关于阿多诺与南方认识论之间关系的一些说明

Gustavo Ruiz da Silva, Daniel Lopes Prado Matheus
{"title":"关于阿多诺与南方认识论之间关系的一些说明","authors":"Gustavo Ruiz da Silva, Daniel Lopes Prado Matheus","doi":"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p225-248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to develop an understanding of how the culture industry still operates in the postcolonial era. To this end, the first part of this paper will look at Adorno and Horkheimer’s reading of modernity, touching on how instrumental reasoning can lend itself to barbarism, along with an exposition of Adorno’s analysis of the culture industry. The second part will present decolonial theory, its critique of European modernity and, particularly, its focus on neo-imperialism. This theory will then be put alongside critical theory, analyzing their differences concerning racial issues and how their critique of capitalism may represent a meeting point between the two theories. Finally, the conclusion will consider all previous elements to explain the connection between the Culture industry and its current strategy in former colonial areas.","PeriodicalId":145419,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","volume":"42 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algumas notas sobre a relação entre Adorno e a Epistemologia do Sul\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Ruiz da Silva, Daniel Lopes Prado Matheus\",\"doi\":\"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p225-248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to develop an understanding of how the culture industry still operates in the postcolonial era. To this end, the first part of this paper will look at Adorno and Horkheimer’s reading of modernity, touching on how instrumental reasoning can lend itself to barbarism, along with an exposition of Adorno’s analysis of the culture industry. The second part will present decolonial theory, its critique of European modernity and, particularly, its focus on neo-imperialism. This theory will then be put alongside critical theory, analyzing their differences concerning racial issues and how their critique of capitalism may represent a meeting point between the two theories. Finally, the conclusion will consider all previous elements to explain the connection between the Culture industry and its current strategy in former colonial areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"volume\":\"42 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p225-248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n2.p225-248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在了解文化产业在后殖民时代是如何运作的。为此,本文第一部分将探讨阿多诺和霍克海默对现代性的解读,触及工具理性如何导致野蛮主义,并阐述阿多诺对文化产业的分析。第二部分将介绍非殖民主义理论及其对欧洲现代性的批判,尤其是对新帝国主义的关注。然后,将把这一理论与批判理论放在一起,分析它们在种族问题上的差异,以及它们对资本主义的批判如何成为两种理论的交汇点。最后,结论将考虑之前的所有要素,以解释文化产业与其当前在前殖民地地区的战略之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algumas notas sobre a relação entre Adorno e a Epistemologia do Sul
This paper aims to develop an understanding of how the culture industry still operates in the postcolonial era. To this end, the first part of this paper will look at Adorno and Horkheimer’s reading of modernity, touching on how instrumental reasoning can lend itself to barbarism, along with an exposition of Adorno’s analysis of the culture industry. The second part will present decolonial theory, its critique of European modernity and, particularly, its focus on neo-imperialism. This theory will then be put alongside critical theory, analyzing their differences concerning racial issues and how their critique of capitalism may represent a meeting point between the two theories. Finally, the conclusion will consider all previous elements to explain the connection between the Culture industry and its current strategy in former colonial areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信