银行风险披露的实证研究:系统文献回顾、文献计量分析和未来研究议程

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Michael Mies
{"title":"银行风险披露的实证研究:系统文献回顾、文献计量分析和未来研究议程","authors":"Michael Mies","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to outline the current state of empirical research on banks' risk reporting. In addition to the development of the research field over time, regulatory trends and drivers for academic research on risk reporting will be derived. The review follows a triangulated approach: In addition to a qualitative content analysis based on the SLR, a quantitative bibliometric analysis using the scientific visualization techniques bibliometrix and VOSviewer will serve as a robustness check. The sole focus of this SLR on banks reflects the regulatory specificity of the financial services industry and serves to derive recommendations for action for regulators, supervisors, and auditors. The article follows the tenor of macro- and micro-prudential banking regulation, which has raised market discipline to a new level through the implementation of regulatory disclosure standards in the context of the Basel III amendment, with a deliberate clustering of the research area according to risk types. By identifying research gaps and conceptualizing a research agenda, this paper continues to serve the academia to broaden the research field of risk disclosure, especially for banks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 103357"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924002898/pdfft?md5=79daf58cb6649f00c2ab5f09b7fa94c8&pid=1-s2.0-S1057521924002898-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical research on banks' risk disclosure: Systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis and future research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Michael Mies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to outline the current state of empirical research on banks' risk reporting. In addition to the development of the research field over time, regulatory trends and drivers for academic research on risk reporting will be derived. The review follows a triangulated approach: In addition to a qualitative content analysis based on the SLR, a quantitative bibliometric analysis using the scientific visualization techniques bibliometrix and VOSviewer will serve as a robustness check. The sole focus of this SLR on banks reflects the regulatory specificity of the financial services industry and serves to derive recommendations for action for regulators, supervisors, and auditors. The article follows the tenor of macro- and micro-prudential banking regulation, which has raised market discipline to a new level through the implementation of regulatory disclosure standards in the context of the Basel III amendment, with a deliberate clustering of the research area according to risk types. By identifying research gaps and conceptualizing a research agenda, this paper continues to serve the academia to broaden the research field of risk disclosure, especially for banks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924002898/pdfft?md5=79daf58cb6649f00c2ab5f09b7fa94c8&pid=1-s2.0-S1057521924002898-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924002898\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924002898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在概述银行风险报告实证研究的现状。除了研究领域的长期发展外,还将得出监管趋势和风险报告学术研究的驱动力。本综述采用三角测量法:除了基于 SLR 的定性内容分析外,还将使用科学可视化技术 bibliometrix 和 VOSviewer 进行定量文献计量分析,作为稳健性检查。本 SLR 仅关注银行,这反映了金融服务业的监管特殊性,并为监管机构、监管人员和审计人员提供了行动建议。宏观和微观审慎银行监管通过在《巴塞尔协议 III》修正案的背景下实施监管披露标准,将市场纪律提升到了一个新的水平,本文紧跟宏观和微观审慎银行监管的主旋律,特意根据风险类型对研究领域进行了分组。通过确定研究空白和构思研究议程,本文将继续为学术界服务,以拓宽风险披露的研究领域,尤其是银行风险披露的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical research on banks' risk disclosure: Systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis and future research agenda

The purpose of this paper is to outline the current state of empirical research on banks' risk reporting. In addition to the development of the research field over time, regulatory trends and drivers for academic research on risk reporting will be derived. The review follows a triangulated approach: In addition to a qualitative content analysis based on the SLR, a quantitative bibliometric analysis using the scientific visualization techniques bibliometrix and VOSviewer will serve as a robustness check. The sole focus of this SLR on banks reflects the regulatory specificity of the financial services industry and serves to derive recommendations for action for regulators, supervisors, and auditors. The article follows the tenor of macro- and micro-prudential banking regulation, which has raised market discipline to a new level through the implementation of regulatory disclosure standards in the context of the Basel III amendment, with a deliberate clustering of the research area according to risk types. By identifying research gaps and conceptualizing a research agenda, this paper continues to serve the academia to broaden the research field of risk disclosure, especially for banks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信