基于不均匀沉降动态控制方法的倾斜过深沉箱变形特征的演变

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Fei Yu , Kaiwen Tong , Jian Li , Zhangjun Dai , Shanxiong Chen
{"title":"基于不均匀沉降动态控制方法的倾斜过深沉箱变形特征的演变","authors":"Fei Yu ,&nbsp;Kaiwen Tong ,&nbsp;Jian Li ,&nbsp;Zhangjun Dai ,&nbsp;Shanxiong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Taking a caisson foundation engineering of a railway across-river bridge as the case, the technical characteristics and key challenges of over-deep inclined caisson were described firstly. Subsequently, the main controlling factors of the uneven settlement were analyzed. In view of the difficulty in obtaining the parameters of disturbed grouting soil, as well as the large adjustment of subsequent construction loads, an uneven settlement method based on over-deep underwater lateral pressure test and high-pressure consolidation test was proposed. The proposed method was simulated by finite element method to analyze the variations of total settlement, differential settlement and inclined attitude of caisson foundation under different loading stages. The results showed that the difference in the thickness of the disturbed layer was the dominant factor of uneven settlement, finally controlling the inclination shape. Grouting reinforcement was conductive to improving the settlement of caisson foundation. The maximum total settlement, differential settlement and offset after reinforcement were reduced to 249.53 mm, 19.54 mm and 29.20 mm, respectively. The deformation mainly occurred in the loading stage before the platform construction, accounting for about 60 %. If it is considered to level the top surface, adjust the elevation and load center during the construction of platform, the incremental settlement, the north–south differential settlement and the offset of top surface corresponded to 94.26 mm, 10.31 mm and 17.52 mm, respectively. Finally, the reliability of above method was fully verified by comparing the measured data with calculated value. The results will provide certain ideas and methods for relevant engineering problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 101476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000544/pdfft?md5=c5526b0cb643b3178f8ce8ee9183c9c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000544-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of the deformation characteristics of an inclined over-deep caisson based on the dynamic control method of uneven settlement\",\"authors\":\"Fei Yu ,&nbsp;Kaiwen Tong ,&nbsp;Jian Li ,&nbsp;Zhangjun Dai ,&nbsp;Shanxiong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Taking a caisson foundation engineering of a railway across-river bridge as the case, the technical characteristics and key challenges of over-deep inclined caisson were described firstly. Subsequently, the main controlling factors of the uneven settlement were analyzed. In view of the difficulty in obtaining the parameters of disturbed grouting soil, as well as the large adjustment of subsequent construction loads, an uneven settlement method based on over-deep underwater lateral pressure test and high-pressure consolidation test was proposed. The proposed method was simulated by finite element method to analyze the variations of total settlement, differential settlement and inclined attitude of caisson foundation under different loading stages. The results showed that the difference in the thickness of the disturbed layer was the dominant factor of uneven settlement, finally controlling the inclination shape. Grouting reinforcement was conductive to improving the settlement of caisson foundation. The maximum total settlement, differential settlement and offset after reinforcement were reduced to 249.53 mm, 19.54 mm and 29.20 mm, respectively. The deformation mainly occurred in the loading stage before the platform construction, accounting for about 60 %. If it is considered to level the top surface, adjust the elevation and load center during the construction of platform, the incremental settlement, the north–south differential settlement and the offset of top surface corresponded to 94.26 mm, 10.31 mm and 17.52 mm, respectively. Finally, the reliability of above method was fully verified by comparing the measured data with calculated value. The results will provide certain ideas and methods for relevant engineering problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000544/pdfft?md5=c5526b0cb643b3178f8ce8ee9183c9c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000544-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000544\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以某铁路跨河大桥的沉箱基础工程为例,首先阐述了超深倾斜沉箱的技术特点和主要难题。随后,分析了不均匀沉降的主要控制因素。针对扰动灌浆土参数获取困难、后续施工荷载调整大等问题,提出了基于超深水下侧压试验和高压固结试验的不均匀沉降方法。利用有限元法对所提出的方法进行了模拟,分析了不同加载阶段下沉箱地基的总沉降量、差异沉降量和倾斜姿态的变化。结果表明,扰动层厚度的差异是造成不均匀沉降的主要因素,并最终控制了倾斜形状。灌浆加固有利于改善沉箱地基的沉降。加固后的最大总沉降量、差异沉降量和偏移量分别减少到 249.53 毫米、19.54 毫米和 29.20 毫米。变形主要发生在平台施工前的加载阶段,约占 60%。如果考虑在平台施工过程中平整顶面、调整标高和荷载中心,则顶面的增量沉降、南北差异沉降和偏移分别为 94.26 mm、10.31 mm 和 17.52 mm。最后,通过实测数据与计算值的对比,充分验证了上述方法的可靠性。这些结果将为相关工程问题的解决提供一定的思路和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of the deformation characteristics of an inclined over-deep caisson based on the dynamic control method of uneven settlement

Taking a caisson foundation engineering of a railway across-river bridge as the case, the technical characteristics and key challenges of over-deep inclined caisson were described firstly. Subsequently, the main controlling factors of the uneven settlement were analyzed. In view of the difficulty in obtaining the parameters of disturbed grouting soil, as well as the large adjustment of subsequent construction loads, an uneven settlement method based on over-deep underwater lateral pressure test and high-pressure consolidation test was proposed. The proposed method was simulated by finite element method to analyze the variations of total settlement, differential settlement and inclined attitude of caisson foundation under different loading stages. The results showed that the difference in the thickness of the disturbed layer was the dominant factor of uneven settlement, finally controlling the inclination shape. Grouting reinforcement was conductive to improving the settlement of caisson foundation. The maximum total settlement, differential settlement and offset after reinforcement were reduced to 249.53 mm, 19.54 mm and 29.20 mm, respectively. The deformation mainly occurred in the loading stage before the platform construction, accounting for about 60 %. If it is considered to level the top surface, adjust the elevation and load center during the construction of platform, the incremental settlement, the north–south differential settlement and the offset of top surface corresponded to 94.26 mm, 10.31 mm and 17.52 mm, respectively. Finally, the reliability of above method was fully verified by comparing the measured data with calculated value. The results will provide certain ideas and methods for relevant engineering problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信