对文化敏感的悲伤治疗和支持:范围审查

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anaïs Aeschlimann , Eva Heim , Clare Killikelly , Mariam Arafa , Andreas Maercker
{"title":"对文化敏感的悲伤治疗和支持:范围审查","authors":"Anaïs Aeschlimann ,&nbsp;Eva Heim ,&nbsp;Clare Killikelly ,&nbsp;Mariam Arafa ,&nbsp;Andreas Maercker","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this scoping review was to assess the scope and nature of evidence concerning culturally sensitive grief treatment and support interventions, aiming to provide valuable insights for future research on grief intervention development<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes, requires treatment. The norms of a person's culture influence grief expression, mourning rituals, and perspectives on death. Despite increasing interest in culturally sensitive grief interventions, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence is lacking. A scoping review was deemed fitting to address this gap.</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>This review included studies featuring participants experiencing clinically relevant grief and engaged in culturally sensitive psychosocial grief interventions. It included studies conducted in non-WEIRD contexts or those focusing on sociocultural (sub)groups distinct from the majority (in terms of age, religion, sexual orientation, etc).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following JBI methodology for scoping reviews, 13 databases were searched (Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PSYNDEX, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and Web of Science). Limits included language (English and German), peer-reviewed articles and publication date (from 2000). The two-step screening process (titles and abstracts, full text) was piloted, and data were extracted and collated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen studies were included, displaying diversity in geographical location, methodology, and target populations. Interventions targeted various forms of clinically relevant grief, lost relationships, and sociocultural groups. Cultural adaptation processes varied, with seven studies using a top-down approach. Sources of information for formative research involved theoretical models and empirical data, while local experts and qualitative research (e.g., key informant interviews) informed cultural adaptation. Outcome measures were diverse, with 15 studies showing significant pre-post intervention changes, while two did not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The review highlighted the emerging significance of culturally sensitive interventions for PGD, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches and further research. By shedding light on gaps and providing recommendations, it offers insights for future researchers in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000306/pdfft?md5=6ac29b3b3222905877b28f118a036664&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560324000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally sensitive grief treatment and support: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Anaïs Aeschlimann ,&nbsp;Eva Heim ,&nbsp;Clare Killikelly ,&nbsp;Mariam Arafa ,&nbsp;Andreas Maercker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this scoping review was to assess the scope and nature of evidence concerning culturally sensitive grief treatment and support interventions, aiming to provide valuable insights for future research on grief intervention development<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes, requires treatment. The norms of a person's culture influence grief expression, mourning rituals, and perspectives on death. Despite increasing interest in culturally sensitive grief interventions, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence is lacking. A scoping review was deemed fitting to address this gap.</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>This review included studies featuring participants experiencing clinically relevant grief and engaged in culturally sensitive psychosocial grief interventions. It included studies conducted in non-WEIRD contexts or those focusing on sociocultural (sub)groups distinct from the majority (in terms of age, religion, sexual orientation, etc).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following JBI methodology for scoping reviews, 13 databases were searched (Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PSYNDEX, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and Web of Science). Limits included language (English and German), peer-reviewed articles and publication date (from 2000). The two-step screening process (titles and abstracts, full text) was piloted, and data were extracted and collated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen studies were included, displaying diversity in geographical location, methodology, and target populations. Interventions targeted various forms of clinically relevant grief, lost relationships, and sociocultural groups. Cultural adaptation processes varied, with seven studies using a top-down approach. Sources of information for formative research involved theoretical models and empirical data, while local experts and qualitative research (e.g., key informant interviews) informed cultural adaptation. Outcome measures were diverse, with 15 studies showing significant pre-post intervention changes, while two did not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The review highlighted the emerging significance of culturally sensitive interventions for PGD, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches and further research. By shedding light on gaps and providing recommendations, it offers insights for future researchers in this field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000306/pdfft?md5=6ac29b3b3222905877b28f118a036664&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560324000306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在评估与文化敏感性悲伤治疗和支持干预措施相关的证据的范围和性质,旨在为未来悲伤干预措施的开发研究提供有价值的见解。一个人的文化规范会影响悲伤的表达、哀悼仪式和对死亡的看法。尽管人们对文化敏感的悲伤干预越来越感兴趣,但却缺乏全面的证据综述。纳入标准本综述纳入了以经历临床相关悲伤并参与文化敏感性社会心理悲伤干预的参与者为对象的研究。方法按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法,检索了 13 个数据库(Scopus、Embase、Cochrane、Sociological Abstracts、IBSS、PTSDpubs、PsycINFO、PsycArticles、PSYNDEX、MEDLINE、CINAHL、SocINDEX 和 Web of Science)。限制条件包括语言(英语和德语)、同行评审文章和出版日期(自 2000 年起)。对两步筛选过程(标题和摘要、全文)进行了试用,并对数据进行了提取和整理。结果共纳入了 18 项研究,这些研究在地理位置、方法和目标人群方面呈现出多样性。干预措施针对各种形式的临床相关悲伤、失去的关系和社会文化群体。文化适应过程各不相同,其中七项研究采用了自上而下的方法。形成性研究的信息来源包括理论模型和经验数据,而当地专家和定性研究(如关键信息提供者访谈)则为文化适应提供了信息。结果衡量标准多种多样,其中 15 项研究显示干预前后发生了显著变化,而两项研究则没有。通过揭示差距和提出建议,该综述为该领域未来的研究人员提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culturally sensitive grief treatment and support: A scoping review

Objective

The goal of this scoping review was to assess the scope and nature of evidence concerning culturally sensitive grief treatment and support interventions, aiming to provide valuable insights for future research on grief intervention development.

Introduction

Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes, requires treatment. The norms of a person's culture influence grief expression, mourning rituals, and perspectives on death. Despite increasing interest in culturally sensitive grief interventions, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence is lacking. A scoping review was deemed fitting to address this gap.

Inclusion criteria

This review included studies featuring participants experiencing clinically relevant grief and engaged in culturally sensitive psychosocial grief interventions. It included studies conducted in non-WEIRD contexts or those focusing on sociocultural (sub)groups distinct from the majority (in terms of age, religion, sexual orientation, etc).

Methods

Following JBI methodology for scoping reviews, 13 databases were searched (Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, PSYNDEX, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and Web of Science). Limits included language (English and German), peer-reviewed articles and publication date (from 2000). The two-step screening process (titles and abstracts, full text) was piloted, and data were extracted and collated.

Results

Eighteen studies were included, displaying diversity in geographical location, methodology, and target populations. Interventions targeted various forms of clinically relevant grief, lost relationships, and sociocultural groups. Cultural adaptation processes varied, with seven studies using a top-down approach. Sources of information for formative research involved theoretical models and empirical data, while local experts and qualitative research (e.g., key informant interviews) informed cultural adaptation. Outcome measures were diverse, with 15 studies showing significant pre-post intervention changes, while two did not.

Conclusions

The review highlighted the emerging significance of culturally sensitive interventions for PGD, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches and further research. By shedding light on gaps and providing recommendations, it offers insights for future researchers in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信