验证初发精神病青少年患者的认知筛查:CogScreen 协议。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Early Intervention in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1111/eip.13558
Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott
{"title":"验证初发精神病青少年患者的认知筛查:CogScreen 协议。","authors":"Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.13558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e13558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating cognitive screening in young people with first-episode psychosis: The CogScreen protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13558\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:认知障碍是首发精神病(FEP)的核心特征,也是预测长期社会心理功能的最有力因素之一。认知能力的评估和治疗应作为 FEP 常规临床护理的一部分。认知筛查为快速识别和分流最需要认知支持的患者提供了机会。然而,目前还没有针对 FEP 青少年的有效筛查方法。CogScreen 是一项效果-实施混合研究,旨在评估两种认知筛查工具在 FEP 青少年中的分类准确性(相对于作为参考标准的神经心理评估)、重测可靠性和可接受性:参与者将是在澳大利亚三个大城市(阿德莱德、悉尼和墨尔本)的FEP初级和专业治疗中心就诊的350名青少年(12-25岁)。所有参与者将在两个疗程内完成横断面评估,包括两种认知筛查工具(精神病学认知障碍筛查和蒙特利尔认知评估)、综合神经心理学评估、精神病学和神经发育评估以及其他辅助临床测量。为了确定认知筛查工具的重测可靠性,120 名参与者中的一个子集将在两周后重复筛查措施:结果:介绍了 CogScreen 的方案、原理和假设:结论:CogScreen 将为两种认知筛查工具与综合神经心理学评估的有效性和可靠性提供经验证据。这些筛查措施日后可用于临床实践,以帮助快速识别和治疗患有先天性聋哑的青少年常见的认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating cognitive screening in young people with first-episode psychosis: The CogScreen protocol.

Aim: Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.

Methods: Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.

Results: The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.

Conclusions: CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信