在编程课程中使用双轨练习分割法营造激励环境

Sine Zambach
{"title":"在编程课程中使用双轨练习分割法营造激励环境","authors":"Sine Zambach","doi":"10.7146/dut.v19i36.140251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nIn our society, programming and IT literacy are important skills. However, in introductory courses in higher education, there is a struggle to design the coursework in a way that engages and motivates both beginners and people who already know some code.\nThis paper presents a case study that explores the design of optional exercise sessions as a shorter 'fast track' for experienced or well-prepared students, and a longer 'normal track' for those who need help with the technical parts of the coursework. The case is analysed using self-determination theory to investigate student motivation in such a design.\nStudents perform well and are generally happy to be able to choose between tracks to find their own fit. Whether a 2-day induction workshop or a track split leads to the best learning environment is a question for future research.","PeriodicalId":171457,"journal":{"name":"Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating a motivating environment in a programming course using a two-track exercise split\",\"authors\":\"Sine Zambach\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/dut.v19i36.140251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract\\nIn our society, programming and IT literacy are important skills. However, in introductory courses in higher education, there is a struggle to design the coursework in a way that engages and motivates both beginners and people who already know some code.\\nThis paper presents a case study that explores the design of optional exercise sessions as a shorter 'fast track' for experienced or well-prepared students, and a longer 'normal track' for those who need help with the technical parts of the coursework. The case is analysed using self-determination theory to investigate student motivation in such a design.\\nStudents perform well and are generally happy to be able to choose between tracks to find their own fit. Whether a 2-day induction workshop or a track split leads to the best learning environment is a question for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v19i36.140251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v19i36.140251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在我们的社会中,编程和信息技术素养是重要的技能。本文介绍了一个案例研究,探讨了如何设计选修练习课程,为有经验或准备充分的学生提供较短的 "快速通道",为那些在课程作业的技术部分需要帮助的学生提供较长的 "正常通道"。我们运用自我决定理论对该案例进行了分析,以研究学生在这种设计中的学习动机。学生表现良好,并且普遍乐于在不同的轨道之间进行选择,以找到适合自己的轨道。为期 2 天的入门讲习班或分轨教学是否会带来最佳的学习环境,是今后研究的一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating a motivating environment in a programming course using a two-track exercise split
Abstract In our society, programming and IT literacy are important skills. However, in introductory courses in higher education, there is a struggle to design the coursework in a way that engages and motivates both beginners and people who already know some code. This paper presents a case study that explores the design of optional exercise sessions as a shorter 'fast track' for experienced or well-prepared students, and a longer 'normal track' for those who need help with the technical parts of the coursework. The case is analysed using self-determination theory to investigate student motivation in such a design. Students perform well and are generally happy to be able to choose between tracks to find their own fit. Whether a 2-day induction workshop or a track split leads to the best learning environment is a question for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信