基于多选圆锥目标编程模型的网络数据包络分析

Derya Deliktaş, O. Ustun, Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş, Rifat Aykut Arapoglu
{"title":"基于多选圆锥目标编程模型的网络数据包络分析","authors":"Derya Deliktaş, O. Ustun, Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş, Rifat Aykut Arapoglu","doi":"10.1051/ro/2024117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In multi-stage processes, classical Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) acts like a black box and measures the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) without considering the internal structure of the system. Unlike classical DEA, recent studies have shown that the overall system efficiency scores are more meaningful if researched using the Network DEA (NDEA) methodology. NDEA performs simultaneous efficiency evaluations of sub-processes and the entire system. Recently, the composition method integrated with multi-objective programming (MOP) has been preferred by many authors to alleviate the drawbacks of earlier methods such as decomposition, slack-based measure (SBM) and the system-centric approach. This study proposes a novel approach incorporating Multi-Choice Conic Goal Programming into the NDEA (MCCGP-NDEA). It provides a more accurate representation of the Pareto front by revealing potential Pareto optimal solutions which are overlooked by the composition methods. Due to its ability to modify stage weights based on the decision makers' (DMs) preferences, it is likely to gather more samples from the Pareto surface. Computational results on available benchmark problems confirm that the proposed MCCGP-NDEA is a viable alternative to existing methods.","PeriodicalId":506995,"journal":{"name":"RAIRO - Operations Research","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-choice conic goal programming model-based network data envelopment analysis\",\"authors\":\"Derya Deliktaş, O. Ustun, Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş, Rifat Aykut Arapoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ro/2024117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In multi-stage processes, classical Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) acts like a black box and measures the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) without considering the internal structure of the system. Unlike classical DEA, recent studies have shown that the overall system efficiency scores are more meaningful if researched using the Network DEA (NDEA) methodology. NDEA performs simultaneous efficiency evaluations of sub-processes and the entire system. Recently, the composition method integrated with multi-objective programming (MOP) has been preferred by many authors to alleviate the drawbacks of earlier methods such as decomposition, slack-based measure (SBM) and the system-centric approach. This study proposes a novel approach incorporating Multi-Choice Conic Goal Programming into the NDEA (MCCGP-NDEA). It provides a more accurate representation of the Pareto front by revealing potential Pareto optimal solutions which are overlooked by the composition methods. Due to its ability to modify stage weights based on the decision makers' (DMs) preferences, it is likely to gather more samples from the Pareto surface. Computational results on available benchmark problems confirm that the proposed MCCGP-NDEA is a viable alternative to existing methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAIRO - Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAIRO - Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAIRO - Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多阶段过程中,传统的数据包络分析法(DEA)就像一个黑箱,只衡量决策单元(DMU)的效率,而不考虑系统的内部结构。与传统的数据包络分析不同,最近的研究表明,如果使用网络数据包络分析(NDEA)方法进行研究,整个系统的效率得分会更有意义。NDEA 同时对子流程和整个系统进行效率评估。最近,许多学者倾向于采用与多目标程序设计(MOP)相结合的组合方法,以减轻早期方法(如分解法、基于松弛的测量法(SBM)和以系统为中心的方法)的缺点。本研究提出了一种新方法,即在 NDEA(MCCGP-NDEA)中加入多选择圆锥目标编程法(Multi-Choice Conic Goal Programming)。该方法揭示了组成方法所忽略的潜在帕累托最优解,从而更准确地表示帕累托前沿。由于它能根据决策者(DMs)的偏好修改阶段权重,因此有可能从帕累托面收集到更多样本。对现有基准问题的计算结果证实,所提出的 MCCGP-NDEA 是现有方法的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-choice conic goal programming model-based network data envelopment analysis
In multi-stage processes, classical Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) acts like a black box and measures the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) without considering the internal structure of the system. Unlike classical DEA, recent studies have shown that the overall system efficiency scores are more meaningful if researched using the Network DEA (NDEA) methodology. NDEA performs simultaneous efficiency evaluations of sub-processes and the entire system. Recently, the composition method integrated with multi-objective programming (MOP) has been preferred by many authors to alleviate the drawbacks of earlier methods such as decomposition, slack-based measure (SBM) and the system-centric approach. This study proposes a novel approach incorporating Multi-Choice Conic Goal Programming into the NDEA (MCCGP-NDEA). It provides a more accurate representation of the Pareto front by revealing potential Pareto optimal solutions which are overlooked by the composition methods. Due to its ability to modify stage weights based on the decision makers' (DMs) preferences, it is likely to gather more samples from the Pareto surface. Computational results on available benchmark problems confirm that the proposed MCCGP-NDEA is a viable alternative to existing methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信