加纳临床督导的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241255263
Sherrif Kwame Awiagah, Rebecca Dordunu, Nelson Hukporti, Promise Edem Nukunu, Gideon Dzando
{"title":"加纳临床督导的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。","authors":"Sherrif Kwame Awiagah, Rebecca Dordunu, Nelson Hukporti, Promise Edem Nukunu, Gideon Dzando","doi":"10.1177/23779608241255263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical supervision involves the professional relationship between an experienced and knowledgeable clinician and a less experienced clinician in which the experienced clinician provides support toward the skills development of the less experienced one. The concept, structure, and format of clinical supervision vary in various jurisdictions and is influenced by the availability of resources, the training needs of supervisees, and organizational structures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to explore, map out and synthesize the available literature on the facilitators and barriers to clinical supervision in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and modified by Levac et al. for scoping reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were used to ensure a coherent and transparent reporting of literature. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, and Google Scholar using key words and key terms. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2023, were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search across all the databases yielded 208 results. Two independent reviewers completed both the title and abstract, and full text screenings. A third reviewer helped to resolve all discrepancies that arose during the screening process. The review included 20 articles and generated four themes: clinical supervision as a collaborative effort, feedback mechanism, training and adaptation, and challenges with implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this review highlight that healthcare professionals in Ghana valued clinical supervision. However, the implementation of clinical supervision is faced with individual and systemic challenges. There is the need for on-going collaboration between educational and clinical institutions to develop modalities that promote clinical supervision in Ghana.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11113047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Supervision in Ghana: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sherrif Kwame Awiagah, Rebecca Dordunu, Nelson Hukporti, Promise Edem Nukunu, Gideon Dzando\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608241255263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical supervision involves the professional relationship between an experienced and knowledgeable clinician and a less experienced clinician in which the experienced clinician provides support toward the skills development of the less experienced one. The concept, structure, and format of clinical supervision vary in various jurisdictions and is influenced by the availability of resources, the training needs of supervisees, and organizational structures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to explore, map out and synthesize the available literature on the facilitators and barriers to clinical supervision in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and modified by Levac et al. for scoping reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were used to ensure a coherent and transparent reporting of literature. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, and Google Scholar using key words and key terms. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2023, were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search across all the databases yielded 208 results. Two independent reviewers completed both the title and abstract, and full text screenings. A third reviewer helped to resolve all discrepancies that arose during the screening process. The review included 20 articles and generated four themes: clinical supervision as a collaborative effort, feedback mechanism, training and adaptation, and challenges with implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this review highlight that healthcare professionals in Ghana valued clinical supervision. However, the implementation of clinical supervision is faced with individual and systemic challenges. There is the need for on-going collaboration between educational and clinical institutions to develop modalities that promote clinical supervision in Ghana.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11113047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241255263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241255263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床督导是指经验丰富、知识渊博的临床医生与经验较少的临床医生之间的专业关系,其中经验丰富的临床医生为经验较少的临床医生的技能发展提供支持。临床督导的概念、结构和形式在不同的司法管辖区各不相同,并受到资源可用性、被督导者的培训需求和组织结构的影响。目的:本范围综述的目的是探索、梳理和归纳有关加纳临床督导的促进因素和障碍的现有文献:方法:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 制定并经 Levac 等人修改的范围界定综述方法框架,以及范围界定综述的《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》扩展版,以确保文献报告的连贯性和透明度。使用关键词和关键术语在 PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、Medline 和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统检索。审查包括 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 28 日期间发表的文章:在所有数据库中的初步搜索结果为 208 条。两位独立审稿人完成了标题、摘要和全文的筛选。第三位审稿人帮助解决了筛选过程中出现的所有差异。综述包括 20 篇文章,并产生了四个主题:作为合作努力的临床督导、反馈机制、培训和适应,以及实施过程中的挑战:综述结果表明,加纳的医护人员重视临床督导。然而,临床督导的实施面临着个人和系统方面的挑战。教育机构和临床机构之间需要持续合作,以制定在加纳推广临床督导的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Supervision in Ghana: A Scoping Review.

Background: Clinical supervision involves the professional relationship between an experienced and knowledgeable clinician and a less experienced clinician in which the experienced clinician provides support toward the skills development of the less experienced one. The concept, structure, and format of clinical supervision vary in various jurisdictions and is influenced by the availability of resources, the training needs of supervisees, and organizational structures.

Aim: The aim of this scoping review was to explore, map out and synthesize the available literature on the facilitators and barriers to clinical supervision in Ghana.

Methods: The methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and modified by Levac et al. for scoping reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were used to ensure a coherent and transparent reporting of literature. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, and Google Scholar using key words and key terms. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2023, were included in the review.

Results: The initial search across all the databases yielded 208 results. Two independent reviewers completed both the title and abstract, and full text screenings. A third reviewer helped to resolve all discrepancies that arose during the screening process. The review included 20 articles and generated four themes: clinical supervision as a collaborative effort, feedback mechanism, training and adaptation, and challenges with implementation.

Conclusion: Findings from this review highlight that healthcare professionals in Ghana valued clinical supervision. However, the implementation of clinical supervision is faced with individual and systemic challenges. There is the need for on-going collaboration between educational and clinical institutions to develop modalities that promote clinical supervision in Ghana.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信