevalence. This study is to assess the diagnostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), P63 and BCL-2 antibodies in CaP.
Method: A case-controlled retrospective study was carried out on eighty (80) prostrate tissue blocks retrieved from the pathology archive of Ekiti State university teaching hospital Ado Ekiti. IHC analysis of the selected antibodies was carried out and also stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H and E) for second opinion and confirmation.
Results: The study showed that all the CaP samples had 100% positivity with varying reactivity to the IHC biomarkers; PSA had 100% positivity and MPR of 94% due to its multiple weaknesses as a biomarker p63 is a basal cells marker.
Conclusions: The expressions of these antibodies were observed in the progression of CaP. Although these markers are useful in predicting the progression from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to CaP, none of them can be utilised in isolation to a conclusion. Hence, they should be used in conjunction with one another to make up for their limitations. The immunohistochemical markers are beneficial in CaP diagnosis.