复合楼板系统全尺寸结构防火测试的数值分析

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Chenzhi Ma, Thomas Gernay
{"title":"复合楼板系统全尺寸结构防火测试的数值分析","authors":"Chenzhi Ma,&nbsp;Thomas Gernay","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent experiments conducted at the NIST examined steel-concrete composite floor systems designed per U.S. practice under standard fire. The first experiment designed per prescriptive provisions for a 2-hour fire rating with 60 mm<sup>2</sup>/m of reinforcement, developed a central breach integrity failure after approximately one hour of exposure. The second and third experiments, designed with 230 mm<sup>2</sup>/m of reinforcement, with the third one omitting the fire protection on the central steel beam, showed no failure within 2 hours. This paper describes a numerical investigation to gain further insights into the fire behavior of the composite systems tested in these experiments. Nonlinear finite element models were validated against the tests. Simulation of the first test shows concrete damage and rebar fracture in the hogging moment area corresponding with the cracks observed experimentally. Simulation of the third test captures the development of tensile membrane action, confirming the redistribution from the unprotected secondary steel member to the floor reinforcing steel. A sensitivity analysis allows identifying the minimum reinforcement steel for protected and unprotected central beams configurations. The results can support improvements of the fire requirements in the U.S. codes as well as application of performance-based structural fire design for composite structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical analysis of full-scale structural fire tests on composite floor systems\",\"authors\":\"Chenzhi Ma,&nbsp;Thomas Gernay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent experiments conducted at the NIST examined steel-concrete composite floor systems designed per U.S. practice under standard fire. The first experiment designed per prescriptive provisions for a 2-hour fire rating with 60 mm<sup>2</sup>/m of reinforcement, developed a central breach integrity failure after approximately one hour of exposure. The second and third experiments, designed with 230 mm<sup>2</sup>/m of reinforcement, with the third one omitting the fire protection on the central steel beam, showed no failure within 2 hours. This paper describes a numerical investigation to gain further insights into the fire behavior of the composite systems tested in these experiments. Nonlinear finite element models were validated against the tests. Simulation of the first test shows concrete damage and rebar fracture in the hogging moment area corresponding with the cracks observed experimentally. Simulation of the third test captures the development of tensile membrane action, confirming the redistribution from the unprotected secondary steel member to the floor reinforcing steel. A sensitivity analysis allows identifying the minimum reinforcement steel for protected and unprotected central beams configurations. The results can support improvements of the fire requirements in the U.S. codes as well as application of performance-based structural fire design for composite structures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037971122400095X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037971122400095X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在 NIST 进行的实验检查了在标准火灾条件下按照美国惯例设计的钢-混凝土复合楼板系统。第一个实验按照 2 小时耐火等级的规范性规定设计,采用 60 mm2/m 的钢筋,在暴露约一小时后出现中心破损的完整性故障。第二项和第三项实验的设计配筋为 230 平方毫米/米,其中第三项实验省略了中央钢梁的防火保护措施,但在 2 小时内未出现任何故障。本文介绍了一项数值研究,旨在进一步了解这些实验中测试的复合材料系统的火灾行为。非线性有限元模型与试验进行了验证。第一次试验的模拟结果表明,与实验中观察到的裂缝相对应,阻力矩区域出现了混凝土损坏和钢筋断裂。第三次试验的模拟捕捉到了拉伸薄膜作用的发展,证实了从未受损伤的二级钢构件到楼板钢筋的重新分布。通过敏感性分析,可以确定受保护和非受保护中梁配置的最小钢筋。这些结果有助于改进美国规范中的防火要求,以及应用基于性能的复合结构防火设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical analysis of full-scale structural fire tests on composite floor systems

Recent experiments conducted at the NIST examined steel-concrete composite floor systems designed per U.S. practice under standard fire. The first experiment designed per prescriptive provisions for a 2-hour fire rating with 60 mm2/m of reinforcement, developed a central breach integrity failure after approximately one hour of exposure. The second and third experiments, designed with 230 mm2/m of reinforcement, with the third one omitting the fire protection on the central steel beam, showed no failure within 2 hours. This paper describes a numerical investigation to gain further insights into the fire behavior of the composite systems tested in these experiments. Nonlinear finite element models were validated against the tests. Simulation of the first test shows concrete damage and rebar fracture in the hogging moment area corresponding with the cracks observed experimentally. Simulation of the third test captures the development of tensile membrane action, confirming the redistribution from the unprotected secondary steel member to the floor reinforcing steel. A sensitivity analysis allows identifying the minimum reinforcement steel for protected and unprotected central beams configurations. The results can support improvements of the fire requirements in the U.S. codes as well as application of performance-based structural fire design for composite structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信