迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫的保留率:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Astrid Durez , Tom Theys , Johannes van Loon , Wim Van Paesschen
{"title":"迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫的保留率:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Astrid Durez ,&nbsp;Tom Theys ,&nbsp;Johannes van Loon ,&nbsp;Wim Van Paesschen","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this single-centre, retrospective, observational study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by using retention rate as a surrogate measure for seizure reduction. We included all patients with DRE, treated at the adult neurology department of the University Hospitals Leuven and who started VNS therapy from January 1, 1994, until May 1, 2021, with follow-up data cutoff on January 1, 2023. Retention rate of VNS was defined as the percentage of patients who maintain VNS at established time points. We estimated cumulative retention rate and battery replacement rate and correlated these with seizure reduction, using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical analysis of potential predictors of VNS outcome (age, sex and epilepsy duration at implantation) was performed using mono- and multivariate analyses. VNS was started in 110 patients with DRE, with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (SD 6.5). VNS was discontinued in 55 patients (50%), with ineffectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation (98%). The battery was replaced at least once in 42 patients (38%). Estimated retention rates were 70%, 52%, 45% and 33% after 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Estimated first battery replacement rates were 16%, 42% and 47% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Both estimates showed a statistically significant correlation with seizure reduction. No independent predictors of long-term outcome of VNS were found. This is the first long-term study using retention rate of VNS to assess effectiveness. VNS is a well-tolerated therapy, but retention rates decline with long follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000986/pdfft?md5=cd1c56dd24652243d1da00a23c936101&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000986-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retention rate of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-centre, retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Durez ,&nbsp;Tom Theys ,&nbsp;Johannes van Loon ,&nbsp;Wim Van Paesschen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this single-centre, retrospective, observational study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by using retention rate as a surrogate measure for seizure reduction. We included all patients with DRE, treated at the adult neurology department of the University Hospitals Leuven and who started VNS therapy from January 1, 1994, until May 1, 2021, with follow-up data cutoff on January 1, 2023. Retention rate of VNS was defined as the percentage of patients who maintain VNS at established time points. We estimated cumulative retention rate and battery replacement rate and correlated these with seizure reduction, using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical analysis of potential predictors of VNS outcome (age, sex and epilepsy duration at implantation) was performed using mono- and multivariate analyses. VNS was started in 110 patients with DRE, with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (SD 6.5). VNS was discontinued in 55 patients (50%), with ineffectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation (98%). The battery was replaced at least once in 42 patients (38%). Estimated retention rates were 70%, 52%, 45% and 33% after 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Estimated first battery replacement rates were 16%, 42% and 47% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Both estimates showed a statistically significant correlation with seizure reduction. No independent predictors of long-term outcome of VNS were found. This is the first long-term study using retention rate of VNS to assess effectiveness. VNS is a well-tolerated therapy, but retention rates decline with long follow-up.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000986/pdfft?md5=cd1c56dd24652243d1da00a23c936101&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000986-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究的目的是评估迷走神经刺激(VNS)治疗耐药性癫痫(DRE)的长期疗效,将保留率作为减少癫痫发作的替代指标。我们纳入了在鲁汶大学医院成人神经科接受治疗的所有 DRE 患者,他们从 1994 年 1 月 1 日开始接受 VNS 治疗,直至 2021 年 5 月 1 日,随访数据截止日期为 2023 年 1 月 1 日。VNS 的保留率定义为在既定时间点保留 VNS 的患者比例。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析法估算了累积保留率和电池更换率,并将其与癫痫发作减少率相关联。我们使用单变量和多变量分析对 VNS 结果的潜在预测因素(植入时的年龄、性别和癫痫持续时间)进行了统计分析。110 名 DRE 患者开始接受 VNS 治疗,平均随访 8.7 年(SD 6.5)。55 名患者(50%)停用了 VNS,无效是停用的主要原因(98%)。42 名患者(38%)至少更换过一次电池。估计 5 年、10 年、15 年和 20 年后的保留率分别为 70%、52%、45% 和 33%。估计首次电池更换率在 5 年、10 年和 15 年后分别为 16%、42% 和 47%。这两个估计值与癫痫发作减少率之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。没有发现 VNS 长期疗效的独立预测因素。这是第一项使用 VNS 的保留率来评估有效性的长期研究。VNS 是一种耐受性良好的疗法,但随访时间越长,保留率越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retention rate of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A single-centre, retrospective study.

The aim of this single-centre, retrospective, observational study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by using retention rate as a surrogate measure for seizure reduction. We included all patients with DRE, treated at the adult neurology department of the University Hospitals Leuven and who started VNS therapy from January 1, 1994, until May 1, 2021, with follow-up data cutoff on January 1, 2023. Retention rate of VNS was defined as the percentage of patients who maintain VNS at established time points. We estimated cumulative retention rate and battery replacement rate and correlated these with seizure reduction, using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical analysis of potential predictors of VNS outcome (age, sex and epilepsy duration at implantation) was performed using mono- and multivariate analyses. VNS was started in 110 patients with DRE, with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (SD 6.5). VNS was discontinued in 55 patients (50%), with ineffectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation (98%). The battery was replaced at least once in 42 patients (38%). Estimated retention rates were 70%, 52%, 45% and 33% after 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Estimated first battery replacement rates were 16%, 42% and 47% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Both estimates showed a statistically significant correlation with seizure reduction. No independent predictors of long-term outcome of VNS were found. This is the first long-term study using retention rate of VNS to assess effectiveness. VNS is a well-tolerated therapy, but retention rates decline with long follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信