Ram N. Acharya, Sushil C. Sapkota, Pratima Bhandari, Carlos Armijo, Derek Whitelock
{"title":"美国使用锯式、传统罗拉式和高速罗拉式轧棉机轧棉的相对成本","authors":"Ram N. Acharya, Sushil C. Sapkota, Pratima Bhandari, Carlos Armijo, Derek Whitelock","doi":"10.1002/agr.21946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether the cost of processing cotton using high‐speed roller gins is comparable to saw gins. The results from a “true” random effect model estimated using proprietary data voluntarily shared by cotton gins operating in Arizona and California showed that the average cost inefficiency for the sample gins analyzed in this study was 13.5%. Moreover, the cost of ginning using conventional roller gins and high‐speed roller gins was 24.42% and 14.18% higher than saw gins, respectively, and roller ginning costs were 10% lower for high‐speed roller gins than conventional roller gins. [EconLit Citations: D24; O14; Q16].","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative cost of ginning cotton using saw, conventional roller, and high‐speed roller gins in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Ram N. Acharya, Sushil C. Sapkota, Pratima Bhandari, Carlos Armijo, Derek Whitelock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agr.21946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether the cost of processing cotton using high‐speed roller gins is comparable to saw gins. The results from a “true” random effect model estimated using proprietary data voluntarily shared by cotton gins operating in Arizona and California showed that the average cost inefficiency for the sample gins analyzed in this study was 13.5%. Moreover, the cost of ginning using conventional roller gins and high‐speed roller gins was 24.42% and 14.18% higher than saw gins, respectively, and roller ginning costs were 10% lower for high‐speed roller gins than conventional roller gins. [EconLit Citations: D24; O14; Q16].\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"23 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relative cost of ginning cotton using saw, conventional roller, and high‐speed roller gins in the United States
The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether the cost of processing cotton using high‐speed roller gins is comparable to saw gins. The results from a “true” random effect model estimated using proprietary data voluntarily shared by cotton gins operating in Arizona and California showed that the average cost inefficiency for the sample gins analyzed in this study was 13.5%. Moreover, the cost of ginning using conventional roller gins and high‐speed roller gins was 24.42% and 14.18% higher than saw gins, respectively, and roller ginning costs were 10% lower for high‐speed roller gins than conventional roller gins. [EconLit Citations: D24; O14; Q16].