Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott
{"title":"验证初发精神病青少年患者的认知筛查:CogScreen 协议。","authors":"Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.13558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e13558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating cognitive screening in young people with first-episode psychosis: The CogScreen protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Audrey Rattray, Allie Pert, Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Debbie Anderson, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Nicholas Cheng, Scott Clark, Caroline Crlenjak, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Candice Jensen, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13558\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validating cognitive screening in young people with first-episode psychosis: The CogScreen protocol.
Aim: Cognitive impairments are a core feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and one of the strongest predictors of long-term psychosocial functioning. Cognition should be assessed and treated as part of routine clinical care for FEP. Cognitive screening offers the opportunity to rapidly identify and triage those in most need of cognitive support. However, there are currently no validated screening measures for young people with FEP. CogScreen is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study which aims to evaluate the classification accuracy (relative to a neuropsychological assessment as a reference standard), test-retest reliability and acceptability of two cognitive screening tools in young people with FEP.
Methods: Participants will be 350 young people (aged 12-25) attending primary and specialist FEP treatment centres in three large metropolitan cities (Adelaide, Sydney, and Melbourne) in Australia. All participants will complete a cross-sectional assessment over two sessions including two cognitive screening tools (Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery, psychiatric and neurodevelopmental assessments, and other supplementary clinical measures. To determine the test-retest reliability of the cognitive screening tools, a subset of 120 participants will repeat the screening measures two weeks later.
Results: The protocol, rationale, and hypotheses for CogScreen are presented.
Conclusions: CogScreen will provide empirical evidence for the validity and reliability of two cognitive screening tools when compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The screening measures may later be incorporated into clinical practice to assist with rapid identification and treatment of cognitive deficits commonly experienced by young people with FEP.
期刊介绍:
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.