新技术可解决中风后遗症患者受影响手臂与非受影响手臂对测力计性能的影响问题。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Christen J Mendonca, Brandon L Kane, Kimberly A Smith, Sangeetha Mohanraj, Laurie A Malone, Mohanraj Thirumalai, James Rimmer, David A Brown
{"title":"新技术可解决中风后遗症患者受影响手臂与非受影响手臂对测力计性能的影响问题。","authors":"Christen J Mendonca, Brandon L Kane, Kimberly A Smith, Sangeetha Mohanraj, Laurie A Malone, Mohanraj Thirumalai, James Rimmer, David A Brown","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2356415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When pedaling a coupled-crank arm ergometer, individuals with hemiplegia may experience nonparetic arm overcompensation, and paretic arm resistance, due to neuromechanical deficits. Technologies that foster independent limb contributions may increase the effectiveness of exercise for people poststroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the speed during uncoupled pedaling with the Advanced Virtual Exercise Environment Device among individuals poststroke and non-impaired comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 2 groups:Poststroke and Comparison. Participants attended one lab session and performed peak speed tests and a graded exercise repeated for bilateral pedaling, unilateral (left, right).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one participants completed the protocol (16 women, 15 men). Poststroke participants pedaled slower during the bilateral speed test (64 ± 39 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001), and graded exercise, (54 ± 28 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) versus comparisons (141 ± 19, 104 ± 12 RPM). Poststroke individuals had lower peak RPM during the unilateral speed test with their paretic arm (70 ± 46 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) compared to their unilateral speed test (130 ± 37 RPM) and graded exercise (108 ± 25 RPM) with their nonparetic arm. Comparisons did not differ between arms during speed tests and graded exercise. Poststroke participants demonstrated lower peak speed with their affected arm during the bilateral speed test (52 ± 42 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) and graded exercise (49 ± 28 RPM, <i>p</i> = .008) compared to the same arm during unilateral speed (70 ± 46 RPM) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poststroke participants pedaled faster with their affected arm unilaterally versus bilateral pedaling, suggesting interhemispheric interference that reduces the ability to recruit the paretic arm during bilateral exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New technology to address affected vs nonaffected arm contributions to ergometer performance in people poststroke.\",\"authors\":\"Christen J Mendonca, Brandon L Kane, Kimberly A Smith, Sangeetha Mohanraj, Laurie A Malone, Mohanraj Thirumalai, James Rimmer, David A Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2356415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When pedaling a coupled-crank arm ergometer, individuals with hemiplegia may experience nonparetic arm overcompensation, and paretic arm resistance, due to neuromechanical deficits. Technologies that foster independent limb contributions may increase the effectiveness of exercise for people poststroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the speed during uncoupled pedaling with the Advanced Virtual Exercise Environment Device among individuals poststroke and non-impaired comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 2 groups:Poststroke and Comparison. Participants attended one lab session and performed peak speed tests and a graded exercise repeated for bilateral pedaling, unilateral (left, right).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one participants completed the protocol (16 women, 15 men). Poststroke participants pedaled slower during the bilateral speed test (64 ± 39 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001), and graded exercise, (54 ± 28 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) versus comparisons (141 ± 19, 104 ± 12 RPM). Poststroke individuals had lower peak RPM during the unilateral speed test with their paretic arm (70 ± 46 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) compared to their unilateral speed test (130 ± 37 RPM) and graded exercise (108 ± 25 RPM) with their nonparetic arm. Comparisons did not differ between arms during speed tests and graded exercise. Poststroke participants demonstrated lower peak speed with their affected arm during the bilateral speed test (52 ± 42 RPM, <i>p</i> < .001) and graded exercise (49 ± 28 RPM, <i>p</i> = .008) compared to the same arm during unilateral speed (70 ± 46 RPM) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poststroke participants pedaled faster with their affected arm unilaterally versus bilateral pedaling, suggesting interhemispheric interference that reduces the ability to recruit the paretic arm during bilateral exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2356415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2356415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于神经机械缺陷,偏瘫患者在蹬双曲柄臂力计时,可能会出现非瘫痪性手臂过度补偿和瘫痪性手臂阻力。促进肢体独立运动的技术可提高中风后患者的运动效果:目的:通过高级虚拟运动环境装置,研究中风后遗症患者和非中风后遗症患者在无耦合蹬踏时的速度:我们招募了两组人:中风后患者和对比组。参与者参加一次实验课,进行峰值速度测试,并重复进行双侧蹬踏、单侧(左侧、右侧)蹬踏的分级练习:31名参与者(16名女性,15名男性)完成了实验。与单侧速度测试(70 ± 46 RPM)和分级练习(58 ± 33 RPM)中同一手臂相比,中风后参与者在双侧速度测试(64 ± 39 RPM,p p p p p p = .008)中的蹬踏速度较慢:结论:脑卒中后参与者单侧蹬踏患臂比双侧蹬踏速度更快,这表明大脑半球间的干扰降低了在双侧运动中募集瘫痪手臂的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New technology to address affected vs nonaffected arm contributions to ergometer performance in people poststroke.

Background: When pedaling a coupled-crank arm ergometer, individuals with hemiplegia may experience nonparetic arm overcompensation, and paretic arm resistance, due to neuromechanical deficits. Technologies that foster independent limb contributions may increase the effectiveness of exercise for people poststroke.

Objective: Examine the speed during uncoupled pedaling with the Advanced Virtual Exercise Environment Device among individuals poststroke and non-impaired comparisons.

Methods: We recruited 2 groups:Poststroke and Comparison. Participants attended one lab session and performed peak speed tests and a graded exercise repeated for bilateral pedaling, unilateral (left, right).

Results: Thirty-one participants completed the protocol (16 women, 15 men). Poststroke participants pedaled slower during the bilateral speed test (64 ± 39 RPM, p < .001), and graded exercise, (54 ± 28 RPM, p < .001) versus comparisons (141 ± 19, 104 ± 12 RPM). Poststroke individuals had lower peak RPM during the unilateral speed test with their paretic arm (70 ± 46 RPM, p < .001) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM, p < .001) compared to their unilateral speed test (130 ± 37 RPM) and graded exercise (108 ± 25 RPM) with their nonparetic arm. Comparisons did not differ between arms during speed tests and graded exercise. Poststroke participants demonstrated lower peak speed with their affected arm during the bilateral speed test (52 ± 42 RPM, p < .001) and graded exercise (49 ± 28 RPM, p = .008) compared to the same arm during unilateral speed (70 ± 46 RPM) and graded exercise (58 ± 33 RPM).

Conclusions: Poststroke participants pedaled faster with their affected arm unilaterally versus bilateral pedaling, suggesting interhemispheric interference that reduces the ability to recruit the paretic arm during bilateral exercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信