Arnau Llauradó, Manuel Quintana, Margarita Gratacós-Viñola, Jose Manuel Vidal-Taboada, Juan Luis Restrepo-Vera, José Alemañ, Verónica López-Diego, Maria Salvadó, Daniel Sanchez-Tejerina, Javier Sotoca, Núria Raguer, Raul Juntas-Morales
{"title":"慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性脊髓神经病的步态评估","authors":"Arnau Llauradó, Manuel Quintana, Margarita Gratacós-Viñola, Jose Manuel Vidal-Taboada, Juan Luis Restrepo-Vera, José Alemañ, Verónica López-Diego, Maria Salvadó, Daniel Sanchez-Tejerina, Javier Sotoca, Núria Raguer, Raul Juntas-Morales","doi":"10.1155/2024/7037704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Background and Aims</i>. Gait impairment is a common manifestation of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). However, clinicians lack an effective monitoring tool, as no gait test has been validated for CIDP. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of three tests in monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP: Timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and 30-Second Chair Stand (30SCS). <i>Methods</i>. This is a prospective, single-center observational study. We included newly diagnosed CIDP patients starting treatment or relapsed CIDP patients requiring new treatment. We monitored the clinical course using CIDP-validated clinical scales and correlated changes in clinical status with the results of the gait tests. A ROC curve was developed, and we chose the cut-off point on each scale with the best specificity and sensitivity to detect change in clinical status. <i>Results</i>. A total of 20 patients have been recruited. The 3 tests show a statistical correlation with objective clinical improvement. In patients who have showed clinical improvement during the follow-up examination, a mean reduction of 4.8 seconds in TUG and 2.6 in 10MWT and a gain of 3 repetitions in 30SCS have been observed. The optimal cut-off points for each test were TUG ≤ 1 seconds, 10MWT ≤ 1 seconds, and 30SCS ≥ 1 repetition. The TUG test has the highest sensitivity (82.6%), and the 30SCS test has the highest specificity (100%) for detecting clinical improvement. <i>Conclusions</i>. The study found that the TUG and 30SCS tests could become effective tools for monitoring treatment response in CIDP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait Assessment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy\",\"authors\":\"Arnau Llauradó, Manuel Quintana, Margarita Gratacós-Viñola, Jose Manuel Vidal-Taboada, Juan Luis Restrepo-Vera, José Alemañ, Verónica López-Diego, Maria Salvadó, Daniel Sanchez-Tejerina, Javier Sotoca, Núria Raguer, Raul Juntas-Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7037704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Background and Aims</i>. Gait impairment is a common manifestation of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). However, clinicians lack an effective monitoring tool, as no gait test has been validated for CIDP. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of three tests in monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP: Timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and 30-Second Chair Stand (30SCS). <i>Methods</i>. This is a prospective, single-center observational study. We included newly diagnosed CIDP patients starting treatment or relapsed CIDP patients requiring new treatment. We monitored the clinical course using CIDP-validated clinical scales and correlated changes in clinical status with the results of the gait tests. A ROC curve was developed, and we chose the cut-off point on each scale with the best specificity and sensitivity to detect change in clinical status. <i>Results</i>. A total of 20 patients have been recruited. The 3 tests show a statistical correlation with objective clinical improvement. In patients who have showed clinical improvement during the follow-up examination, a mean reduction of 4.8 seconds in TUG and 2.6 in 10MWT and a gain of 3 repetitions in 30SCS have been observed. The optimal cut-off points for each test were TUG ≤ 1 seconds, 10MWT ≤ 1 seconds, and 30SCS ≥ 1 repetition. The TUG test has the highest sensitivity (82.6%), and the 30SCS test has the highest specificity (100%) for detecting clinical improvement. <i>Conclusions</i>. The study found that the TUG and 30SCS tests could become effective tools for monitoring treatment response in CIDP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7037704\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7037704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gait Assessment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Background and Aims. Gait impairment is a common manifestation of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). However, clinicians lack an effective monitoring tool, as no gait test has been validated for CIDP. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of three tests in monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP: Timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and 30-Second Chair Stand (30SCS). Methods. This is a prospective, single-center observational study. We included newly diagnosed CIDP patients starting treatment or relapsed CIDP patients requiring new treatment. We monitored the clinical course using CIDP-validated clinical scales and correlated changes in clinical status with the results of the gait tests. A ROC curve was developed, and we chose the cut-off point on each scale with the best specificity and sensitivity to detect change in clinical status. Results. A total of 20 patients have been recruited. The 3 tests show a statistical correlation with objective clinical improvement. In patients who have showed clinical improvement during the follow-up examination, a mean reduction of 4.8 seconds in TUG and 2.6 in 10MWT and a gain of 3 repetitions in 30SCS have been observed. The optimal cut-off points for each test were TUG ≤ 1 seconds, 10MWT ≤ 1 seconds, and 30SCS ≥ 1 repetition. The TUG test has the highest sensitivity (82.6%), and the 30SCS test has the highest specificity (100%) for detecting clinical improvement. Conclusions. The study found that the TUG and 30SCS tests could become effective tools for monitoring treatment response in CIDP patients.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.